by doufus » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 01:08:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'M')y take is the originator of this thread sees some sort of collapse, else he would not have his fantacy of how it develops.
I say his description of the competing fantacies is between those who advocate freedom and self reliance (the survivalists) against those who advocate collective control and theft from producers for the benefit of the collective (the plunderers).
Really government has always been a form of taking by force from those who produce to give to those who do not, principally the power elite (kings, princes, and all sorts of modern day equivalents) so the idea of how society will be is just a rehash of the majority of history.
While there will be plenty of plunder in the future in a breakdown situation, I doubt that the leaders of the collective will do much more than plunder for their own benefit, so doufus will probably still do without, in spite of his fantacy that the big mama/papa government will take care of him by stealing from producers.
My bet is that doufus is totally dependent upon the system, hence he is opposed to those who would take matters in their own hands, and actually produce their own food and defend themselves against the agression of others.
Umm you could not possibly be more wrong on the latter. Although i
think die off/survivalist fantasies are unlikely, the IRONY is that I
would have many multiples of survivability than you. I live in the
Northern territory of australia. My back yard is the size of europe with
200,000 people in it. My capital is 80,000. Crocodile dundee country.
12 ft of rain a year. Plenty of fish, kangaroos, wallaby and turtle. I have a holiday coastal property with water and good soil. I am very experienced
in this country and its properties. I am also quite fit and very healthy.
Even so I have no desire to be utterly reliant on my own efforts for
survival. I have shot and butchered enough buffalo to know that I
don't want to hauling back meat on my shoulders thru a swamp or
flood plain. Crocs. flies. heat. It is a VERY hard life even though it's possible.
But although I am sure that there COULD be a collapse of standard
of living thru PO over decades I am scornful of the survivalist
and individualist mentality HOPING for die off. In a place like the US- heavily populated
with a stuffed environment and high energy habits- I can't see the
point of individual efforts. They will be swamped by the demands of
the collective.
Do u think people won't find you? Do you think the government will
surrender control to the mob or provincial groups? Do you think they will abandon their tax base and political power because energy is tight?
It's NOT a question of me wanting government to take care of me.
It's the reality that government will always want to control YOU.
You didn't think that your farm would be commandeered by government
gunpoint? You didn't think that in the mass population shifts that
happen in such scenarios, somebody would find you and report you
to the people with bigger guns than you?
Individualism is a nice fantasy, but dirty harry only exists in the movies.
Anybody who has ever done this stuff for real is very hopeful that
the mutual benefits of civil society stay in place. They certainly don't
look forward to it.
Even so, I doubt if die off will happen. The great depression wasn't
die off. It was authoritarian. And those who think they can take care
of number one and avoid it are kidding themselves. it WILL find you
and it WILL bend you to its will.
That's why I'd prefer to work to build a soft landing for peak oil rather
than polish a .308 hunting rifle and calculate how many rounds I need
for another 20 years. It's pathetic.