by skyemoor » Thu 18 Aug 2005, 10:33:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'A')s far as brigands go, who are they more a danger too, the practiced non-resister, the fantasizing Rambo, or the totally oblivious?
The practice of non-resistance by the Amish in the US has been to avoid conscription into national armed forces. They have not had to fend for themselves against hungry raiding gangs armed with firearms.
Not sure what you mean by 'fantasizing Rambo". John Rambo was a loner, though he had sufficient combat training. Combat trained personnel are not hard to come by these days.
The totally oblivious will be starving, skill-less, and therefore not a target, unless merely for gratuitous rape and murder.
Allow me to recast your question;
As far as brigands go, who are they more a danger too; those who will not resist them, or those whose resistance will inflict serious loss to the ranks of the brigands?