by theluckycountry » Fri 03 Jan 2025, 02:29:22
What Comes in 2025?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..Much to the European elite’s luck, or shall I say: dismay, though, Russia is not interested in conquering the continent. First: it would not improve their security an iota; quite to the contrary. Second — taking on a European thinking hat — there are already no cheap resources left, and soon there will be no rich market to serve either, only 450 million disgruntled elderly people full of hatred. Who in their right mind would want to control such a territory…?
The Honest Sorcerer
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')First of all, let me wish you a Happy New Year, and thank all the support you gave throughout 2024. I truly appreciate it. We are living in incredibly interesting times — to say the least — and 2025 will be no different. The post WWII world order is definitely over, and the world economy faces massive challenges among growing polarization and geopolitical upheaval. We are witnessing a worldwide struggle for resources, energy, trade routes and growing financial instability. Western and Eurasian powers are at war with each other on multiple fronts. This, however, is not a war between good and evil where the good side wins and everyone lives happily after. As thing stand today we are in for an awful long race to the bottom. Industrial civilization — based on finite and polluting resources — is unsustainable, no matter how much we want it to succeed and no matter where we live. Life is going to be extremely hard without this much technology, and ultimately it will not matter which team you rooted for. The only way through this bottleneck (if there is any) will be via collaboration, self sufficiency, small local economies and building small scale democratic structures. Large geopolitical entities are on their way out, and even the strongest survivor will fall eventually.
Welcome to part two of my longish analysis of world events at the turn of 2025. If you haven’t done so, please read part one: What a Year 2024 Was, where I laid out the geophysical realities underpinning world events. Again, coming from a world dominated by the Western narrative of things, the following might seem contra intuitive at best, or outright upsetting at worst. As usual, I strongly advise my readers to seek out alternative sources of information, and to take anything appearing on mainstream media with a huge pinch of salt. We are living through the collapse of modernity — which unlike the movies — will take decades to unfold in a slow motion trainwreck. No one will come on TV and admit that we are running out of stuff and the only way through this massive bottleneck is collaboration. Instead we will hear more rhetoric advocating for more war, more great power competition, “removing of red tape” and the like. So, treat what you hear, see and read lightly, and always keep this larger context in mind. Prepare for a tumultuous 2025.
Europe
It is perhaps not terribly risky to start by saying: we should expect more of the same in 2025. A deepening energy crisis, leading to further deindustrialization, layoffs and plant closures. Higher inflation, lower living standards — and not just in the EU. An accelerating collapse in discretionary spending (vehicles, leisure, consumer products etc.). Less democracy but more political theater to obscure the true extent of the West’s malaise. Peace talks commencing between the US and Russia, with fighting still going on unabated, and with European’s being pushed to the sidelines.
The war in Ukraine will reach its endpoint in 2025. Some sort of settlement of the conflict will be reached: if not through a political / negotiating process, then through a forced military collapse. Unfortunately there is still a lot of misunderstanding and misinformation in the West with regards to what is at stake here, although the picture gets clearer by the day (even for mainstream news consumers). Contrary to the now slowly dissolving (old) narrative, this war was never about a ‘land grab’ or the ‘rebuilding of empire’ but about conflicting economic, military and political spheres of influence. And that includes mineral resources, labor and markets for the West, and security concerns for Russia. All this in an area controlled by the latter for centuries, and coming on top of several invasions from the West (first during the Napoleonic wars, then in WWI and WWII). Ensuring a neutral, non-nuclear status for Ukraine thus remains paramount to Russians, but taking hold of the entire country is not. In fact everyone would be much better of with an independent, non-nuclear, de-militarized nation state between NATO and Russia.
The picture is really not complicated: the West wants resources, Russia wants peace. Normal states in normal times could easily solve this “conundrum” by two clever inventions: trade and arms control, both of which were working brilliantly in the past. The good times are over though. Having slowly run out of cheap-to-produce resources and having their industries shipped abroad, debts taken on by Western states could no longer be repaid on the basis of (real) economic growth. Elites there had two choices: continue with the pretense that nothing is wrong, or try to take control over resources abroad (serving as collateral). (Admitting that the current economic arrangement was never sustainable and that it had only led to soaring inequality was never an option.) Since pretense has only led to the money printing press running amok, the only remaining option was to provoke wars and to change as many regimes to favorable ones as possible. (‘Let’s just fight’ — as a former UK prime minister used to say).
Seeing the untenable military situation in Europe, however, the next US administration might start a tardy overhaul of the European security architecture (pulling back missile and military bases together with nuclear weapons) — reversing the policies of the past three decades. There is a catch however: while Russia is fully onboard with this de-escalation approach, it looks wholly uninterested in restoring economic relationship with Europe. This permanent looking cut-off from cheap energy and resources from Siberia, could make the EU’s economic collapse all but inevitable. The continent-wide block has long lost all its competitive advantages and is already busy turning itself into a mausoleum, a tomb of long dead empires. Without cheap energy and resources though, the EU will eventually find itself lying in one of those sarcophagi. And while a slowly deindustrializing and re-militarizing Europe will surely remain a lucrative market for US made weapons and fuel for some years to come, the EU might in the process become too poor to buy anything from America. And then, perhaps much sooner than anyone expects it, Europe could suddenly find itself defending against Russia all by itself, which it won’t be able to do. Again, no affordable energy, no economy. No economy, no military. As simple as that...