by evilgenius » Wed 03 Feb 2021, 06:01:52
I think, along the lines of unpersoning, that the right is offended by the left's use of rights that are characterized as extending from an individual's identity, and not extending from their broader definition as a human being in general. At least, the right's fears frame it that way. That is actually something to be afraid of in any society.
Then too, the left keeps trying to tell the right that the definition of human being has been slanted toward whiteness for so long that it has lost power to represent some people fully. Oh, it is the Twenty First Century, they can get some of what they have a right to, but not everything.
To which the right counters that whites were never what the focus was about, but economic certainty. The definition, they might assert, has been pegged to success, and the left are trying to insist upon honoring failure. The way this argues out goes on and on...
Interestingly, both sides claim a legitimate reaction to slow, or structural, violence. The left claim their protests are against institutionalized racism. The right claim theirs are against the fundamental trampling of their constitutional rights.