by evilgenius » Fri 01 May 2020, 13:26:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('REAL Green', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('asg70', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('evilgenius', '
')That anger may actually rise up to the level where folks question embedded order within society.
That's kind of how we got Trump, though. A lot of the conspiracy theories are coming from Trump's base but instead of implicating Trump himself they've made Bill Gates and the WHO a scapegoat.
Really, we're no smarter today than in the past. When times get tough people always seek out scapegoats rather than to accept the notion that what goes up must one day must come down.
You got Trump becuase you gave us Hillary. Trump should never of happened. Conspiracies are on both sides as the Flynn case now exposes all to see. Binary finger pointing will destroy society and this is from both sides. When failure is not owned, we all fail.
The only problem with putting it that way is that it totally dissolves either the amount of effort expended by one side, or how far they have come. When Obama sought to work across the aisle, they refused to work with him. They knew they could lie about their resistance. There are deliberate evils at work in the world. They are almost always a function of some will to power.
I agree that Hillary had a will to power. I don't know if I buy all of my various friends assessments of her. But, based upon how hated she was by an immovable base of people on the right, and how gullible those who aren't always aligned with the right are, but have proven themselves incapable of arriving at an assessment independent of receiving drivel, I thought she should have bowed out. She could not have won, no matter what. Trump's rise to power proved that you could put anybody against her, and she would lose.
Now there is this Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. I was reading an article today by somebody who said they thought it was a load of crap. They gave several reasons. Then I read the comments. Within the first few there were several immoral perverts, er, republican shills who couldn't resist pointing out how Kavanaugh was treated. And how Biden should get the same. Well, only if they want to go back on what Kavanaugh did get, which was to become approved. They want Biden to go through it, and see if he will fail in some way. They want to test the left for no good reason at all, except that they are the other side of an opinion.
What the country really needs to do is wake up concerning how led around they are. Honestly, it's like a bull being led by a nose ring. They let their valuable only to them single issue points of view crowd out what is best for everyone. They don't care if they are wrong. I think it is quite possibly an incurable ill with America. It has a wound that cannot be healed. And attempting to do so only makes it worse.
by REAL Green » Sun 03 May 2020, 13:45:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gollum', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', 'C')ongress will bail out the airlines in the name of national security (I really wish there was a special sarcasm font for those last two words)
They might try but unless they're willing to actually take ownership and massively subsidize them they'll never be able to even come close to breaking even. It would have to be dammed near free to fly before a lot of people will get on an airliner again. Maybe, just maybe, they could refocus primarily on moving cargo and carry passengers as a sideline and survive.
I bet Buffet had actionable intelligence the Government is not going to bail airlines out in a way an investor like Buffet would profit from so he bailed out. If the pickings looked good, he may have bought in more. So, it is likely a consolidation that is a bailout of sorts will happen. Maybe we see several name brand airlines disappear. Let’s face it, the US gets around by car and plane so airlines will have to be maintained to some extent. It is obvious there is huge overcapacity at all levels in the airline sector so there will be blood.
realgreenadaptation.blog
by REAL Green » Mon 04 May 2020, 09:10:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') bet Buffet had actionable intelligence the Government is not going to bail airlines out in a way an investor like Buffet would profit from so he bailed out
well no. What he did was realize the sector was going to be dead for awhile and there was other places he might be able to put his money.
Don't be naive, a man like Buffet and his team are well connected. People like Buffet and his team often are the ones driving policy through their lobbying effort. I agree some of his decision is a no brainer of an industries situation and good investing. Some of it is knowing what policies are ahead and how that will affect returns. Theoretically if the fed and gov are leaning to support airlines it may have been in Buffets favor to risk buying an airline that looks to be a chosen one to survive by active government support. We are in a new world of MMT post Covid. I doubt we can even normalize to pre Covid days which were already suffering bad Moral Hazards of central bank intervention where the rich and connected are first in line to the money bags. In any case us peons don't know what is in the fed, gov, and Buffets heads we just have our sowing circles of debate.
realgreenadaptation.blog
by Tanada » Mon 04 May 2020, 13:46:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gollum', 'T')hey might try but unless they're willing to actually take ownership and massively subsidize them they'll never be able to even come close to breaking even. It would have to be dammed near free to fly before a lot of people will get on an airliner again. Maybe, just maybe, they could refocus primarily on moving cargo and carry passengers as a sideline and survive.
Air cargo is the absolutely worst way to ship goods from place to place unless time is the major factor being looked at. A great many silly things have entered the air cargo market under the "just in time" shipping systems that grew up over the last two decades.
But from a cash on the barrel head no free subsidies point of view shipping a cargo container stuffed with lightweight boxes of sneakers or other footwear by air so they arrive in a day or less instead of three weeks on a slow efficient cargo ship comes with a simply huge energy cost.
Organs being shipped for transplant or some of the more delicate luxury foods like caviar on ice might be a profitable air cargo, or a company like UPS/FedEx who promise fast delivery of packages might be able to pay the freight costs. But shipping any bulk cargo like a container of grain or a container of scrap iron is a non-starter at face value.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.