Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Cholesterol is good for you

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Thu 22 Mar 2018, 17:00:44

Actually, yes it is true that our bodies crave certain "bad" foods and we can allow laziness to become habitual. But my point was that feeling energetic and healthy translates to feeling better mentally as the opposite tends to depress us and bring us down. At least that is my experience
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 22 Mar 2018, 18:12:26

No argument. But the process of feeling energetic involves depriving yourself of rich foods and excess calories for a prolonged period, and then exercising daily until exhausted. Then when you have lost all the excess fatty weight, kicked your metabolism into a higher gear, and built lean muscle mass, you will indeed feel better mentaly and physically.

But the diet faddists - which term describes the majority of people - are going on and off different diet plans, continuing to eat too much and exercise too little, and are endlessly looking for what is best described as "f--king magic", a way to eat until sated, perform minor and unstrenuous activity, and lose weight hand over fist and without hardship. 80 percent are overweight and out of shape, the percentage has been creeping up as the population ages and Boomers retire.

But the steady stream of diet books, videos, meal plans, and the relentless marketing of "f--king magic" continues unabated. I made myself unpopular in this thread because I pointed out that this is total BS. To get healthy, you eat less and exercise more. No magic needed, and none exists anyway.

I never said it was easy, because it is in fact very hard to do successfully. But you need to understand the facts, and the facts would be that "f--king magic" does not exist, no matter how hard or how long you look.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Thu 22 Mar 2018, 18:54:06

I agree fully with all you just said K. And the reward will be a healthy body that many I think do not fully appreciate until they lack it. I would only add that a whole food (not processed foods) balance diverse diet stressing fruits & vegetables also affords great benefits. So am I health nut? No. Just recognizing that its easier to be unhealthy than healthy especially for those of us over 50
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 09:46:19

Researchers are trying to overcome the big pharma media blitz in favor of putting the entire world on statin drugs. Quite a bit more at link below quote.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Study Links Statins to 300+ Adverse Health Effects
A new study finds the chemical war against cholesterol using statin drugs was justified through statistical deception and the cover up of over 300 adverse health effects documented in the biomedical literature.

Better safe than sorry, right? This is the logic that defines the grasp that the pharmaceutical company has on our psyche. Perhaps your mother, father, brother, and boyfriend have been recommended cholesterol-lowering medication, just to help hedge their bets around a possible chest-clutching demise. In fact, recent guidelines have expanded the pool of potential statin medication recipients, so that there seem to be very few of us walking around with acceptable levels of artery-clogging sludge.

But how is it that drug companies got a foothold? How have they convinced doctors that their patients need these medications, and need them now? They are banking (literally) on the fact that you haven’t brushed up on statistics in a while.
Getting Tricky with Data
It turns out that a common sleight of hand in the medical literature is the popularization of claims around “relative risk reduction” which can make an effect appear meaningful, when the “absolute risk reduction” reveals its insignificance. In this way, 100 people are treated with statin medications to offer 1 person benefit, and the change from a 2% to a 1% heart attack rate is billed a 50% reduction rather than a 1% improvement, which is what it actually is.

Perhaps this would still qualify as better safe than sorry if these medications weren’t some of the most toxic chemicals willfully ingested, with at least 300 adverse health effects evident in the published literature so far, with at least 28 distinct modes of toxicity, including:

Muscle damage (myotoxicity): view 80 studies here.
Nerve damage (neurotoxicity): view 54 studies here.
Liver damage (hepatoxocity): view 32 studies here.
Endocrine disruption: view 16 studies here.
Cancer-promoting: view 9 studies here.
Diabetes-promoting: view 8 studies here.
Cardiovascular-damaging: view 15 studies here.
Birth defect causing (teratogenic): view 11 studies here.

Beyond the known fact that statin drugs deplete the body of two essential nutrients: coenzyme Q10 and selenium, they are also highly myotoxic and neurotoxic. Because the heart is one of the most nerve-saturated muscles in the human body, these two modes of toxicity combined represent a ‘perfect storm’ of cardiotoxicity – a highly ironic fact considering statin drugs are promoted as having ‘life-saving’ cardioprotective properties.


LINK
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 11:10:17

Years ago I tested for high cholestrol while living in Thailand, that was before I started the project here in Panama. For $ 100
I was able to secure a 1 year supply of Zocor from Merck in Australia that the local pharmacy in Thailand offered. I was thinking of all my poor friends in the USA paying thousands for the same drug.

ANd then I decided to stop taking them after two years as I arrived at the conclusion that the whole statin drug thing was a huge scam.

Beware. You first get scammed into thinking you need the drugs

And then you get scammed having to pay ridiculous prices

Life in America !

One big scam

No wonder we elected the ultimate scammer as head of state.

And we will probably vote him in again because Americans love to get scammed up the ass .
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby dissident » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 15:57:15

There is no way that a drug which targets coenzyme Q10 is a good idea for any sort of treatment. It is the modern equivalent of blood letting. Coenzyme Q10 is at the core of a vast array of metabolic chemical pathways. Gunning for it is like blowing off the head to remove a head louse.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178961/
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 16:13:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') Cholesterol is a compensatory mechanism for excess trans fat in the body in addition to its normal roles as a hormone prerequisite and structural repair aid. By limiting endogenous cholesterol production as Statin medication does you limit the bodies capability to deal with the trans fats already stored in your system and those eaten in processed food every day. The FDA allows food manufacturers to label foods as 0 grams trans fat so long as 'one serving' is 'less than 0.5 grams'. In practice this means some manufacturers reduced the serving size enough to fall below the threshold without making any substitution for the use of trans fats in their process. In Europe they could not get away with this because the government requires nutrition labels list all ingredients as part of the standard quantity of 100 gram

Great to know as I love eggs :razz:
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 16:28:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', ' ')80 percent are overweight and out of shape, the percentage has been creeping up as the population ages and Boomers retire.

But the steady stream of diet books, videos, meal plans, and the relentless marketing of "f--king magic" continues unabated. I made myself unpopular in this thread because I pointed out that this is total BS. To get healthy, you eat less and exercise more. No magic needed, and none exists anyway.

That much seems to be agreed on by the serious, credible documentaries I've seen on the problem.

The successful weight losers who become fit and healthy long term in such documentaries ALL change both their eating and exercise regimes SIGNIFICANTLY over the long term, because that's the only thing that works, at the end of the day.

Naturally, human nature doesn't want to accept that harsh reality, and naturally LOTS of people/outfits are happy to exploit that to make lots of money. Some things never change.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 16:35:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'Y')ears ago I tested for high cholestrol while living in Thailand, that was before I started the project here in Panama. For $ 100
I was able to secure a 1 year supply of Zocor from Merck in Australia that the local pharmacy in Thailand offered. I was thinking of all my poor friends in the USA paying thousands for the same drug.

ANd then I decided to stop taking them after two years as I arrived at the conclusion that the whole statin drug thing was a huge scam.

Beware. You first get scammed into thinking you need the drugs

And then you get scammed having to pay ridiculous prices

But you can't just assume that's always true. You need to take responsibility for your own health, look at the data, and insist on having a doctor who will work with you and look at the data too, vs. just cramming you with pills for every perceived issue. Such doctors exist, but you have to look for them and explain to them what you're looking for -- and be willing to pay the freight for longer sessions if they're needed for evaluating data, etc.

I keep my cholesterol low through diet (unlike blood pressure, which is all over my family history). My doctor has never even tried to push cholesterol medication at me, even if it gets marginal for a while.

Just like your financials, you job, or any other big part of your life, "success" starts with taking personal responsibility. There are no guarantees, but doing nothing results in the typical fat American with self inflicted "money woes" (from endless bad choices) and who wants that?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 17:08:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')reat to know as I love eggs :razz:


as I remember there is a published study that links increased consumption of egg yolks (more than 2.5 per week) to a 1.5 times greater risk of fatal prostate cancer.

That being said I'm sure there are studies that say different. The things I have learned by delving into the published research a bit with regards to medical studies on diet (for my own benefit) is:

1. most studies I've read either have a woefully small compliment of double-blind subjects to be very meaningful or on the other hand, rely on "self-reporting" which has its own problems. As an example who actually admits to how much alcohol they might drink each week?
2. It is very difficult if not impossible to isolate out any particular food ingested from other lifestyle issues (eg. smoking, exercise, drinking, sleep patterns, etc) and at the same time isolate that foods "forcings" versus its interactions with other foods
3. Given the issues with very high-level food impacts studies that delve down to the impact of actual vitamins present in foods becomes even more suspect. As an example, vitamin E in supplemental form is seen as a high risk for certain cancer reoccurrence whereas similar doses through natural sources such as nuts don't have the same results. Is the reason for this or is it just a factor of the issues with testing?
4. No matter where you turn there is always something bad for you in some way. What might be a healthy food to pursue for your arthritis might also be completely bad news for your liver. For years we were told that coffee was bad for you but a number of research papers in the past few years have pointed out two anti-carcinogens present in unfiltered coffee beans (mostly dark espresso beans) and said research recommends 4 - 6 cups of unfiltered java a day as a defensive position. Alcohol has been suggested by some as a carcinogen yet many heavy drinkers never get any cancer and some studies have actually shown there is a negative correlation between alcohol consumption and some forms of cancer (of course there are other risks from alcohol but which are real and which aren't'?). Whose right...whose wrong? I certainly don't know.
5. Statistics reporting can be an issue. As an example, a paper might arrive at the conclusion that a particular food increases your risk of a particular cancer 1.5 times. But standing back a few paces you see that particular cancer only is a problem for 8% of the population. What that means is by consuming that food your risk factor went from 8% to 12%. Is it worth changing your patterns to address that increased risk? Is it even meaningful when you look at the significance range? Looking at some of these studies what they report as consuming X might increase your risk by Y amount really has a wide range of error that overlaps with the null case, meaning the claim of additional risk is statistically unwarranted.

All of that aside it is really clear that trying to understand how the human body reacts to anything is difficult. It isn't like a science experiment in the lab where you can control the experimental universe such that you know exactly what variables are in play. And organic chains and their interactions can be very complex. Most doctors I have ever talked to about the subject admit that they know very little about what is going on but take the most conservative approach possible understanding that when they prescribe drugs or behavioral changes that is an experiment that they need to monitor.

On the other hand, it is impossible to ignore the effects of diet on disease. A friend of mine who is somewhat famous for delving into this as a "layman" is Ashton Embry. Ash has a Ph.D. in Geology and has been a research scientist for the Canadian government for neigh on 35 years. His son was stricken with MS and the doctors could not control it with drugs. Ash, being the inquisitive scientist that he is, spent an enormous amount of time researching everything available on the subject and came to the conclusion that his son's body was reacting to food intolerances. He put him under a very strict diet and in short order, the symptoms disappeared. Now years later Ash's son is disease-free and has become a fairly renown filmmaker. Of course, this is one person and arguably that approach won't work for everyone but it does point to the fact that there is some linkage. But what do you do with that information when there is conflicting information out there?
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 18:12:12

Thanks Roc. In one respect, I don't think you can go wrong. The more natural foods you consume the better and conversely the more artificial processed the worse
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 19:25:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he more natural foods you consume the better and conversely the more artificial processed the worse


but even there the studies show discrepancies. As an example, we all know it makes sense to avoid cured meats because of the preservatives and you see lots of sliced meats now in the supermarket with labeling "no preservatives". But studies have shown that most of these products still use celery extract which works as a preservative and those studies indicate it is potentially as bad for you as the preservatives we are always told to avoid. What about smoked salmon? Does the healthy benefits of cold water fish (omega 3 fatty acids) outweigh the bad from the smoking process? Damned if I know. My doctor refers to all of this as the dangers of TMI (too much information).

And then we are told how healthy the Mediterranean diet is. Have any of these doctors actually been to Italy or Spain? Cured sausage is nearly a staple there so is all the other healthy stuff in that diet (eg. olive oil, lycopenes via tomatoes, garlic/onions etc) canceling out the bad from the cured sausage? Who the heck knows?

And as to the Paleo diet I get a good chuckle out of that as a defense against disease. If you remember the famous cave man hunter who was found preserved in a European glacier a few years back scientists have gotten around to figuring out what he ate as well as what health problems he had when he died (of a bonk on the head by a club I think). Turns out he had the perfect paleo diet but it also turns out he had advanced heart disease, more advanced than anyone would imagine for someone of that age, diet and fitness level. The fallout is that a lot of this is due to what you inherited and not necessarily to what you consume.

So staying slim and eating healthy, not drinking alcohol may be a good piece of insurance or it may be a wasted effort.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 20:01:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '.') You need to take responsibility for your own health, look at the data, and insist on having a doctor who will work with you and look at the data too......................,


Just like the doctors that over prescribed opiods because of the incentives from the drug pushing pharmaceutical industry.

My chapter in the world of commerce was selling medical devices and going to dozens of trade shows in the medical industry for 15 years. I had to schmooze and wine and dine surgeons and doctors for years. They are human just like the rest of us greedy human bastards.

You seem to still be holding on to this antiquated notion that a doctor in a white uniform somehow represent so some saintly authority with your best interests in mind.... you know, the hypocratic oath..... its more like the hypocritic oath these days.

I do agree with you on the notion to take personal responsibility which is exactly why you should have a healthy skepticism to the medical industry...... its rotten to the core.

Keeping terminal cancer patients on medicare on chemotherapy to rake in billions and billions. THose doctors know these patients will die a horrible extended painful death and they milk milk milk the families with false hopes to rake in the big bucks.

Do you even have the beginning of a clue how rampantly corrupt the medical industry is?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Sat 14 Dec 2019, 20:49:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '.') You need to take responsibility for your own health, look at the data, and insist on having a doctor who will work with you and look at the data too......................,


Just like the doctors that over prescribed opiods because of the incentives from the drug pushing pharmaceutical industry.

My chapter in the world of commerce was selling medical devices and going to dozens of trade shows in the medical industry for 15 years. I had to schmooze and wine and dine surgeons and doctors for years. They are human just like the rest of us greedy human bastards.

You seem to still be holding on to this antiquated notion that a doctor in a white uniform somehow represent so some saintly authority with your best interests in mind.... you know, the hypocratic oath..... its more like the hypocritic oath these days.

I do agree with you on the notion to take personal responsibility which is exactly why you should have a healthy skepticism to the medical industry...... its rotten to the core.

Keeping terminal cancer patients on medicare on chemotherapy to rake in billions and billions. THose doctors know these patients will die a horrible extended painful death and they milk milk milk the families with false hopes to rake in the big bucks.

Do you even have the beginning of a clue how rampantly corrupt the medical industry is?


The outcomes speak for themselves of how bad US HEALTHCARE has become https://time.com/2888403/u-s-health-car ... ped-world/
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby Cog » Sun 15 Dec 2019, 07:59:45

Obesity is a key factor in several metabolic diseases as well as increased odds of developing thirteen types of cancers. Knowing this I changed my diet and this is not a fad diet but a diet I'm sticking with until they put me in the ground. I eat meat, fresh fruit and vegetables. That's it. No processed foods, sugar, and no grains. Its sort of a modified Atkins diet since I do get more carbs than they recommend but its in the form of sugars from fruits. Since February I'm lost 53 pounds. Was 249 lbs and today at 196 lbs. Exercise was not a factor in this weight loss although I do walk an hour three or four times a week to keep up muscle strength.

We have a saying in our weight loss group. You can not outrun a spoon. I have found that those people who are obese, who try to simply do portion control, have a real problem losing weight since they are hungry all the time and end of binge eating. The key factor, IMO, is carbs. Eliminate or severely limit carbs and eat meats, fruits, and veggies and you won't be hungry all the time and you will lose weight.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Sun 15 Dec 2019, 10:07:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'O')besity is a key factor in several metabolic diseases as well as increased odds of developing thirteen types of cancers. Knowing this I changed my diet and this is not a fad diet but a diet I'm sticking with until they put me in the ground. I eat meat, fresh fruit and vegetables. That's it. No processed foods, sugar, and no grains. Its sort of a modified Atkins diet since I do get more carbs than they recommend but its in the form of sugars from fruits. Since February I'm lost 53 pounds. Was 249 lbs and today at 196 lbs. Exercise was not a factor in this weight loss although I do walk an hour three or four times a week to keep up muscle strength.

We have a saying in our weight loss group. You can not outrun a spoon. I have found that those people who are obese, who try to simply do portion control, have a real problem losing weight since they are hungry all the time and end of binge eating. The key factor, IMO, is carbs. Eliminate or severely limit carbs and eat meats, fruits, and veggies and you won't be hungry all the time and you will lose weight.

Yes, the Paleo diet that our ancestors practiced for a long time :-D
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Sun 15 Dec 2019, 12:31:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')es, the Paleo diet that our ancestors practiced for a long time :-D


read my post above about the caveman who was found frozen in a glacier. He was likely one of the inventors of the paleo diet, exercised every day and had advanced heart disease. So no guarantees I'm afraid. What works for one is not necessarily going to work for another. What is working for Cog might create problems for someone else given the one bit of literature out there that does seem to be consistent is a link between excessive red meat consumption and a number of potential health issues. Again the word is potential...you might be the one who consumes red meat straight off the bbq twice a day for 60 years and have the health of a twenty-year-old or you might be the one who eats red meat once a day and gets colon cancer. You might be the overweight layabout who lives to 100 or you might be the scrawny guy who is active at his job 8 hours a day and has a stroke in his fifties. Nobody understands this stuff very well as yet which I think makes any diet not without risks.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Cholesterol is good for you

Unread postby onlooker » Sun 15 Dec 2019, 12:44:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')es, the Paleo diet that our ancestors practiced for a long time :-D


read my post above about the caveman who was found frozen in a glacier. He was likely one of the inventors of the paleo diet, exercised every day and had advanced heart disease. So no guarantees I'm afraid. What works for one is not necessarily going to work for another. What is working for Cog might create problems for someone else given the one bit of literature out there that does seem to be consistent is a link between excessive red meat consumption and a number of potential health issues. Again the word is potential...you might be the one who consumes red meat straight off the bbq twice a day for 60 years and have the health of a twenty-year-old or you might be the one who eats red meat once a day and gets colon cancer. You might be the overweight layabout who lives to 100 or you might be the scrawny guy who is active at his job 8 hours a day and has a stroke in his fifties. Nobody understands this stuff very well as yet which I think makes any diet not without risks.


Yes, that could be due to the genetic profile of certain indivuduals. They're is no 100% non deviation. Interestingly, the Plague is another reminder of this. As some people appeared to have a genetic protection to the symptoms of the Plague and thus did not succumb to it as so many others did in the Dark ages.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Previous

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron