by Outcast_Searcher » Mon 02 Dec 2019, 21:40:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('asg70', 'T')ragedy of the commons write large. Superchargers are put in place to cover average usage, not spikes when every EV user in the area jumps in their cars and road trips at the exact same time. EV owners should not expect to be able to do those sorts of trips. It's not the end of the world and is a poor thing to seize on for FUD. Ain't gonna kill suburbia, folks.
To be fair, though, this IS a risk of trip-taking in a BEV during busy periods like holiday rushes, at least until there is plenty of spare charging infrastructure, just like with the mature ICE landscape, there is an abundance of gas stations.
Just like, to be fair, if there is an oil crisis due to weather, gas stations might have to close and there might be gas lines; just like if the grid is down, there might be an issue charging BEV's in an area.
To me, this is a reason why HEV's, or perhaps PHEV's are a great transitional vehicle while the next decade or so sorts a LOT of such issues out, and also helps the cost of BEV's come down. No range anxiety, unless gas lines become a common and widespread thing.
...
But either side claiming either condition "can't happen" or claiming it is "unfair" to point it out when it inevitably DOES happen, isn't being reasonable, IMO.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.