by AdamB » Thu 01 Feb 2018, 15:26:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dissident', 'I')n a lot of the rabid denial of peak oil, the fact that discoveries have faded to well below replacement levels is systematically ignored. This allows for the wiggle room to spout BS.
T = Integral[(R(t)/E(t))dt]
Let us know when that equation, or your claim of what has been "discovered" properly accounts for the work the USGS has done, and the shale plays themselves, you know, those oil amounts approaching the size of some of those largest USGS assessments?
Because until it does, no one gets any credibility for a discovery equation that must EXCLUDE hundreds of billions, if not potentially a trillion or more barrels, just so they can play old fashioned peak oil idiot math games that didn't work last time.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"