Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

BNP discussion

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:23:46

If there are no differences between 'members of different races', why are most African countries basket cases and most western countries more or less functional?

YOU'RE the cause of this situation. It's YOUR fault and it's YOUR responsibility to fix this situation. Get it now??
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby Phil » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 03:38:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', 'I')s response to blood pressure medication a behavioural trend?
"It has uncovered differences in response to medications; in fact here in the States the medical profession became involved in a lengthy argument on labeling a medication as for African Americans only. This has been the only real outcome of "racial" pharmacogenomics as applied to race"
And it was so widely debated that it is not even funny any more.
The vast majority of physicians deplore this "marketing propaganda"


Neither my argument, nor that of the BNP, hinges on the circumstances of that particular drug. I'm sure the BNP member who wrote that did so because it's in the news, and it's yet another example of the biological reality of race.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')urray is not exactly well received in the BioMedical Community


Yeah it's a shame that political correctness is so pervasive in the sciences that it retards legitimate and important exploration.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')ecause he relentelessly quoted studies with falsified data from the 50- 70s,


Example?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd he was more interested in coining up terms like "dysgenic traits".


That's quite a legitimate term. If, for example, mental retardation isn't a "dysgenic trait", then what would you call it?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e also had an excellent ability to twist statistics to fit his preconceived interpretations.


Example?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')egarding the IQ studies: Any study that fails to adjust for socioeconomic level and cultural factors will never be able to make a case for a racial superiority.


This is disingenuous. You haven't even read the book.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hen cultural factors are taken into account, IQ differences disappear (i.e. the IQ scale is relative not absolute)


More rubbish. Read this: [URL=http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/stalkers/em_tbc.html]Race, Socioeconomic Variables, and Intelligence: A Review and Extension of The Bell Curve
[/URL]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW educate yourself on the Bell Curve (i.e. the Gaussian distribution, not the book). The test is standardized to have a mean of 100 with a standard deviation of 15.


Yawn.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o a difference between 96 and 98 in such a curve is non-existent. So do your stats and call me back

When black mothers below 90 IQ are having two and three times more children than white mothers with IQ over 110, that's a huge problem in spite of your racial naïveté. Pat yourself on the back, moron, as you advocate the demise of the West.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')oming from a military family with two grandfathers who fought in WWII and who participated in the Resistance during WWII, a grandmother who was held hostage by the occupation forces and a mother who almost died of hunger in occupied Europe during WWII I find the rest of your comments insulting.

Wow you're chocked full of non-sequiturs.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o everyone (and above all yourself) a favour and pick up a real scientific book and not propaganda and study it carefully.

It's precisely because I do read that I understand the importance of evolutionary biology with respect to human behavior and intelligence.

The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability (Human Evolution, Behavior, and Intelligence)

Intelligence, Race, and Genetics: Conversations with Arthur R. Jensen

Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective (3rd Edition)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW with 30% of all UK doctors being foreigners, I hope you are willing to die so that no one smears your whiteness trying to help you.

The Whites in Britain will be just fine. I think they'd gladly trade those doctors for their cities back.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m glad that you and the other BNPers showed your face .... time to activate our societal reflexes both here in the US and back in Europe

Does that mean silencing those who don't imbibe in your farcical tripe with jail or violence? I think you have an emotional or political interest in distorting the science of race to the detriment of Whites. Are you White, Energy Spin?
Last edited by Phil on Mon 18 Jul 2005, 06:19:56, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Unread postby Phil » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 04:28:01

I wish to propose for the reader's favourable consideration an article which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The article in question is this: Don't Write Off the Liberals

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am a liberal. I am also a white woman committed to my race and civilization. I am in favor of much of what is called "big government," I think the Second Amendment is an anachronism, and I have been reading American Renaissance for more than five years. This may appear to be a shocking contradiction but, as I will show, it is not. Nor am I alone in my views. Admittedly, there are not very many of us liberals-cum-racial nationalists, but I predict there will be more. The white consciousness movement needs friends – from across the political spectrum – if it is to succeed, and it should not structure itself in a way that discourages potential allies needlessly.
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Unread postby Doly » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 05:52:19

This only serves to prove that one doesn't have to agree with political ideas in whole bunches, in spite of the careful education that we've all received from governments that there's only a very limited number of parties (in many countries, only two), which restricts enormously our capacity for political choice.

My political ideas include some that are considered "conservative", some that are considered "liberal", some that are very middle-of-the-road and some that are considered very "radical". There's no political party with an agenda that comes even close to mine, and logically I don't vote. And to be honest, I believe that only sheeple find their political ideas fit with those of any party.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 06:13:06

Meanwhile every US college and even high school has it's Hispanic Club - woops La Raza (The Race) club, Asian club, black club of course, etc. Starbuck's has a rack of the CD's they play for sale, and one of the black jazz musicians they prominently feature is famous for saying that if he knew he had five minutes to live, he'd like to spend them strangling a white man. Said jazz musician grew up middle-class, better off than most whites.

Now, let's talk about our fellow environmentalists, greens, etc. Most realize that humans are not ideals, and realize that humans obey genetic laws, and tend to prefer their own family, then clan, then tribe, then race. Some may have actually read Richard Dawkins on this.

Literary luminaries like Mark Twain, Henry Miller, and so on, when you read their stuff, turn out to be out-and-out racists.

Where I grew up thinking in terms of race is a fact of life, your race determines your livelihood, where you live, whether you live in fear and caution (the more white you are the more dangerous it is) and so on. Whole occupations and living places are forbidden to those of the wrong race. I myself belong to a race with less rights - and this is written into law - than any other in the US. It is written into law how much college help I may get (the bare minimum) and with what priority I may be hired or promoted (lowest).

Everyone applauds when Blacks want to set up their own schools, neighborhoods, school curriculum, version of history, etc. But dare to say that you're white and you simply want to live where you're not prey, and everyone freaks out.

The BNP right now is, from everything I've heard, by and large a collection of buffoons. Living is so good now, here and in England, and the struggle for survival so attenuated, that it could hardly be otherwise.

As we pass the Peak and the standard of living goes down everywhere, the old struggles that created different genetic races in the first place will be reasserted. Talented, capable, energetic people will find themselves out of work and frustrated, just like with the NSDAP in Germany in the 1930s, the original smalltimers and buffoons will be replaced with hardened, resolved, people. The BNP will be a force to be reckoned with.

In the US it's official doctrine with the Republican Party that peak oil is NOT a fact. That oil will go on and on forever and ever. The Democrats, some of them, acknowledge Peak Oil, and our environmental problems. Trouble is, they're trying to be Republican Lite these days. And, the ones who know Peak Oil is real tend to also think we should all go vegan, and that whites should be punished for ...... being white. How else do you explain affirmative action etc brought to you by white uncle tom democrats?

The BNP is acknowledging Peak Oil, AND daring to talk about the elephent in the living room - that whites are being displaced and preyed upon and singled out for extinction, with government sanction. That's an extremely powerful combination. Some of us want to survive in spite of our white skin AND are big ol' tree huggers.

There's no party in the US to match the BNP .... yet.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby Phil » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 07:06:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', ' ')There's no party in the US to match the BNP .... yet.


Well let's start one. A peak oil nationalists' party. I already have our pick for president: Jared Taylor, editor for American Renaissance magazine and Yale alum. Listen to his interviews.

# Vice President (?)
# Secretary of State (?)
# Secretary of the Treasury - Catherine Austin Fitts
# Secretary of Defense - Wesley Clark
# Director of the CIA - Mike Ruppert
# Attorney General (?)
# Secretary of the Interior - Tom Tancredo
# Secretary of Agriculture - Richard Heinberg
# Secretary of Commerce (?)
# Secretary of Labor - Michael Moore
# Secretary of Health & Human Services (?)
# Secretary of Housing & Urban Development - James Kunstler
# Secretary of Transportation (?)
# Secretary of Energy - Matt Simmons
# Secretary of Education (?)
# Secretary of Veterans' Affairs (?)
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Unread postby JohnDenver » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 07:22:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'A')s we pass the Peak and the standard of living goes down everywhere, the old struggles that created different genetic races in the first place will be reasserted. Talented, capable, energetic people will find themselves out of work and frustrated, just like with the NSDAP in Germany in the 1930s, the original smalltimers and buffoons will be replaced with hardened, resolved, people. The BNP will be a force to be reckoned with.


Yah, I'm sure your nazi-inspired Gringo Power party is going to be a real force to reckon with, in California of all places. LOL. Maybe you should move someplace like Idaho where you're not in the minority.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Phil » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 07:48:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'Y')ah, I'm sure your nazi-inspired Gringo Power party is going to be a real force to reckon with, in California of all places. LOL. Maybe you should move someplace like Idaho where you're not in the minority.


The better strategy for Whites (and Northeast Asians) in California would be to leave, turn off the lights, and lock the door behind them. Later to return, and mount a coordinated attack on the weakened population (who will be drowning in their own cultural and genetic disposition for disorder, crime, corruption, violence, ignorance, and overall poor performance in technical pursuits and cognition- generally speaking.)
User avatar
Phil
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue 31 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, TX
Top

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 08:30:42

Denver ol' boy don't think I haven't thought about it.

The best policy is certainly to get out of southern california, normally a desert, and turn off the lights and the welfare checks.

I'm a native of California and I do think the nondesert parts of it are worth keeping and fighting for.

And, apparently others think so too, www.saveourstate.org

Oh, I read an Edward Abbey book over the weekend, Desert Solitaire, yep he makes comments that would get him attacked by the PC Police now.

Now, let's get back to some of the fine points of the BNP. They state in their strongly worded release that the new age will be one of nationalism not internationalism. That's a very important point. States were originally ethno-states, and will become so again. When you have huge multinational corporations running things, you want people to be as uniform as possible. Deracinated. Interchangeable parts of the machine.

However, international corporations and the governments they run are so clumsy down at the scale of individual humans, that what you end up with is a racial caste system. They say they're setting up a meritocracy, but frankly I think meritocracies scare the hell out of the rulers, that means they and their kids will have to compete with the brightest of the whole population. Much better to make sure they only have to compete with their prep-school buddies. And what better way to ensure no one else threatens them than by taking the smartest kids, generally whites, and setting things up so they have the least opportunities to go to college, get good jobs, etc? This shit is really going on - I have met many, many, many people who are guilty of the sin of being white, and wanted to become dentists or engineers or something. That's very much frowned upon in the US. Instead, import some engineers and doctors etc from some 3rd world cesspool who will have their loyalties, but certainly not to what's continually drummed into them, those evil white people.

These corporations are huge, brutal, machines. They chew up and spit out people, resources, ecosystems.

Now, are the BNP Fascist? Consider the definition of fascism - huge corporations and government united as one, Musso's original Corporatism. No, the BNP are not that, they're Folkish. They dare to say that the British Isles, lands too damp, cold, and sniffly for anyone else over history, ought to be the living space for the British people. Let's see, didn't a thug named Mandela get a Nobel prize or something for saying his land ought to be the home of his people and everyone else get out?

A real Folkish group isn't any more "fascist" in controlling an individual's life than the Amish social structure is in controlling their people. They live under very tight social control, but that's the culture of that Folk. No one goes around calling them "Fascist".

To live again sustainably, we're going to have to have a lot of "Fascist" rules to live by. Signs of greed and individual profit motive will have to be stamped out, like they are in all sustainable societies. The future isn't going to be a libertarian greedfest, or Farnam's Freehold. The future is folkish.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby julianj » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 09:27:27

The BNP is a micro party. Of course they are going to try to exploit the situation for their own ends. They are fascists.

But their general competence at doing anything other than beating up a few hapless asian shopkeepers is not that great.

Notice they can't even spell. Perhaps they're not quite the party with the intellectual and technical competence to restore the Uk post-peak. :lol:
The other place that believes completely in the right to keep and bear arms, particularly to use against foreign invaders and tyrants is: Afghanistan.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Unread postby venky » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 15:03:48

Fascism is not the answer however hopeless the situation might seem.

I dont believe in the end of liberalism (in the classical use of the word). I think its much too ingrained in our society for it to die, barring a total collapse which I think its unlikely.

On the other hand the BNP might make major political gains if there is a recession /depression. I personally think the party should be banned at the first oppurtunity. However cleverly they might fog and obfuscate their true agenda we know that they really are Nazi like in their thinking.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ere is our warning to you now. Those criminals, traitors, fools and fantasists that delay our rise to power will be treated as criminals when we take power. This Peak Oil situation will destroy our entire Nation and Western Civilisation unless the BNP are allowed to take power. The left and the liberals, the socialists and the environmentalists and the capitalists are all guilty of the same crime - of opposing the one part that can solve tis crisis , the one party that has the Wil and Vision to fight for our future.
[I]
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 15:59:08

There's no party in the US to match the BNP .... yet.

Have faith dear friend,

When the oil starts to run out EVERY political party will start sounding like the BNP, the only major difference will likely be the races defended...

It's important to rremember that modern liberalism and conservatism both are constructs alien to a world without cheap energy. This entire discussion couldn't even happen post-peak, except among a few scraggly, grey and grizzly survivors who will laughingly mention it over a BAR-B- Q'ed dog while armed guards stand steady and watchful nearby.

This bizaare concept of diverting massive national resources and spiritual love for the alien, offering help for the invaders, and institutionalizing near-worship for the 'outsider' was completely unknown among secular political interests until very recent history. Happily it will all disappear just as quickly as it began as we soon enter the post-peak era. Strangely, the BNP happens to be the only political party that has come to this realization and I applaud them for being the first.

If the CPUSA is the second party to come to this realization I will applaud them too. This era we are soon about to enter transcends petty party squabbles, and ALL political differences will soon appear 'petty'.
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby POAN » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 16:05:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', 'I') personally think the party should be banned at the first oppurtunity.


Great to live in a so called "democracy" isn't it? Who is the facist again? With attitudes like this sometimes I really wonder who really won the Second World War.

You either have freedom of speech for ALL or you simply do not have it! Sounds like something from George Orwell’s nightmare novel 1984 doesn’t it? But NO, this is Tony’s New Britain whereby another stepping stone towards that nightmare world is through this new “incitement to religious hatred” bill which states in no uncertain terms - the truth is no defence!
Ponder Voltaire’s words of a truly free world, “I may disagree with what you have to say but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it.”

I find it absolutely outrageous that in this so called ‘free’ country and today’s ‘free’ world, a world in which Tony Blair and his ilk are apparently spreading “Freedom of Speech” and “Democracy” to the rest of it, they are behind our backs taking away our freedom of speech and a fundamental democratic right!
I find it despicable that the leader of the BNP, Mr. Nick Griffin, could face up to 1 day, let alone 7 years, in prison for simply criticising Islam in a PRIVATE meeting. I would find it despicable if he faced this even if he said it at a public gathering for all to hear in Trafalgar Square.
User avatar
POAN
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby eastbay » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 16:24:06

I find it absolutely outrageous that in this so called ‘free’ country and today’s ‘free’ world, a world in which Tony Blair and his ilk are apparently spreading “Freedom of Speech” and “Democracy” to the rest of it, they are behind our backs taking away our freedom of speech and a fundamental democratic right!

I bet very few British soldiers would have served on Normandy Beach if they knew in advance what was to become of the UK.
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby venky » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 16:32:00

Those who do not believe in a democracy do not deserve its privleges. Doesn't the BNP aim for a fascist dictatorship?

Look, I dont care about the alleged racism of the BNP; I am not British and I have no intention of coming to the UK. I understand that immigration will cease post peak oil

Infact I was pretty impressed by your Peak Oil site. I new you were far right but and distrusted you on general principles, but I did not feel you deserved the label 'Naz'i. But the statement at new era invester, posted several times on this thread was just insane, no other way to describe it. Perhaps he doesn't speak for the party, but this reads like just out of the Mein Kampf 'We are going to fix you traitor leftwinger when we come to power'. If that is what the BNP thinks, then the chance of them coming to power is one Britain cannot afford to take.
Last edited by venky on Tue 19 Jul 2005, 15:55:08, edited 2 times in total.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby POAN » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 16:47:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', 'T')hose who do not believe in a democracy do not deserve its privleges. Does the BNP believe in democracy and equality?

Look, I dont care about the alleged racism of the BNP; I am not British and I have no intention of coming to the UK. I understand that immigration will cease post peak oil

Infact I was pretty impressed by your Peak Oil site. I new you were far right but and distrusted you on general principles, but I did not feel you deserved the label 'Naz'i. But the statement by Lee Barnes at new era invester, posted several times on this thread was completely insane. Perhaps he doesn't speak for the party, but this reads like just out of the Mein Kampf 'We are going to fix you traitor leftwinger when we come to power'. If that is what the BNP thinks, then the chance of them coming to power is one Britain cannot afford to take.


Hi venky,

The BNP IS ALL for democracy. In fact, I would go as far as to say that they are the ONLY party in the UK that truly stands for true democracy.

I am NO spokesperson for them at all though.

As for equality, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean that their is no difference between races/sexes, etc. full stop? What exactly is equality because as far as I know and as will any scientist tell you, it exists no where in nature.

I appreciate that you were impressed but it is NOT my site at all. Thank you for supporting my statement about the term Nazi being unjustifued, I respect you very much for that. As for being far-right - I am certainly not.

Infact, If you ever met me I am sure that I would surprise you greatly and for this reason I despise the negative and completly inaccurate drivel by the "mainstream" to class "us all" as right-wing, race-hating, knuckle dragging buffoons. I get on with everyone that I meet. I have never hate dand have no intention of it - far too much of a persons life is taken up by "hate" and I have no time for it. I love and that is all.

And what I have come to greatly respect on this forum is the maturity and open mindedness. It is truly fantastic.
User avatar
POAN
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby venky » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 17:04:03

As I said in the edited version of my post, does the BNP aim for a one-party dictatorship? My argument meant that if that's their aim then they dont deserve the right to free speech under a democracy. I dont claim that the motive of the BNP, I know little about the party apart from what I've read on the website and some of NicK Griffin's interviews.

But on the other hand, I know from the BNP website that they believe that the salvation of Britain depends on their coming to power. That's a dangerous ideological position. Also some of the comments posted by BNP members are extremely disturbing

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ere is our warning to you now. Those criminals, traitors, fools and fantasists that delay our rise to power will be treated as criminals when we take power. This Peak Oil situation will destroy our entire Nation and Western Civilisation unless the BNP are allowed to take power. The left and the liberals, the socialists and the environmentalists and the capitalists are all guilty of the same crime - of opposing the one party that can solve tis crisis , the one party that has the Will and Vision to fight for our future.


If the BNP is truly all for democracy then there would be no justification in banning them. Infact as I said before they would deserve any political gains as a result of talking about Peak Oil. But on the other hand if their aim is a one-party state, I think there is a good chance that they might be banned by the establishment if they look like coming to power, as they would represent a threat to the current establishment.
Last edited by venky on Tue 19 Jul 2005, 15:56:03, edited 1 time in total.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby EnergySpin » Mon 18 Jul 2005, 18:55:39

Before we enter this conversation about who is going to be banned or not, I think one should look at the political premises.
Since the American (and the French) revolution it is accepted that any individual is equal to the eyes of the state, has the same rights as any other person (including the right to express his political will by forming parties, participating in the democratic process, voting or being a candidate for a political post).
The basic premise of democracy is equality.
Anyone who says that there are some people more equal than others (as BNP does) is undemocratic. The usual trajectory of such parties (i.e. the Fascists of Mussolini, The Nazi party in Germany, and the Communist party in the USSR after the regime change in 1917) is to either deny the democratic process that brought them to power (i.e. Italy/Germany) or never really host a free election (because the population was not "mature").
Lets examine BNP's position using deductive logic (1st year college stuff)
1) Natural law is the supreme law
2) Equality is not natural
3) Democracy (at least the electoral system we have) is founded on equality
2+3 => Democracy is not natural => Democracy have to go (along with the 'tards')
By acknowledging that not people are equal, you begin a pathway to the abolition of democracy

Abolition of democracy in case BNP won the elections would have been a 2 step process:
A) A declaration of a state of emergency using a real or "facilitated" event leads to temporary postponement of elections, increasing the snooping powers of the police, doing away with constitutional protection
B) Down the road, revoke political rights to individuals who are not equal (i.e. members of other parties, women, people with dark skin complexion, poor people etc)
Then depending on the effectiveness of A over B you can either have
Germany post 1934 which had no elections or USSR/former communist states with a single party elections.
Soo predictable, I'm surprised people don't read their history books any more
Therefore, the BNP is a undemocratic party because it does not uphold the basic premise of democracy, hence it should be closely watched.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron