Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 03 Jul 2005, 00:58:01

Since we have many new members since I first posted this thread, I thought it apropos to revive it.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Sun 03 Jul 2005, 03:56:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The dollar is continuing it's decline


The dollar is having a bit of a resurgance at the moment (1.19 euros , low was 1.36 Euros , and 1.77 Pounds, low was 1.92)

Won't this keep the lid on inflation as imports become cheaper? [smilie=eusa_think.gif]

Or is the dollars revival temporary?. [smilie=eusa_think.gif]

Personally , I do not understand it [smilie=eusa_doh.gif] . The trade deficit is at a record but that doesn't seem to matter as long as the US interest rate > Euro interest rate ( 3.25% vs 2%?). Does this mean that as long as the US maintains a rate higher than the ECB it can run a large deficit forever? When does payback have to occur? [smilie=eusa_think.gif]

One more question, of the money borrowed to finance the trade deficit, who pays the interest on this?

I have a degree in Economics and it still confuses the **** out of me ! [smilie=eusa_wall.gif]

PB
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 03 Jul 2005, 13:19:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Permanently_Baffled', ' ')
The dollar is having a bit of a resurgance at the moment (1.19 euros , low was 1.36 Euros , and 1.77 Pounds, low was 1.92)


It's the euro that is declining. Long-term investors, especially high net worth families, are selling European assets as well as Euro-dollars, in bulk. In addition, global bond funds, which often hold a large portion of their assets in European debt, have slowly begun to move money into the US, Australia, and emerging markets. In the past as the dollar declined, it seemed prudent to diversify into other currencies...now they are not so sure that was a good move.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')on't this keep the lid on inflation as imports become cheaper?


The Fed doesn't think so, that's why they are continuing to raise short-term rates...not to mention the increasing cost of energy..whether that is in the CPI or not. 8)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')r is the dollars revival temporary?.


Yes, the high value of the dollar since the late 1990s has acted like a massive tax on U.S. exports and a huge subsidy to U.S. imports. As a result, although U.S. manufacturing firms have made substantial investments in new technologies and U.S. manufacturing workers have vastly increased their productivity, these achievements have not paid off in the face of foreign products that have been selling at deep, artificial discounts created by the overvalued dollar.

One reason the dollar has stayed so high relative to other currencies is that many governments either peg their exchange rates at artificially low values, or intervene heavily to keep their currencies undervalued relative to the dollar. This is an export-led growth strategy that fosters chronic trade surpluses with the United States and therefore effectively exports unemployment to this country's manufacturing sectors. This is why there is so much focus for China to revalue or float the yuan.

Countries keep their currencies undervalued (and the dollar overvalued) by buying up the excess supplies of dollars that enter their countries and holding them as foreign exchange reserves. As long as they buy our debt, this will continue. We could increasse our savings rate here, but as long as people feel they have all that equity in their over-valued, inflated homes...naw. :roll:


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he trade deficit is at a record but that doesn't seem to matter as long as the US interest rate > Euro interest rate ( 3.25% vs 2%?). Does this mean that as long as the US maintains a rate higher than the ECB it can run a large deficit forever? When does payback have to occur?


As long as the "carry trade" exists, where you can borrow short-term money at an interest rate less than the US long-term bond market (Japan) where you invest it at a profit, this will continue. Payback occurs when the cost of capital becomes too high or this "carry trade disolves due to a flight from dollar-denominated assets. The trade deficit assures this will correct. We don't know when.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne more question, of the money borrowed to finance the trade deficit, who pays the interest on this?


The trade deficit is the difference between what we sell and what we buy. It is not money borrowed at interest that must be serviced.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 03 Jul 2005, 13:35:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', ' ')The trade deficit assures this will correct. We don't know when.


Here are the three choices to correct the trade deficit.

1. Increase exports over 50%. :shock:

2. Increase the savings rate here so we don't have to borrow from foreign central banks. :roll:

3. Increase interest rates. 8O

#3 is what we are doing, along with protectionist legislation (tariffs). However, raising short-term rates is not having an effect in long-term rates (Greenspans's conundrum) as they are controlled by the international bond market and the "carry-trade" I spoke of before.

I know of no other mechanism to correct this deficit. If they raise rates too far or too fast, it will send us into a recession and collapse the housing market bubble.

Cross your little fingers! :lol:
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Sun 03 Jul 2005, 13:51:49

Thanks Monte , I appreciate your time in answering the questions. :)

The UK is currently using the interest rate weapon (4.25% currently from a low of 3.25% i think).

The result has been a "housing slow down" and drop in consumer spending.

The latter has spooked the Bank of England , since it maybe an indication of recession.

Therefore , the Bank of England is talking of dropping rates. Now this is despite the same inflationary worries and trade deficit issues as the US.

How on earth can the UK drop rates, when we are running a massive trade deficit? (in relation to population it isnt far off the US figure), and we are absorbing the same energy price increases (which are impacting inflation).

Of course this tactic (if valid) seems very short sighted since , once we decrease the interest rate then consumers are just going to borrow more and more until we reach another limit, consumer spending drops and so the interest rate has to come down again to free up more spending power.

Now this seems crazy because once rate do have to rise again becuase of the weaker pound and inevtiable inflation , more people are going to be in deep shit.

I just don't understand it...

PB
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England

Unread postby Macsporan » Mon 04 Jul 2005, 00:42:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'T')he stated US foreign policy is to maintain their military and economic dominance. Strategically, the United States needs to turn India and China into glass, that is their only option. There isn't enough military, cooperation, money or time to do anything else, if they wish to fulfill their foreign policy objectives.


At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious this would be suicide. Large scale use of nuclear weapons= nuclear winter= goodnight Irene.

Add this to the very strong possibility that the purported target just might lob a few back, and or the other nuclear powers (Russia's still got plenty), knowing that they're next, decide to unleash everything they have.
8O
That would certainly solve PO in a very swift and certain manner. In a few hundred thousand years thing'll be looking up.

Otherwise this particular strategy has nothing to recommend it.
User avatar
Macsporan
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia
Top

Hyperinflation and the housing market

Unread postby DoctorDoom » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 13:49:35

Well, I wonder if buying overpriced houses with lots of borrowed money might actually make sense if we are about to enter a stagflationary or even hyperinflationary period. Having money would be bad, having tangible assets and lots of low-interest debt would be good. Anyway it seems that a real-estate crash and high inflation are incompatible with each other. You could have the crash followed by high inflation, but probably not both at the same time.

I have wondered though if we might see some big swings in the relative values of real estate. In an oil-poor world, energy-efficient housing closer to the workplace should have greater relative value, inefficient mansions an hour's drive from work should have lesser relative value.

Of course if we enter a doomsday scenario the money flow could be to inflate the value of rural land and deflate urban/suburban land. That could happen to a point, but if it really starts looking that bad, who would trade their valuable rural land for worthless government paper anyway?
DoctorDoom
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun 20 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California

Re: Just can't accept this

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 15 Jul 2005, 17:57:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Petro', 'D')uring the '50 did the Japanese say: "Americans are pigs...they don't deserve our advanced mico-minature technology...let's not sell them (or the rest of the wold transistor radios)?

http://www.pbs.org/transistor/backgroun ... radio.html
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he first transistor radio was a joint project between the Regency Division of Industrial Development Engineering Associates and Texas Instruments. TI knew that it needed a fun product to catch the nation's attention. They thought a radio was just the thing to make a splash. TI built the transistors; Regency built the radio. On October 18, 1954, the Regency TR1 was put on the market. It was a scant five inches high and used four germanium transistors.

...skip...

While the Regency sold out everywhere, it didn't stay on the market. Texas Instruments caused the sensation it wanted and then moved on to other things.

But over in Japan, a tiny company had other ideas. A tape recorder manufacturer called Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo had also decided to make small radios. In fact, they were going to devote their whole company to commercial products like that.

Tsushin Kogyo was close to manufacturing its first radios when it heard that an American company had beaten them to the punch. But they kept up the hard work, eventually producing a radio they named the TR-55. When Regency quit producing the TR1, in the Spring of 1955, the Japanese company was poised to enter the US market.

The only problem was that the company name was unprouncable for Americans. They needed a new name. Ibuka and his partner Akio Morita thought and thought. First, they found a latin word sonus meaning "sound." That was a good start. At the time, bright young men were referred to as "sonny boys," and that was a good image too. Combining the two concepts, they developed a new name: Sony.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 15:47:11

Well, let's see how things are panning out.

On December 13, 2004, I posted this thread and made this prediction;

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ince virtually all commodities use petroleum fuel to move from production to consumption, as fuel prices rise whether by market forces or by currency decisions by OPEC to offset the loss in revenue as the dollar declines due to our trade imbalance, all commodity prices must also rise. Whew! What a mouthful! This will create inflation. To curb the inflation, the Fed will raise interest rates.


Oil in December : $41.01

Oil is now: $57.80

Interest rates on December 13, 2004 were: 2.18%
Interest rates July 3, 2005 : 3.36%

From the intitial post, my next prediction:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.


Currently, the CPI does not include food/energy so the inflation is "hidden." The 20 year bond is 4.35%, as the short-term rate approaches the long-term rate, the carry trade will be risky to investors. How long can low interest rates and easy credit fuel our consumption and GDP growth?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 19:48:54

The Federal Reserve has outsourced another American job. China will now dictate the value of the U.S. dollar. The raising of long-term interest rates is now the providence of China. In the short-term especially, the U.S. trade deficit will rise. Why you ask? As the dollar drops our exports become cheaper. Won’t that narrow the deficit?

No, this small devaluation will not move the factories that make the products American’s consume back here; we will just pay more for them. The U.S. trade deficit exists because the factories that produce the real production are increasingly in other countries. We cannot compete with third-world wages making first world products.

Americans cannot go on borrowing from foreign central banks to buy Chinese goods forever. To fix this imbalance, we must do one of three things:

1. Export more and import less.
2. Increase the US savings rate. Borrow at home.
3. Increase interest rates.

The FED tried raising short-term rates as I predicted. It didn’t work; created Greenspan's "conundrum." So now they pulled off a new tact; get the Chinese to raise them for us. Now this has some far-reaching consequences.

When the Chinese revalued the yuan, more than US$200 billion of purchasing power was lost. That $200 billion is the decline in value of U.S. dollar M-3 alone; a broad measure of money supply. If you had your money in dollar denominated assets on the morning of July 20, 2005, you were 2% poorer by the time you left for work.

Here’s what I predicted on Dec 13, 2004:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'A')nd as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.


Here’s what Peter Schiff is C.E.O. and Chief Global Strategist at Euro Pacific Capital, Inc. predicted today as a result of the revaluation::

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1'). Higher consumer prices.
2. Higher interest rates.
3. Reduced profits for American companies, particularly those dependent on domestic consumption and consumer debt.
4. Lower stock prices, as earnings decline and multiples contract.
5. The busting of the housing bubble, as tighter credit standards and higher interest rates squeeze current home prices.
6. Rising unemployment, as higher interest rates and vanishing home equity slow consumer spending and reduce jobs dependant on that spending.
7. A severe recession as a result of all of the above.
8. Rising federal budget deficits, as recession reduces tax revenue, while higher interest rates and escalating outlays increase expenditures.

Link
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby Dezakin » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 16:35:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, this small devaluation will not move the factories that make the products American’s consume back here; we will just pay more for them. The U.S. trade deficit exists because the factories that produce the real production are increasingly in other countries. We cannot compete with third-world wages making first world products.

Your protectionist US-centric rhetoric is as boring as it is inaccurate, as well as being at odds with your other views. I'm finding it difficult to see what you're arguing except perhaps 'America is going down!'

We've seen the threat of the rise of China in the rise of Japan in the 80's and the rise of the post-war european economies in the 60's, and still US manufacturing capacity has actually grown year on year for the past century, and even the last decade. The only thing that is being lost is manufacturing jobs.

You seem to misrepresent all economic data to illustrate doom thats nonexistant, and apparently Riccardian comparative advantage just doesn't happen in your universe.

There is a housing bubble, but when it pops it wont spell the implosion of the US economy. The dollar is overvalued with respect to the yuan, but when it adjust it wont spell the end of the US economy either. Everything you see you believe more fragine than a soap bubble, and that just isn't the case.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 26 Jul 2005, 17:41:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, this small devaluation will not move the factories that make the products American’s consume back here; we will just pay more for them. The U.S. trade deficit exists because the factories that produce the real production are increasingly in other countries. We cannot compete with third-world wages making first world products.

Your protectionist US-centric rhetoric is as boring as it is inaccurate, as well as being at odds with your other views. I'm finding it difficult to see what you're arguing except perhaps 'America is going down!'


I am not a protectionist, nor do I support that view. My statements reflect the consensus of the leading financial markets and the raw facts.

If not for the dollar hegemony, we would already be down. So far, my predictions from Dec 2004 have been spot on. My track record speaks for itself. I misrepresent nothing.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 16:38:04

Here’s what I predicted on Dec 13, 2004:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.


Gas prices alone are causing the budgets to change. Even "tipping your waitress" is being cut out.

Gas gripes: readers speak up Readers weigh in on how rising prices at the pump have taken a toll on their lives.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')I am a waitress and my husband works at a lumber yard. He commutes 35 miles round trip every day, 5 days a week. I work at a huge truck stop. Not only are we paying a lot more for gas, my tips are suffering badly. Truck drivers are paying sky-high prices for diesel and guess what, leaving a tip for dinner is an option that they are choosing to do away with. I'm paying more for groceries and everything else, and making less money."

Link

And then there is heating oil and natural gas following on the heels of this summer's steep prices at the pump.

Winter forecast for heating homes: costly

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or low-income individuals, the prospect of higher heating prices is daunting. "Combined with the price of gasoline, low-income people are getting battered," says Jim Nolan, director of the Montana's energy assistance program in Helena.

One of those is Annette Hayden, a resident of Lewistown, Mont. Ms. Hayden, a working single mother with two young boys, is already behind on her utility bill from the summer. "I owe Northwestern Energy $135, and I am paying them $50 to $75 now," she says. "I just can't pay in full."

Like many low-income wage earners, Hayden uses the federal earned-income tax credit to pay off her bills. She also receives help from the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). But two years ago, she got so far behind that the utility threatened to turn off her electricity. "I went to a local church to get $300," she says.


Link

Unemployment is hard to gauge as the books are "cooked". Tell will tell very soon. The carry trade and the housing bubble are still fueling the consumption.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby Snowrunner » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 20:30:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('savethehumans', 'W')ish I could believe in a slow descent, too....

Unfortunately, the US economic system, followed by the world economic system, is about to collapse. Social/political upheavals will follow. And producing even sustainable amounts of fossil fuels will become more and more problematic (as problematic as the regions where most of them are found!).

This isn't going to be slow.

Next decade officially begins January 1, 2011. Wonder what the world will be like by then....


I think one thing many USians don't understand is how much they are indebted to countries like China.

If China really believes that they are threatend by the US they can easily pull the plug: dump their Dollar Reserves and Bonds onto the open market and see the US be bankrupt before breakfast.

Ironically enough: China will probably get out pretty good in this, because even IF the US defaults on their loans (which is a given) they still have all the infrastructure that all those multinationals have built there over the past 5 years.

Meanwhile the US has pretty much nothing, sold all the manufacturing to other countries, fired the people and is now broke and can't afford to retool any of the factories (if they still exist).

So: PO is going to be slow, but that doesn't mean that the US can find itself very quickly at the bottom of the barrel.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Unread postby Snowrunner » Thu 25 Aug 2005, 20:45:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', '
')We've seen the threat of the rise of China in the rise of Japan in the 80's and the rise of the post-war european economies in the 60's, and still US manufacturing capacity has actually grown year on year for the past century, and even the last decade. The only thing that is being lost is manufacturing jobs.


What about farm jobs? The only things really that are still being made in the US (or may western nations for that matter) are products that are "time critical".

The last Computer I bought from Apple shipped from China, that wasn't a cheap Mac Mini, but rather a Powerbook for serious dough.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou seem to misrepresent all economic data to illustrate doom thats nonexistant, and apparently Riccardian comparative advantage just doesn't happen in your universe.


Just a suggestion: Go to your local $store and have a look at the merchandise, see where it comes from, if you get a chance, go into a major distribution center for say, Walmart etc. and have a look at all those boxes and see where they originate.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here is a housing bubble, but when it pops it wont spell the implosion of the US economy. The dollar is overvalued with respect to the yuan, but when it adjust it wont spell the end of the US economy either. Everything you see you believe more fragine than a soap bubble, and that just isn't the case.


Two things are keeping the US right now afloat:

1. China needs more time to bring more people from the land into the cities and "prosper" more.
2. The US is STILL the biggest market and Oil is still being traded in USD.

There already has been some rumbling about changing from USD to Euro (and some countries actually have started doing this, granted, those are the ones that don't like the US at all, like, say Iraq, Cuba or North Korea), but the reality is that even OPEC had a slip up or two where they were contemplating this.

Right now the US has a VERY sweet deal, you print the money and get goods for it for practically nothing. Where do people have to go to spend the money? Right, back into the US.

With the increasing defecit though the desire of people to invest money in the US will decrease, especially if they don't think they can get a reeturn for their money, or the USD turns into Monopoly money.

If I'd live in the US right now I'd be afraid, very afraid. Peak Oil (I agree) will be a slow process, with some ups and downs, but there are some VERY serious threats that exist today for the US economy and the moment either OPEC or China decide to pull the plug watch yourself going down the drain.

What scenarios would cause this?

1. Warning shot by china.

If the US continues it saber ratteling they may just dump some of their reserves as a "warning", a good motivation for this would be Taiwan that still only exists because of US protection.

2. China needs more oil.

Again, it could just dump SOME of the USD reserves onto the market, and maybe buy Euros instead. China will be the second largest oil importer soon (if not already) and there are still more people living in China than in all of North America, if China wants oil and can pay OPEC in a good way, why stick with the USD?

When (not if) the housing bubbles burst and the economy does go into a recession (or even depression) China will look for other ways to sell their goods and services, and if the US is not a major contributor anymore and is already on the floor, why not knock 'em out by dumping all of your USD reserves and other investments, deal a couple of years with the rest of the world, then pick up the pieces and move on.

America isn't so much threatened by terrorists, but by her own gluttony over the years.
User avatar
Snowrunner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 795
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Screwed
Top

Possible cycle

Unread postby kevincarter » Sat 27 Aug 2005, 13:27:06

I’m trying to draw a picture of the cycle that we’ll see soon; can anyone help me to draw it better? Thanks!

{I merged your thread with mine. See my initial post. MQ}

Prices of gas will keep increasing and people will just keep paying more. Over here people do not commute so many hours a day and they have some money left once their basic expenses are covered. So people will keep paying more to get to their offices, they just don’t know how much are they willing to pay for gas. 2 euros per liter, 4, 8, 16 euros per liter? They will pay, no matter how angry and frustrated they get, they will pay. But there is someone who won’t pay, and that someone is the truck driver, because once the amount that he has to spend exceeds the amount he gets he will stop working. So prices on everything will rise and distribution will start again. Then people will not only have to spend crazy money in gas but crazy money in food too, so they will keep life simple, not spending on anything else than fixed expenses (food, gas, mortgage etc…) many shops will have to close leaving many unemployed. By that time there will be a good amount of people bankrupt, those who can will move with relatives, those who can not will become beggars or criminals. Gas will keep increasing, everyone who can get rid or reduce his fuel expense to go to work will do it, except the rich or the dumb. By that time everyone will be extra angry and irritated, anxiety, depression, stress rates will grow exponentially. I guess by coincidence or economic law (I’m no expert) the interest rate will increase, many won’t be able to pay for their overpriced homes. Gas prices up again, truck drivers have to stop again, farmers have to stop this time too, prices increase again. Now there is a lot of people who just can’t make it till the end of the month. More go bankrupt, those who can move with their relatives, those who can not become beggars or criminals.

The cycle always leaves with more beggars and criminals, how long does it take you to fall into those categories is a matter of time, savings, kind of job that you have and how PO ready you are. To my eyes is all about being able to get your own food, cutting the crap and keeping things simple. I also find wise to stay away from large amounts of population.

Critics, amendments, and extra info are welcomed.
kevincarter
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu 04 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Possible cycle

Unread postby gordito » Sat 27 Aug 2005, 13:58:14

Well, you are already seeing the signs with Walmart's lower profit statements, the increase in filing for bankruptcies, drive-offs and theft of gas and even rolling blackouts in California. My best guess is that we will see a terrible Holiday season for all the retailers, including the big-box stores. I work at the Customer Service department of a large bank handling credit cards for all the major oil companies and many calls are to cancel cards in order for them to organize finances or credit increases because of gas prices. So people will keep spending on essentials like food, gas, mortgage and cut out things like vacations and nifty tech toys. Also, I expect that the banks and credit card companies will take a hit as people simply stop paying for their credit bills and just chop up the cards.
User avatar
gordito
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Thu 01 Sep 2005, 01:50:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'A')nd as the price of food and other essential commodities rise--along with house payments tied to variable rate mortgages--luxuries and dispensable goods and services will drop out of the family budgets and the standard of living will decline and unemployment will rise.


Fears rise that U.S. standard of living falling

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ASHINGTON - U.S. workers are dissatisfied with the economy and fear their standard of living is declining, according to a survey released Tuesday by the AFL-CIO.

The labor organization's survey of 805 workers found widespread dissatisfaction with their economic situation, even as other indexes show rising consumer confidence and a more plentiful job market.

Rising health care costs, gasoline prices and job outsourcing weighed on the minds of those surveyed by the AFL-CIO.

Seventy percent of those surveyed said their salaries are not keeping pace with rising costs, and 69 percent said most new jobs do not offer good pay or benefits.


Link
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby elizabethlea » Thu 01 Sep 2005, 10:33:30

MonteQuest - we live in Australia and are being hurt by higher and higher grocery bills - every month we have to make our money go farther. But no one's talking about inflation that I am aware of....

Anyway just wanted to let you know we feel the pain over here too. :cry:
User avatar
elizabethlea
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed 31 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: Post Peak Oil; The Slow Decline?

Unread postby marko » Tue 01 Nov 2005, 22:40:29

Good thread, Monte. My feeling is that the decline will be gradual over the long run, but that in the short run we will experience it at least partly as a series of economic collapses, probably accompanied by political instability. As I will argue, these economic collapse and political instability (or warfare) will tend to prevent us from investing in conservation or more sustainable energy technologies.

I am thinking specifically of the financial disaster that awaits us when interest rates rise or the US economy deteriorates to the point where large numbers of people are no longer able to make their monthly debt (mortgage/credit card) payments. When this happens, you will see real estate prices and consumer spending collapse, and many banks will be in serious trouble. The stock market will crash, the federal budget deficit will go through the roof. Because the drop in demand will cut the current account deficit, our foreign creditors will have insufficient dollars to fund the federal budget deficit. At that point, either interest rates go through the ceiling to attract buyers (at which point the government might no longer be able to service its debt) or the Fed prints money to buy the federal debt and the dollar collapses, very likely with a rush for the exits by the East Asian central banks. Either outcome steepens the economic decline.

When (not if) we have this economic depression, energy consumption and energy prices will drop without much new effort to conserve or develop renewable (or any non-fossil fuel energy). So that if the global economy begins to creep back upward, it will be on the basis of the same old petroleum-centered and energy-efficient technologies that drove up prices the last time around. And then prices will rise to the point where they bring another economic collapse. Energy prices will fall again, and profits will be too low for the private sector to invest in energy technologies that might allow a more sustainable economic recovery.

However, the severe economic stress that will result from these economic collapses will create public unrest not only in the US but in China and elsewhere. The rich and powerful in many countries will be looking for scapegoats and a way to get the angry young men off the streets. In the past, these circumstances have often given rise to wars. Either political unrest or warfare would tend to further limit investment in a new energy regime.

This cycle may repeat itself multiple times and limit investment in a sounder energy regime. As a result, our civilization is likely to unravel in potentially very dangerous ways.
User avatar
marko
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Massachusetts

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests

cron