Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Zero Point Energy (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 10 Jul 2005, 17:44:40

Interesting post. Zero point energy could be fairly well understood in the realm of classified physics, but it's not anything we're going to see any time soon. Free energy would doom humanity. Expensive energy applies brakes to growth, teaches people what they're basically here to learn-- that they have to operate within limits.

What is true in the personal and social realm is equally true when applied to our relationship with the natural world. There is a moral if not spiritual component to energy. Taken further into the military realm, the moral failure of humanity in a free energy environment would logically lead to exotic arms production. You really want to see a survivalist with a nasty attitude and a bunch of handguns, in a world of free energy? He'd have all the energy in the world at his disposal, on a planet devoid of water, animals, plants, after the human population explosion. Zero point energy, if available to the public, would equal zero eco-system, zero planet, zero us.

As far as ufos go, I'll take the words of Edgar Mitchell, the late Gordon Cooper and Story Musgrave, three respected astronauts, over any yahoo with compelling but ultimately useless psycho-social theories. If paying heed to the most highly trained observers on the planet is psychological ratcheting, we have a problem here. The condescending attitudes embodied in the dominant epistemologies of our times, ones that pathologize witnesses of events that are poorly understood, says much more about the debunker than the sincere witness. He is a mundane thinker- he is sensitive to social pressure- he is a careerist who toes the line, living a delusion, thinly veiled by a guaze of intellectual arrogance.

The ufo phenomenon demands more open and intense scrutiny, not dismissal. Political deconstructionism is applied to every social/political topic, but this one, and that's a shame, because anyone wishing to approach this topic from this angle will be engaged and enlightened.

Albente, There are some highly credentialed, highly placed individuals who are very interested in the esoteric. Why be ashamed of ufo interest? What happened to you? PM me, if you like.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby Novus » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 20:38:34

I did some more research into the antiquities of ZPE. I found this interesting carving from the Hypostyle Hall of Karnak.

Image

What are those things? The Egyptologists do not know. The pot shaped object on the right appears to be a clay battery. Wires coming out of the pot power some type of electrical device.

This carving was found in the Hypostyle Hall which has a little known wonder of engineering. There is a 100 ton stome placed 70 feet in the air on top of the most massive collumns in the world. The stone is still sitting there 3500 years after it was set.

Image

The Egyptologists give the same standard answer of how the Hypostyle hall was built as they do for every other wonder of the ancient world. That is thousands of slaves toiling away on ropes compelled by merciless task masters. Using the sugested techniques of ramps and rigging this stone is impossible even with thousands of slaves.

I beleive the carving above explains the true technique for lifting the stone. The Egyptians had built a harmonic anti-gravity device similar to Ed Leedskalnin's generator. The construction of the Hypostyle Hall was seen as a miracle from Amon Ra and proof that the Pharaoh was a living god. If it was built by slaves how would it be a miricle? It would only seen as a miricle if the Pharaoh and his priests built it themselves. They could have lifted it if they knew about sacred geometry.

Image

The Egyptions weren't the only ones who knew about sacred geometry. It is also mentioned in the bible to perform another miricle of construction. It was writen that Solomon's temple was constructed with sacred knowledge from God. This knowledge was intrusted to just a few stone laborers who became the guild of Masons. The only purpose for the existance of the free masons after the temple was built is to keep this knowledge secret. The guild of Free Masons has been responsible for the construction of all the great stone wonders of Europe since biblical times. The secret of their trade can be seen in their symbol of a compass and square which is used in a process of squaring the circle to calculate the sacred geometry to move the greatest of blocks. Sacred geometry associated with harmonic anti-gravity is the trade secret the Free Masons have been hiding for all these centuries.

This fits another piece of the ZPE puzzel together.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby EnergySpin » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 21:09:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'c')ompass and square which is used in a process of squaring the circle to calculate the sacred geometry to move the greatest of blocks

By the way, squaring the circle with these tools is a mathematical impossibility. There is an elegant proof from the 19th century. A less formal way to see why it is impossible, goes back to the school formula for the circle circumference. Pi is an irrational number and cannot be produced by any finite operation of segment subdivision.
So ... they might have had Zero Energy devices but there is no way they could have squared the circle :)
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby J-Rod » Wed 13 Jul 2005, 22:27:26

For some good reads on stuff like the tubes you posted Novus, google around for Zecharia Sitchin. He's written exhaustive works on the accomplishments of ancient man, and all the knowledge that stemmed from Sumeria, as well as tried to tackle the mystery of why civilization seemed to actually regress from the Sumerian times. Nothing dealing with ZPE, more with theories of the origins of humanity. Of course it's not without alot of skeptics, but I've read several of his books, and I found them to be pretty good. Alot of his points come from his own translations of texts, and of course translations can be biased... or maybe google "Annunaki" - "Those who from heaven to Earth came."

http://tinyurl.com/87sa7

http://www.sitchin.com/

I am sure you can find more.
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Unread postby aldente » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 02:42:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')Zero point energy, if available to the public, would equal zero eco-system, zero planet, zero us.


Wrong!
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 12:32:58

Albente, Sorry, a one word rebuttal won't do. Explain why infinite energy on a finite planet, wouldn't be a dangerous thing for humanity. Go ahead. Take your best shot.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby aldente » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 13:36:41

I am willing to change my point on that. I had my doubts as well to be honest when thinking the process through and came to the conclusion that the existing systems (economic, political etc.) only would abuse ZPE under the premise of their short sightged motifs that they operate under.
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Squaring the Circle

Unread postby Novus » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 20:31:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '
')By the way, squaring the circle with these tools is a mathematical impossibility. There is an elegant proof from the 19th century. A less formal way to see why it is impossible, goes back to the school formula for the circle circumference. Pi is an irrational number and cannot be produced by any finite operation of segment subdivision.
So ... they might have had Zero Energy devices but there is no way they could have squared the circle :)


Well let me introduce you to sacred geometry where you can square the circle and the value of Pi.

This is in a nut shell how you square a circle. Usa a compass and draw any size circle.

Image

Lift up the needle and swing the compass around and draw another circle of the same size. The two circles should intersect at two points. Draw a circle of the same size at each of the points and you should get something that looks like this.

Image

Shade in the four large arcs and you have the surface area of a squared circle.

Image

It is exactly equal to the square of the radius of circle times Pi.

Image

This is how the Eygptians were able to build the Pyramid as a perfect square. Not only is it also the most perfect square ever built, it is also more perfectly aligned to true north then any other building. How? Because they squared the circle. It sould be imposible to aligne the square Pyramid to the circular Earth perfectly but the Egyptians did it to a degree of acturacy we cannot reproduce today. Over the couse of a year the sun will actually trace squared circular path of three sides of the Pyramid in shadow. This is true absolute prefect north.

Image

It is no wonder or suprize to me that the Egyptians could understand the priciples of ZPE and harmonic anti-gravity.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Brandon » Fri 15 Jul 2005, 21:07:21

Egyptians, Ed Leedskalnin, and other builders of ancient massive structures likely used an ancient cement. Not ZPE. Not antigravity. The proof is in the analysis of the "stone". Hairs embedded inside the stone. Internal structures not consistent with normal stone.

Download and watch the second video on this page (13.8 MB):
http://www.geopolymer.org/science_archa ... _made.html

On Proving Ancient Megalith Construction:
http://slimebug.home.comcast.net/megaliths.html

Seems reasonable to me.
User avatar
Brandon
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Tampa, FL

Unread postby J-Rod » Sat 16 Jul 2005, 01:34:10

Wow, great link. I really like the presentation of the cement molds. Makes perfect sense, based on all the evidence shown.
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Unread postby katkinkate » Sat 16 Jul 2005, 02:36:26

Pity they didn't give a more exact recipe for do-it-yourself stones. Would make great garden borders. You could create your own stonework garden and impress the neighbours.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Unread postby Novus » Sat 16 Jul 2005, 12:09:45

Ancient cement is nonsence. Ed used Coral which is made out of dead sea creatures. You cannot grind up coral and use cement to reform it and preserve the skeletal structure of the coral. It is like saying you can reform a cow out of hamburger.

The Egyptians carved all their stones. We have proof they were carved because we know where the stones were quarried. They even left some unfinished stones behind such as the Aswan oblisk.

Image
Image
Image

The stone cracked so it was abandoned. If they had ancient cement why didn't they just fix the crack or bother carving the stone in the first place?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ncient cement avoids a timeline violation because it is fully capable of participating in construction of the Trilithon. The natural progression of knowledge is maintained because our knowledge of the physics of lifting has advanced from ancient times as would be expected. Today we can lift and precisely place far more cement than ancient man by using machines that have far less capability than NASA's crane. Hoover Dam is proof.


Jim Solley obviously has a problem that the ancients could create wonders modern man can't. So he writes a big long article devoid of facts and rife with untruth to belittle the achievements of the ancients.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby J-Rod » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 08:22:09

If you bothered to read the article, it explains that the aggregate used to make the cement was quarried from right there.... As well as they have found organics that really shouldn't have been in natural carved limestone, such as human hairs. As well it explains the 30,000 stone pitchers and statues made out of material that is so hard even sculptors today wouldn't touch it, and there's not a tool mark to be found. It's very likely that casting and the associated chemistry was a secret that the Egyptians held. Sorry if that theory doesn't hold well with your ZPE explaination. Sometimes a good answer ends up being simple...
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Unread postby Novus » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 11:35:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('J-Rod', 'I')f you bothered to read the article, it explains that the aggregate used to make the cement was quarried from right there.... As well as they have found organics that really shouldn't have been in natural carved limestone, such as human hairs. As well it explains the 30,000 stone pitchers and statues made out of material that is so hard even sculptors today wouldn't touch it, and there's not a tool mark to be found. It's very likely that casting and the associated chemistry was a secret that the Egyptians held. Sorry if that theory doesn't hold well with your ZPE explaination. Sometimes a good answer ends up being simple...


I read that article over a year ago. I have been researching the technologies of the ancients for years now and ancient cement is an insult to all their achievments.

Ancient cement is contrary to the facts at hand.

1. Coral cannot be gound up into aggregate and reformed. Coral is a living organism with a complex skeletal structure that it leaves behind when it dies. If you grind up coral skeletons into aggregate you will lose that skeletal stucture and be left with just calcium carbonate.

2. Marble also has a texture that you would lose if it was ground up into aggregate. If you ground up the below piece of marble and reformed it, then it would not look the same. The Greeks and Romans did have cement technologies but it was not used as a substitute for Marble construction and carving.

Image

3. If you grind up limestone and turn it into aggregate then you get plaster. The ancients did know about the use of plaster but the pyramids are obviously not made of plaster. Hair is commonly used to strenghen plaster because it lacks the strength of living limestone. Hair has NEVER been found in the living limestone blocks used to build the Pyramids, Karnak, Aswan, or Baalbeck. The unfinished Aswan Obelisk is undeniable Proof the stones were carved.

4. Think about Ancient Cement from a thermodynamics prespective. If you grind up a material then you increase its' entropy and weaken the material. To say that ancient cement is just as strong carved blocks violated the laws of thermodynamics just as much as ZPE does.

Think about it.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby J-Rod » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 12:58:52

The article specifically dealt with the aggregate, saying that if you soaked the soft limestone in water, after 24 hours the limestone seperates, and the shells are left intact. They also made a test batch using the same chemical formulas derived from the stelae and heiroglyphs. It reformed into the pyramid shown here, strong as any natual formed hard variety of limestone, with shells intact.

http://tinyurl.com/96rd5

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n October 1991, during the shooting of the TV production “ This Old Pyramid ” by NOVA, aired on the American PBS network on September 1992, Prof. Davidovits had the opportunity to present this unique property of the Giza limestone. A chunk of limestone taken in the quarry was very easily disaggregated within 24 hours, leaving the nummulites and the clay gently separated from each other, whereas a chunk of the hard Mokkatam limestone did not disintegrate at all.


Image

Image

All those shells are obviously wholly intact. I think you might have glossed over the pertinent parts of the article dealing with the advanced chemical knowledge of the ancients, in your bias of *knowing* the ancients used ZPE and not chemistry in their achievments. Just my .02 =]

Novus, do you use IRC at all? Or any type of IM software? I think it might be interesting to have a direct chat with you, and we can let this thread die, it's drifted a bit off from the original topic. :) I'm off to go read some more on the comet info, seems like there's alot more than meets the eye there as well, I think that got touched on in another thread on this board.
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio
Top

Unread postby Novus » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 16:25:12

Yes, this thread has gotten a little off topic. This thread is really about modern ZPE achievments not the achievments of the ancients. I don't really want this thread to die because in a few weeks I will only have to create another one when the next ZPE breakthrough comes along.

So getting back on topic.

In the latest ZPE news Kofi Annan visited Nicholas Moller's Research & Development Lab in Fontainebleau, France. There he demonstrated the MAHG producing an EROEI of 21 and the Lifter project.

The lifter project has been sucessully reproduced and documented 317 times. The lifter project demonstrates how the Casimir Force can used to produce levitation.

Kofi Annan was so impressed by the research of Moller's lab that he wrote this letter of recommendation.

Image
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Sunspot » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 18:55:20

Didn't read most of these posts. Let's just make this real simple: build your widget, put it in a black box if you want, bring it over here and put it in my basement. I'll disconnect from the grid, and if I can still watch TV, then you've got something!
There is a misconception out there that "Science" is opposed to all these alternative energy schemes. But all it takes is a clear demonstration that something actually works and, I guarantee you, scientists will be interested. And it's not necessary to demonstrate to the nth atom just how it works, if it works then we'll run with it.
Too many of these schemes are just people looking to suck down some research money. Beats workin' for a living....
User avatar
Sunspot
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Weare, NH

Unread postby eric_b » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 19:05:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'Y')es, this thread has gotten a little off topic. This thread is really about modern ZPE achievments not the achievments of the ancients. I don't really want this thread to die because in a few weeks I will only have to create another one when the next ZPE breakthrough comes along.

So getting back on topic.

In the latest ZPE news Kofi Annan visited Nicholas Moller's Research & Development Lab in Fontainebleau, France. There he demonstrated the MAHG producing an EROEI of 21 and the Lifter project.

The lifter project has been sucessully reproduced and documented 317 times. The lifter project demonstrates how the Casimir Force can used to produce levitation.

Kofi Annan was so impressed by the research of Moller's lab that he wrote this letter of recommendation.


Gawd.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the MAHG device is BULLSHIT.

Casmir 'force' is interesting, but hardly germane as far a creating useful
amounts of energy.

The concept behind the MAHG device is combining individual hydrogen atoms
(atomic hydrogen) into molecular hydrogen (H2) releases more energy
than is lost dissociating H2 back to atomic hydrogen. This contradicts all known
thermodynamic laws. So where does this extra energy come from? Supposedly
those tricky little hydrogen atoms act as 'pumps', pulling energy from the ZPE
vacuum before releasing it when recombining.

Ya. Whatever. Sounds like perpetual motion to me.

Never mind that the infamous J. L. Naudin is behind these claims. The same
person who allegedly created a working MEG device (another device based
on 'ZPE').

I used to be a member of the yahoo 'MEG_builders' group. These people were
trying to duplicate the claims of Tom Bearden (theory begind the MEG device)
and J.L. Naudin (creator of a (supposedly) working device). Got an email this
weekend from someone who actually 'walked the walk' and attempted to duplicate
the results of Naudin and create a working MEG device. His results were negative.
I'm quoting the entire email - from Pascal_di_SCALA (despite being French
his English is excellent...)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Hello everybody

I recall everybody that the MEG I work with is the same as J.L.
Naudin 3.1 one:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm

All my mast year experimentations here:
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/meg/expe.php

There is only two differencies with Naudin'one: magnet and power
supply is not the same. In effect my magnet was a stack of 10 disc
rare earth element magnets, 5mm diameter. And my power supply is a
fix 30V output, 1A max. Specifications are those of Naudin.

All my tests were negative, power calculations were very poor, with
COP less than 0.5, no overunity. A big problem was that I had not
sinusoidal signals for currents and voltages at all. And when my
load was a MOV, there was a phase angle and calculations have proven
that power out was little.

I have bought a new magnet and made new experiments. My magnet has
been specifically designed to fit the MEG C core (very expensive
magnet), in rare earth elements. Density flux is 1.2 Tesla, less
than saturation core in theory.

I have taken in account the fact that as described in Bearden
papers, input coils must be feed with currents signals that produce
magnetic fields that contrary the one of magnet. In effect, one of
my input coil was not correctly oriented. I corrected this.

All experiments I made these last days are negative again.
I mesured input signals in the primary coils, I signals are not what
they should be. They should be square signals, 30V and 0V, when one
primary coil is fed, the other one must not be.
My control board is exactly the same thant JL Naudin's one, my
primary coils are wounded with the same number of turns, and the
same wire that he specified, but my input signals are not the same
that his.

I saw that input signals were excatly what I waited for when
changing operating frequency (frequencies beetween 1700Hz and
5000Hz); but completely deformed at JL Naudin's control board
operatingfrequencies (between 17 000 Hz and 50 000 Hz). I mesured
plate 30V and some pics to -80V at higher frequencies, not enough to
have a plate (and it's not 0V).

Induced back currents in primary coils (when FET basculates) is the
cause of these perturbations. I have tried too solutions.
First one, a diode in parallel with my primary coils (in the
opposite way). But too many currents was flowing through, and this
lead to an excess input consumption. I have added a resistor with my
diode, but when the resistor was some kOhm, it was too much in
comparison with primary coil impedance at operating frequency, so
induced back currents were not going through the diode but through
the coil, and a too small resistor led to a high power consumption.
The input signal was correct with a diode.

Second solution: a capacitor in parallel with my primary coil
instead of a diode; few nF (ranging from 10 to 30 nF). This
stabilised my negative pics at higher frequencies and my input
signal was then acceptable: plate 30V and half sin from 30V to -60V.
I used this montage.

With this correct input signals, my output was different: always
sinusoidal output, for a resistive load or a MOV load.
So the reason why last year I never mesured sinusoidal waves is that
control board is not properly designed for operating frequencies
from 17KHz to 50KHz; but Naudin says he measured his sin waves at
20KHz approx. with his control board. How has he done, it's not
possible?

With my correct input signals, my correct primary coil orientation
so magnetic field of the coil contrary magnet field, and my new
powerfull magnet all was set up to be correct but ... negative again.

All experiments (more than 30 experiments) lead to that conclusion:
1) With a resistive load, current and voltage are sinusoidal wave in
phase. Power output is a quarter power input on each secondary,
which gives output power half of the input. Power calculations are
easywith such phased waves.

Pout = Umax²/(2*R) = Ueff²/R
or
Pout= Umax*Imax*cos(phase)/2 = Ueff*Ieff*cos(phase) with cos(phase)=1
These formulaes give the same output power each times (with little
decimal difference).

My resistive load is 120kohm(0,5Watt) and 12ohm (10Watt) series
resistors, the second is used to measure current.
chA and chB are probes on oscilloscope:
--chA--R120kOhm--chaB--R12Ohm---Mass--
COP=0.5
(very bad transformer)

Voltages are not too high: 600 to 800 V pic to pic.

2)With a MOV load (I tried with one 420V MOV, 2 420V MOV, 3 420V MOV
and 4 420V MOV in series, to that was the same as varying MOV from
420 to 1680V) all signals are sinusoidal, but there is a phase angle.
If I insert a 120 kohm resistor in series with my MOV (and my 12ohm
resistor used to measure currents), phase angle becomes very little
(which is logical if you draw a phases in a complex plane: a big
resistor is a big real impedance and phase angle comes from the
complex impedance of MOV, whoch is little). But with a 120kohm
resistor in series, measurements are the same than with no MOV and
only resistor.

Phase angle is constant when varying frequency.

When varying frequency from from 17KHz to 50KHz, power output was
reducing, and so power input. There is no current pic as claimed on
JL Naudins website, so no "tuning". The less the frequency is, the
more current and voltages I have.

And there is no tuning as claimed by Naudin " the working frequency
must be tuned so as to get a pure sine wave and the max amplitude at
the output (>1KV peak-to-peak loaded),".

Voltages vary from 800V to 1400V pic to pic. There is a resonance
effect with MOV (MOV have a capacitor value) but the operating
frequencies used does not reach pic resonance.

Currents are much more higher than with a pure resistive load, but
with phase angle, power output is:
Pout= Umax*Imax*cos(phase)/2 = Ueff*Ieff*cos(phase) with
cos(phase)<0.5

and this give Power output varying from 1/10 to 1/4 of power input
(depending of frequency).
Again best COP = 0.5 approximately.

But ther is no power gain.
So, what I gain in current I lose in phase angle.

Naudin says "the voltage and current are in phase as shown in my
scope pictures above,
- a "conditionned" RLoad (100 Kohms, non inductive carbon, 5Watts)
or a MOV (Metal Oxide Varistor) is REQUIRED for getting the output
datas measured above,"

Again measurements are contradictory to Naudin, where output current
and voltage are in phase with his conditioned resistor, but with 9W
neon too. With a neon, I obtain phase angle again.

This is logical, these non linear components give birth to a phase
angle. Naudin never give the schema of his load measurements?. He
gives us oscilloscope pictures, but does not give us what he
measured on his channel of his oscilloscope. This is very important
as to understand what I did to have no phase angle with a neon!

Naudin says "The current has been measured with a 10 ohms ceramic
and non inductive resistor . the same resistor and the same method
of measurement has been used for input and also the output"

So, he measured currents with his 10ohm resistor (I used 12 ohm
resistor). But for the rest? Has he measured both secondary coils
linked together, only one secondary with a neon and his resistor in
series, etc?

I bought batteries to try wether power supply was a problem, but
this changed nothing.


CONCLUSION
All Naudin claims are contradicted with a replication of his
experiment. He is the only one I know claiming a MEG success with
published measurements; but measurements are not reproductible with
the same device than his. His control board does not fit his input
signals. His loads do not fit his output signals; nothong is right.
I waited for one year to have an answer from him, but i had nothing.

Do you know another successfull overunity MEG construction? The only
thing I can read here is questions, but I don't read any success.
Maybe I have made a mistake?

When reading Bearden's Patent, we can see that no specific load is
needed (conditionned Rload or MOV), and patent says that secondary
output coils can be wounded with less turns that input primary
coils, so to have a very little voltage, and this leads not to a COP
loss for the MEG, so claims of voltage that must build up have no
foundations.

Bearden does not reveal his scheme for his MEG, so we can not say
wether it works or not, but for Naudin it is possible. Why does not
he answer direct simple questions? Maybe because this is a big LIE.
I don't say that MEG is a lie, but Naudin replications may be. If
not, why doesn't he give us clear answers about his measurements? I
cantoo take pictures of phased voltages and currents, with high
current values, and saying you: that's my MEG results!! There is
overunity.
But if I give you an exact way to reproduce my experiment and you
don't find the same thing you can say that I am a lier. But if I
give you only some partial results, not everything... and a special
conditioned Rload, and a magic neon, then I can tell you that you
experiment is not the same than mine, so I am the only one to have
success.

Simple question to make the points? Who, in this list has had a
overunity MEG success in his experiments?


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MEG_builders


TO my knowledge NO ONE has been able to create a working MEG device.

Kofi Annan was well meaning, but he was likely duped.

I'll say it again. If there was anything to these ZPE energy devices,
all the major energy companies would be on this stuff like flies on shit.
If these devices work they truly would revolutionize the entire energy industry.
Imagine a bank of batteries in your house that would supply all the power
you needed for decades on end. Who wouldn't be buying these things?
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Unread postby Novus » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 20:01:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '
')Gawd.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the MAHG device is BULLSHIT.

Casmir 'force' is interesting, but hardly germane as far a creating useful
amounts of energy.

The concept behind the MAHG device is combining individual hydrogen atoms
(atomic hydrogen) into molecular hydrogen (H2) releases more energy
than is lost dissociating H2 back to atomic hydrogen. This contradicts all known
thermodynamic laws. So where does this extra energy come from? Supposedly
those tricky little hydrogen atoms act as 'pumps', pulling energy from the ZPE
vacuum before releasing it when recombining.

Ya. Whatever. Sounds like perpetual motion to me.



MAHG is hardly BS. My explaination of how the MAHG works in theory can found on page threeof this thread.

You seem to disbelieve in MAHG based on your groups attempts to recreate the MEG experiment. Tom Bearden did have some interesting theories but his idea of MEG was flawed because it didn't integrate sacred geometry which both the MAHG and lift project do.

Just because MEG turned out to be a dead end does not mean all the other ZPE projects are doomed. There are lots of people working on this and some seem very promising. Remember Edison failed thousands of times befor he got the light bulb to work.

As for Kofi Annan being duped; seeing the lift projects is what really blew his mind. Seeing something float off the desk will convince just about anyone ZPE is real.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby eric_b » Sun 17 Jul 2005, 21:41:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '
')
MAHG is hardly BS. My explaination of how the MAHG works in theory can found on page threeof this thread.

You seem to disbelieve in MAHG based on your groups attempts to recreate the MEG experiment. Tom Bearden did have some interesting theories but his idea of MEG was flawed because it didn't integrate sacred geometry which both the MAHG and lift project do.

Just because MEG turned out to be a dead end does not mean all the other ZPE projects are doomed. There are lots of people working on this and some seem very promising. Remember Edison failed thousands of times befor he got the light bulb to work.

As for Kofi Annan being duped; seeing the lift projects is what really blew his mind. Seeing something float off the desk will convince just about anyone ZPE is real.


*sigh*

Do you have any sort of background in the sciences? Ever taken Physics or Chemistry
101 at the local uni? If so, you'd realize the 'explanantion' you provided is fantasy.
I wouldn't even dignify it by calling is pseudoscience.

MAHG, as a concept, is pure perpetual motion. Despite trying to gloss it over
by referring to 'zero point' energy to get around this fact.

Quantum mechanical concepts, while strange, have been confirmed, over and over
again by experiement. As far as I'm aware no one has been able to verify
any energy devices based on ZPE. And this is not for lack of trying.

I'd bet money that you'll never see a working MAGH device.

Anyway, I'm done with this topic.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest