by Outcast_Searcher » Thu 10 Nov 2016, 13:26:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I') think humans are intelligent, slightly more intelligent than the great apes.
The confusion is the difference between PERSONAL and SOCIAL intelligence.
Personal intelligence has the possibility of being great.
Social (collective/hive) intelligence is pretty primitive.
Excellent points.
I was going to ask how stupidity could create MRI's, find hundreds of exoplanets, reliably send space probes throughout the solar system that gather a lot of fantastic data for many years, build and maintain a reliable GPS network and the devices that use it, etc.
And I was going to point out that OTOH, wars, riots, slavery, and BAU demonstrate about as much intelligence as a colony of bacteria.
So it's all about CONTEXT. We ascended via the law of club and fang (see Jack London, "The Call of the Wild". That mode doesn't work so well in a large social context.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.