by FlyAgaric » Thu 14 Jul 2005, 17:24:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala', 'L')ady
The rationing schemes by the states or by the gas stations themselves made matters worse.
Not every area of the country had that and those areas
didn't have nearly the shortages or the lines as elsewhere. I never remember either in my area.
For example, some areas had a low gas limit for visit. If before you were
making one visit per 15 gallons of useage, you may have had to make
three visits and so forth, leading to a lot of lines. It also led to tank topping,
which increased the likelihood some station would run out, drivers saw
the out of gas and the lines, which encouraged them to join the queue.
It was a self fullfilling prophesy--gas is really short, so I'll buy more,
making it shorter.
There was also the fact that the domestic production price limit, from
the first oil embargo was still in effect during the second. Domestic
producers weren't overly eager to pump more, and saw it as a political
opportunity to remove the price limit, which happened, but only after
a period of time of gas lines.
A lot of this is to say that the '70s gas crises in the states were mainly psychological, not a legitimate disruption of supply. Make no mistake. There was a supply disruction during the embargo and again when Iran stopped supplying oil in 1979. However, the shortage was more the result of panic buying, unnecessary rationing and poor distribution.
I can't foresee three being any lines unless there is an event that disrupts the consumer psyche: an overthrow out the Saudi royal family by Jihadists or a confrontation with Iran over its nuclear program.
A lot of economics is psychology. It's kinda screwy and abtract when you think about it.
--
M.