Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Vitamin Thread (merged)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Unread postby Doly » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 11:22:19

Being the daughter of a doctor, I grew up used to the concept that common meds would be easily available whenever I needed them. Now, I find that when I get an infection and need antibiotics I need to get the doctor to prescribe them first, which means that if I happen to get sick in a weekend, I have to wait a day or two. If the course of antibiotics isn't enough, I have to persuade the doctor that I do know what a viral infection is, and that I'm perfectly able to distinguish if something had an effect or not, and all I need is a longer course. This isn't always trivial. I'm used the fact that my basic medical knowledge plus the Internet usually provides a better diagnostic than the doctor. After all, the doctor knows fundamentally the information you've given them in a short chat, while I know all the details of the progression of the disease, and I have given the whole thing normally a lot more thought than a few seconds, which is the average time a GP takes to diagnose.

I still have to suffer from time to time the indignity of being prescribed what I know are the wrong meds. The only way out of this is herbal medicine, and I'm quite upset that even this is going to disappear. Luckily, my knowledge of herbal medicine is extensive enough that I can recognize wild herbs when I see them.

But still, you can't beat the effectivity of some modern meds. I wish I could just buy them without having to deal with doctors.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby sklump » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 13:47:15

Y'know, if you had to get a prescription to eat a fast food meal-pellet, ... :evil:
As Canadian as ... possible, under the circumstances
User avatar
sklump
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 14:35:52

Speaking of nutrition for intelligence, my 60 year old mother has been taking high grade coral calcium for the past 2 years. She says that she is thinking more clearly since taking it, and she gets the answers faster when she watches Jeopardy on television. The health effects from this one supplement are impressive.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby MarkR » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 17:18:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'M')odern western medicine is the biggest mass scam in history. The healthcare industry would go bankrupt if they really wanted to cure people. They want you to empty your assets to buy their healthcare for some temporary relief, but not a real cure.


This is a scandalous statement, and is undeniably false. Virtually all treatments are developed with the intention to cure, but cure is a difficult goal.

Modern medicine has brought us several cures for different types of cancer - some only partial, but things are improving all the time.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Coral calcium is a natural treatment and can cure for some forms of cancer.


Natual, yes. However, the rest of your statement is false - indeed, the link you provided says as much! Indeed, if someone does have cancer, taking calcium supplements is a very bad idea - as toxic high levels of calcium in the body are a common symptom of cancer, and responsible for a lot of discomfort and distress.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Calcium deficiency is a big contributor to various degenerative diseases such as hypertension, cancer, diabetes, and alzheimers. Coral calcium is unique because it is ionized, and contains a large amount of magnesium and roughly 73 trace metals. Ionized calcium is much easier for the body to absorb. Cheap calcium supplements mostly just flush right through your urinary tract, not doing you any good. Here's another site with some scientific research links on the subject.


Again. False. Calcium deficiency has no relevance to development of cancer, diabetes or alzheimer's disease. All naturally occurring calcium is ionized, whether it is in the form of chalk, or coral. The indigestion tablets you can by from the chemist are pure calcium carbonate - ionized calcium.

There is really no difference between one type of calcium supplement and another - the only thing that does make a difference is vitamin D content, because vitamin D is essential for absorbing calcium.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')http://www.healthtreasures.com/calcium-reference.html


A lot of quotes from medical literature taken out of context. I was able to find the article from JAMA and it's basically about the possible health benefits of drinking skimmed milk on colon cells.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Now, back to synthetic vitamins. They simply don't contain the enzymes, hormones and other chemicals that you get from whole food supplements. They are simply of lowest possible grade, and not nearly as helpful as natural borne vitamins... if they help at all.


Well, are we talking about vitamins or a balanced diet? Ensuring an adequate intake of vitamins and eating junk not a substitue for a balanced diet. However, if you are talking about vitamin supplements, extracted and purified from natural materials, then there is very little difference between synthetic or natural vitamins. Apart from the availability of improved potency, or improved absorption, preparations of synthetic vitamins.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Now if Codex comes in and starts eliminating these sources of nutritional value or making them prescription, I am going to be very very angry. There may be some scams out there, but Codex is going to destroy almost everything.


Well, to me it looks like coral calcium is a scam - I appreciate that the most egregious claims are not repeated on the website you linked - however, that may be because the FTC has cracked down and prosecuted a number of web site operators because they have claimed possible 'cures for cancer' or 'slows alzheimer's' etc.

Maybe coral calcium is safe, but is it any more effective then conventional calcium supplememtns, or even just drinking milk and getting some sunshine? There's certainly no research to suggest that. There is very good research that shows that simple calcium carbonate supplements are highly effective.

You can buy pharmaceutical grade calcium supplements for about $1 for a month's supply. The web site you listed wanted over $30. Ouch, buying that is a good way to end up poor. If you buy pharmaceutical grade calcium, you don't have to worry about the potentially toxic heavy metal content of coral calcium - there have been recalls and seizures because of toxic levels of lead.

[quote=Doly]Now, I find that when I get an infection and need antibiotics I need to get the doctor to prescribe them first, which means that if I happen to get sick in a weekend, I have to wait a day or two. If the course of antibiotics isn't enough, I have to persuade the doctor that I do know what a viral infection is, and that I'm perfectly able to distinguish if something had an effect or not, and all I need is a longer course.[/quote]

Admittedly, it's inconvenient requiring a prescription for antibiotics - but I believe that this is essential. In countries, where antibiotics are publicly available from any pharmacy (e.g. Spain) there are devestating rates of multi-resistant bacteria which cause severe illness, and are desperately difficult to treat.

Penicillin, has been, and still is the number 1 choice drug for pneumonia - however, Penicillin resistant pneumonia causing bacteria are endemic in Spain - and treating these is a disaster. The mortality rate for pneumonia from one of these bugs is significantly higher than for less resistant organisms.

Indeed, many doctors still overprescribe antibiotics. It's common for GPs to give 7 day courses of antibiotics when this is largely unnecessary. There are few reasons to give longer than 7 days of antibiotics.
MarkR
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: S. Yorkshire, UK
Top

Unread postby eric_b » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 19:08:14

[second posting attempt - earlier post to this thread lost when server was hacked last]

I don't think the supplement ban 'is a good thing'. I'm one of those people that
feels all all drugs should be legal. That would eliminate most of the blackmarket
drug trade and violence (though it may deprive US intelligence agencies of a lucrative
source of funding :lol: )

If someone is stoopid enough to OD on vitamins (or a supplement) I consider
it stupid selection at work.

I consume gram quantities of ascorbates daily (vitamin C) and I will not be happy
if vitamin C only becomes available in tiny 60 mg (US RDA) or lower quantities.

Anyway, I don't think ascorbic acid should be classed as a 'vitamin' and I also
feel the US RDA is much too low.

Time to stock up on bulk powdered ascorbic acid
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 11 Jul 2005, 20:17:01

While calcium carbonate is more ionized than many over the counter calcium supplements, the degree of ionization in coral calcium is second to none. Calcium absorbtion is often not even factored into some research. An average japanese person may consume 500 mg of calcium a day, while an average american may consume 1000 mg, but the american may only absorb 50 mg while the Japanese person absorbs it all.

Nutrition deficiency is the best hypothesis for the onset of cancer and heart disease that I have heard, and I admit there is still some debate on the cause of these diseases. Apparantly, something in our environment is causing people to develop these diseases over time. It looks to be likely caused by at least partly by a lack of nutrition.

When it comes to vitamins and plant based nutrients, it would be impossible to give the body all the nutrition it needs by food alone. I wouldn't be able to eat 15 servings of vegetables a day. That is why whole food supplements are so great. They condense the most important nutrients into capsule form.

The FTC and FDA are working so hard to silence these supplements because they work. If they didn't work, people would give up on them and use the standard health care system anyway. They are working so hard because they would lose billions if people were treated with the right supplements and it worked. The ultimate goal of the health care industry is the same as the goal of any corporation: to increase profits. It has nothing to do with helping people.

I know that there are a large number of doctors and scientists that say natural supplements are no treatment for disease, but guess who signs their paychecks? We have what you would call a conflict of interest. These scientists are compelled to rule in favor of the corporations rather than the plain and simple truth.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby gg3 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:05:31

I'll be the first to suggest that antibiotics be placed on FDA Schedule II, because when they're abused they're a bigger public health risk (endemic MDR bacterial strains) than morphine or cocaine (classic Sched II drugs).

You can't make that arguement for nutritionals, or anything close.

MarkR, I notice you haven't taken me on yet:-). Since you seem to be standing up for regulation, can you find any holes in my arguement....? If so, I'm ready & waiting to reply.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:10:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'I')'ll be the first to suggest that antibiotics be placed on FDA Schedule II, because when they're abused they're a bigger public health risk (endemic MDR bacterial strains) than morphine or cocaine (classic Sched II drugs).



HERE HERE! COCAINE FOR ALL! :-D

Aside from all that, Snopes pretty much dispels the whole idea of banned vitamns
Click
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby RonMN » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:26:26

You can do without vitamin supliments if you eat organic food. Soil that is chemically fertalized only has 3 or 4 nutrients in it, thus the food grown in that soil has the same nutrients.

The body needs many more (and varied) nutrients...this is the speculation of alot of scientists on why America has it's obesity problem. Even though there has been pleanty of food eaten...the body is still screaming for other nutrients, so people eat even more but still don't get what their body needs.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Unread postby SidneyTawl » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 00:34:21

Well when they finally decide that they should regulate a products amount of

SUGAR,

THEN talk to me about protecting the health of the friggin public.

YEA, no one can overtake a friggin vitamin,

BUT GULP.. CHEW.. SPRAY..DRINK. LICK....SUCK...

ALL THE DAMN SUGAR YOU WISH.

MARK R.

WHAT YOUR STAND ON THE GOV AND SUGAR INTAKE.

Oh yea, can't do that. its the staple of every food processor in the US. It s in practically everything and in some things quantites that can't be healthy.

BUT oooo noooo we can't INFINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CONSUMER is their cry then.


Regulation it seems to me is only done when it suits the business needs, saying that this protects the publics health is friggin absurd when compared to t he other chemicals in our food.


Mudhead:
'hey, Porgie, unh uh unh hu, were's your School spirit

Porgie:
under the rumble seat Mudhead, were it always is,

THEY NEVER COME UP INTO THE HILLS.
User avatar
SidneyTawl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby shakespear1 » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 09:29:42

How about those horrible home "air fresheners" that plug into the wall. Make you house smell like lilies of the valley (death). :twisted:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Falconoffury » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 13:01:48

There was something I forgot to mention in my last reply. Some coral calcium are scams, but not all. On the island of Okinawa, the beach sands are basically coral, but the closer to dry land you go, the lower the quality of the coral minerals. The above sea sands are generally of very low quality. They have lost their trace minerals, magnesium and most of their ionization. The corals sands under the ocean, near the coral are of very high quality, retaining most of the ionization and trace minerals. Ionized coral is like living minerals.

There is a lot of momentum against coral calcium these days, but I haven't been sick in 4 years due to sea veg and coral calcium. I recommend any naysayers to try it, or give it to a sick or elderly relative. You just have to give the body what it needs, and the body can handle the rest. We will still die, but I don't think we were all meant to die from clogged arteries or cancer. I think we were supposed to die of plain old... old age.

In effect, I think some laws should be enacted to weed out the true scammers, but there are so many good supplements, and I fear that the Codex standards will destroy that.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Tue 12 Jul 2005, 15:56:23

http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=815922005
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')U laws on sale of vitamins 'valid'
Tuesday, 12th July 2005 9:46am (UK)
Controversial new European laws which could outlaw thousands of vitamin and mineral supplements were upheld by European Court judgesy.

The European Court of Justice rejected British health food industry claims that the proposed Food Supplements Directive, coming into force on August 1, breaches EU rules.

The surprise decision goes against an opinion delivered by the same court's advocate-general in April, advising that the rules should be scrapped because they contravene basic EU principles of "legal protection, legal certainty and sound administration".
So that's it for vitamins in Europe?
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

THE Vitamin Thread (merged)

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 07:39:35

Vitamin C: possible cancer-killing promise
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')tudies during the 1970s first suggested administration of high doses of ascorbate might provide a clinical benefit for treating cancer, but later studies using the same high doses found no benefit.

However, researchers now say the original studies used intravenous and oral ascorbate, while subsequent studies used only oral administration.
link
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health experts?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 14:16:39

Lets say you have 2 people who are roughly the same. Same health, age, job, hobbies etc.
Lets say 1 person goes on a diet that involves 200 calories a day but 100% of all recommended vitamins and minerals. The other person goes on a diet of 2000 calories a day but is getting 25% of recommended vitamins and minerals.
Who will begin to suffer first? Over the long term, who will suffer more?

Does the body need raw calories or vitamins/minerals more to continue in a day to day manner?
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health exper

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 14:31:55

I have no expertise in this, but I have noticed that whenever I take my vitamin supplement (MegaMen from GNC with prostate herbs) that my appetite increases. Plus, my urine turns bright yellow. I remember hearing a professor say that vitamin tablets don't get digested because they are too hard. That's definately not true with the ones I take.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health exper

Unread postby basil_hayden » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 14:45:12

200 calorie/100% vita man suffers first, by lunchtime! And won't make it a month on this diet, no fuel.
2000 calorie/25% vita man is half the average American calorie intake, so I'd guess that's perfectly healthy. Probably make it to 90 barring any specific disease, like osteoporosis or something.
logic tells me Calories have to come first, or there's no energy source to use the V&Ms. We'll see what the MDs say.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA

Re: Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health exper

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 17:50:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'L')ets say you have 2 people who are roughly the same. Same health, age, job, hobbies etc.
Lets say 1 person goes on a diet that involves 200 calories a day but 100% of all recommended vitamins and minerals. The other person goes on a diet of 2000 calories a day but is getting 25% of recommended vitamins and minerals.
Who will begin to suffer first? Over the long term, who will suffer more?

I think it is obvious that the vitamin taker will suffer the most.
Without going into massive detail (although I am tempted because keeping this short will lead to a convoluted answer), I will point out it is the "synergy" of the foods we eat that give them power. A vitamin tablet is generally formulated (hopefully) from specific known elements. Food, on the other hand, still has many elements we cannot fully account for, and are likely quite relevant to our well-being.

Science knows what is in your multi-vitamin. But it is still stuck trying to figure out how those nutrients work together in the human body: In what amount, what form, and through what processes do they give benefit? This is why there are so many conflicting clinical studies. Different doses, taken in different ways (orally, intravenously, etc.), along with different nutrients currently in the participant's systems, often end with very different results.

For example, a tablet of Vitamin C is just ascorbic acid. But science has yet to decipher how that tablet of vitamin c is exactly utilized by the human body. Which amino acids are necessary to activate its beneficial qualities? Which other vitamins, and in what amount, does vitamin c need to enhance the immune system, build collagen, or improve cancer survival? Do Vit c absorbtion rates increase or decrease in the presence of other catalysts? There is a lot science doesn't know.

If you just take vitamins, you are selectively increasing specific nutrients in your system. You are not creating the energy or synergy that the human body most definitely needs unless you are ingesting Whole Foods.

Here is a recent new article on this emerging idea of vitamin synergy: A new study has found that supplements of vitamin C can largely stop the serious depletion of vitamin E that occurs in smokers, demonstrating for the first time in humans a remarkable interaction between these two antioxidants as they work together.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health exper

Unread postby Vexed » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 17:54:06

One last thought: If your ancestors, see 500+ years ago weren't doing it, and you decide to do it, like eating transfat and/or high sugar foods everyday or not exercising everyday, you are likely going against the grain of your very evolution. Were our ancestors taking vitamins? Nope, and contrary to popular belief, once they made it out of childhood, their lifespans were very similiar to modern man, just without the massive incidence of heart disease and cancer.

We are what we eat. And these days what we eat is killing us.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Whats more important, calories or vitamins? Health exper

Unread postby holmes » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 18:21:00

My upper intestines were damaged when I was poisoined by mercury. Minerals and vitamins are the most important of all. They aid in everything.
My body was basically dpeleted of all minerals.
and I was on my death bed and I was dieing and was confused from mercury brain.
something had to be done.
only colloidal minerals are digested and utilized by the body. Non colloidal minerals pass right through.
read up on colloidal minerals. They have hlped heal my UI and all body functions and synapse functions require colloidal minerals.
Eat a raw diet as well.
our soils have been depleted of their minerals so vegtables and fruits do not have them anymore.
This is a big problem with all our health issues today.
minerals and vitamins are the most important of all.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron