by DesuMaiden » Sun 03 Apr 2016, 14:39:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'I') do not think that is right Sea. First of all how will consumers in poor countries even afford this access to electricity. Oil is needed to mine and transport the NG and Coal. Oil that is becoming more expensive and difficult to access. Also, soil erosion continues apace which will signify less land to cultivate crops. Oh and Phosphate is a key resource which may seem steep declines. I do not see how you can get around the problem of diminishing fresh water supplies. Water filtration systems are expensive as are Desalination plants and all run on energy which last time I check costs money. At least you account for AGW which will I think be a huge problem in Subtropical regions by 2040.
Yeah...solar, wind and other renewable energies can provide electricity, but they can't provide electricity at the scale and consistency as fossil fuel and nuclear fission based electricity. What do I mean by scale and consistency? Scale refers to the ability provide a large number of people with electricity. Consistency refers to the ability to provide electricity 24/7.
Unfortunately, solar and wind cannot provide either scale or consistency for electricity generation. Solar and wind are both intermittent energy sources...meaning you can't constantly have your lights on with solar and wind powering the grid.
Besides, the grid ,aka the system providing electricity to a country, needs a constant supply of energy from whatever energy source is being used to generate electricity. What would happen when there is little or no sunshine or wind blowing? Then, you wouldn't have energy to generate electricity. So the grid fails, and people expecting electricity in their homes will end up getting none. Or at the very least, if we relied solely on wind and solar for electricity generation, we can't have a constant and steady supply of electricity...brown outs will become a matter of daily life.
Without sufficient fossil fuels and nuclear fission electricity generation, I believe most countries will have to go back to pre industrial era where electricity was not ubiquitous. Of course, some areas might still be able generate electricity if they rely on hydroelectricity, but even hydroelectricity has its downsides, as hydroelectric dams ruin freshwater ecosystems. So places that rely on hydroelectricity might need to even get rid of their only source of electricity in order to preserve their local fresh water ecosystems by taking down their hydroelectric dams.
I wouldn't be surprised that decades and centuries from now electricity becomes increasingly scarcer and rarer. Then again, we can live without electricity, but we can't live without food, fertile soil (for growing food), and fresh water (for drinking and other essential life giving purposes). We need to preserve the aforementioned three resources (in addition to clean air which is kinda obvious).
Of course, the end of the fossil fuel era, despite the temporary hardships it might bring, will also bring us benefits like more local community, healthier food, more nature to enjoy and etc.
History repeats itself. Just everytime with different characters and players.