by PeakOiler » Fri 01 Jan 2016, 07:58:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'I') think it would be interesting if you would put the EIA, Goldman Sachs, The IEA, OPEC and any other widely published predictions in the chart so we can judge ourselves against the "experts".
Yes it would be interesting, but the problem is most of these agencies don't forecast but an average price estimate for the year. I have asked our forum players to post articles that may give estimates from other entities if they find such articles, but that hasn't happened too often.
In the 2015 po.com Oil Price Challenge, I added a Goldman Sachs estimate (GS) that was given in mid-summer 2014 iirc, (check that thread), but a lot changed by the end of the year and I never saw another GS estimate after that for 2015 prices.
Here's an example: The EIA's estimates in their STEO
https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/report/prices.cfm says:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')TI
futures contracts for March 2016 delivery, traded during the five-day period ending December 3, averaged $44/b, while implied volatility averaged 42%. These levels established the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for the market's expectations of monthly average WTI prices in March 2016 at $30/b and $63/b, respectively. The 95% confidence interval for market expectations widens over time, with lower and upper limits of
$26/b and $90/b for prices in December 2016.
prices which is what our previous games used. In the 2016 Oil Price Challenge, we are going to use
prices. (Apples to oranges?)