I really think this is a stretch:
“I argue that, for some white male participants, the peak oil movement and similar survivalist phenomena provided one means of reinscribing “traditional” (read: 1950s) gender roles and revitalizing white masculinity. ”
Excerpt From: Matthew Schneider-Mayerson. “Peak Oil.” iBooks.
https://itun.es/us/UA-g-.lI think he is trying to tar us with a male chauvinist brush. I recall very little talk about traditional gender roles in any of the forums I have visited. Where does he get off with this? He may be trying to denigrate Peak Oil as a Climate Change guy. We really are the movement that was and he thinks he's in the movement that is. Little does he realize that neither of these movements has really entered the public's consciousness.
He really runs out of steam in this chapter and tells us the plots of every dumb apocalyptic show on TV as well as other books that have come out in recent years. I think he was trying to "prove his thesis", but I have to say that it has failed utterly. I think this is where he stumbled in trying to prove that most of us "peakists" are chauvinist pigs and racists.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.