by Ibon » Wed 30 Sep 2015, 10:07:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I')bon,
We will just redefine what it means to be human. Christians will be human, Islamist/Muslims not. Then it is OK to do hat ever we want to them, or they to us, because THEY are not really human.
Thus we retain the cloak of humanity and dignity.
Isn't that how it has always been done in the past. You know, like in WWII, when my Father was trying to rid the world of my Father-in-Law, and visa versq?
Yes, this will happen and we can speculate where and to what degree. And also question if there are forces that will act as a brake as well. It is not hard to see how the dehumanization can unfold along some religious divides, especially Islam with its regional instabilities which will keep elements of extremism resilient leading to continued justification for increased military presence, all of this sitting in the region with still the largest remaining oil reserves.
China is another wildcard, it all depends on how much the central government will be forced toward global imperialism in order to maintain domestic stability. A huge appetite of new consumers will not scale back willingly without fighting it would seem. Demonizing China would resonate with populations around the world who fear China's juggernaut. Russia as well due to the historical cold war legacy conflict but I am guessing with Russia's shrinking population they will also go more nativist and domestic and only extend their imperialism to a few of their immediate neighbors like they did with Ukraine.
The US is another wildcard. I actually see less appetite for global conflicts as time passes also with a growing strong nativist movement, more inward and protective. The remaining resource base will allow for this unlike China. The US has a volunteer army. On one hand high unemployment will provide a steady stream of volunteer soldiers but there is growing awareness after the fiasco in Iraq and Afghanistan of the futility of these endeavors. And then we have the issue of emerging generations being raised very soft and overly protected by helicopter parents. Society unwilling to send their 17 year olds into conflicts with ambiguous moral justifications.
Europe is old and does not have a big appetite for war. I would say the same for Japan. In both these cases I see also fences going up, hard lines taken toward immigration moving forward.
Latin America will remain a slow growth, but stable region trying to figure out how to manage and exploit the exploiters; China , Europe, Japan and the US with their huge appetites for the regions resources. The endemic corruption in Latin America will continue and this is what global powers will exploit.
I see the ME as center of resource wars and conflicts. I actually don't think we will see a global world war though.
The other side of this equation is the slow dawning of enlightenment that there can be no real winners in times of overshoot. During WWII the planet was still seen as massive, the whole mind set of the Japanese or Germans to expand and overtake territory was still a viable vision. That orientation is not any longer viable as a reason for war and the internet has created a global culture where it is harder to demonize and dehumanize your enemies.
Let's not forget how resource intense war is. You cant win resource wars when your greatest consumption of resources is the very war machine that has to fight this. That is also something that has to dawn on military planners and hawkish political elements. Every country will have to dedicate resources to maintain domestic stability. This creates contradictory forces toward resource wars, a push, pull so to speak.
We often mention that human overshoot has an element of check mate inherit in its solutions. Counter intuitively, overshoot itself helps mold culture toward sustainability against its will. We all have no choice but to tread more frugally on the planet since any resource intense military or BAU strategy is indeed checkmated.
That is where we will learn to lean into the very elements we are trying to solve.
It is a great exercise to see all of the problems as actually the solutions. Climate change for example is the solution to growth. Human eco systems being far more fragile than natural ecosystems to the impacts of climate change and the contraction of growth is what eventually reduces carbon emissions.
That is my one great prediction regarding the future. That the problems will turn out being the solutions. The kernel of this idea was born when I explored this in the Worshiping the Overshoot Predator thread.
The idea that humans through their ingenuity alone will tinker their way out of this mess is flawed. Ingenuity will play a role. Forced humility capitulating to external forces will play a greater role. Many of us were drawn to the concept of peak oil in the first place because we intuitively understood this.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com