by Tanada » Fri 25 Sep 2015, 10:35:19
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'E')dwin good points. That is precisely why cooperation and a less top down approach to administering the collective or group must be emphasized as much as possible. Basically, we can distill the human interactions into negative or positive, inclusive or exclusive. Humans during these coming times will be stressed and emotional. It is imperative that everyone is included as an informed and productive member of the group and that no small group hijack the larger group for their own purposes. Also, as I stated previously force should only be used when absolutely necessary. It is during these turbulent times when people should most submit not to other people but to a set of guidelines to govern behavior. We will have a wide range of possible emotions and reactions to the circumstances to come and only by uniting into peaceful, productive and farsighted communities can we hope to navigate successfully the times ahead.
Please do not take this the wrong way but your plan expressed here is Utopian, not practical. Literally dozens of splinter Utopian idealist groups have come and gone from the stage of history just in the lifespan of the USA let alone the world as a whole. Every one of them has suffered from the same rule, the only people who will join up are those who hold the same core belief whatever that belief is. As their kids grow up many of them diverge from that core belief and take different paths, if the community even lasts that long. The most successful Utopian group I can think of off the top of my head were the Shakers and they were doubly doomed because they forbid reproduction and only recruited members and adopted young children. Oneida, New York was created as a Utopian community, they believed that once everyone else saw how successful they were they would adopt the Oneida way of life. In the end the group adopted a commercial practice making fine quality silverware and integrated back into the standard culture.
Heck look back to the Puritans in Massachusetts, the first few years they were very Utopian share and share alike, mutual aid and defense. It didn't work out too well in the hostile environment they were in, the first few years many starved or were killed in senseless violence.
Onlooker I admire your ideals of everyone working together for the common goal, but every time that has been tried in our country on a purely voluntary basis it has failed. Only those Non-Utopian groups where a firm leader was in place and compliance was required as often as requested have succeeded. We used to call those firm leaders elected politicians but today most of them are neither firm nor much of a leader. They just jump out in front of the parade and go the same direction it was already going.