Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Collectivism vs Freedom

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby Ibon » Fri 24 Jul 2015, 14:38:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')
The same way democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines, it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more people there are the less one individual matters.


I have been marveling recently at a certain irony. At this moment of overpopulation when one individual matters less we have a global population with a very high percentage of narcissists.

Are you talking to me????!!! :badgrin:


No Timo you were not on my mind. I was too busy looking in the mirror when I wrote that... hahaha
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby Pops » Fri 24 Jul 2015, 15:02:38

Timo gets the PO Humorist award.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sat 25 Jul 2015, 01:04:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '(')I am not a church goer, though I support peoples' right to practice religion that doesn't hurt other people) -- but your idea that going to church is collectivism is utter nonsense. Joining a group is NOT collectivism.

Ayn Rand, the opposite of the "dummy" mentality you associate with collectivism talked quite a bit about it.

I'm pretty sure Ayn Rand was a militant atheist.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby ennui2 » Sun 26 Jul 2015, 23:57:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'I')saac Asimov had a different take.....


Moyers: What happens to the idea of the dignity of the human species if population growth continues at its present rate?

Asimov: It will be completely destroyed. I will use what I call my bathroom metaphor. Two people live in an apartment and there are two bathrooms, then both have the freedom of the bathroom. You can go to the bathroom anytime you want, and stay as long as you want, for whatever you need. Everyone believes in the freedom of the bathroom. It should be right there in the Constitution. But if you have 20 people in the apartment and two bathrooms, no matter how much every person believes in the freedom of the bathroom, there is no such thing. You have to set up times for each person, you have to bang at the door, "Aren't you through yet?" and so on.

The same way democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines, it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more people there are the less one individual matters.


That's one of those quotes that should be part of the unofficial doomer bible. Add his entire The Last Question short-story as well. Asimov was a smart guy.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld
Top

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 03 Aug 2015, 05:44:10

Freedom and Collectivism are not mutually exclusive. I think this logic directs itself to what American Dream has been trying to drum into our heads for quite some time. Humans will evolve to understand that they all have common interests and that it is to everyone's benefit to cooperate. Arguments about interference and undue control are understandable but they fail to understand that the higher good of a cooperating collective is worth a certain level of control. After all do we not have rule, controls and laws now. These rules and laws are needed in any context as humans are apt to act in irrational and unpredictable ways. The greater good is the optimal functionality of society as a whole, that can only be accomplished in a collective political system that all members "buy" into. In time such a society will consist of members who freely and voluntarily wish to be part of said society. As for the discussions of overpopulation and work they are all symptoms of the human race and it's societies not having full control and common sense about what trajectories to follow as well as the irrational pursuits and dictates of economic and religious interests.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby Timo » Mon 03 Aug 2015, 10:41:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'F')reedom and Collectivism are not mutually exclusive. I think this logic directs itself to what American Dream has been trying to drum into our heads for quite some time. Humans will evolve to understand that they all have common interests and that it is to everyone's benefit to cooperate. Arguments about interference and undue control are understandable but they fail to understand that the higher good of a cooperating collective is worth a certain level of control. After all do we not have rule, controls and laws now. These rules and laws are needed in any context as humans are apt to act in irrational and unpredictable ways. The greater good is the optimal functionality of society as a whole, that can only be accomplished in a collective political system that all members "buy" into. In time such a society will consist of members who freely and voluntarily wish to be part of said society. As for the discussions of overpopulation and work they are all symptoms of the human race and it's societies not having full control and common sense about what trajectories to follow as well as the irrational pursuits and dictates of economic and religious interests.

You're describing the altruistic, utopian principles that every civilization has used to justify the establishement of its own rules since the beginning of human collective living. Very few collectives were ever established in order to mandate unjust control over others. Those that have did not last very long. So, in a sense, you are absolutely right about the natural tendancy for humans to act in a collective sense v unrelgulated freedoms sense. However, i would argue that the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and even the Declaration of Independence all contain much of what you're referrencing in your post, and "buying into" such a politcal system works, for a while. The problems start when other, unpredicted intangibles enter the system. Absolutely nothing on this planet lasts for more than a nano-second (in geologic time), and it is functionally impossible to predict all possible outcomes from any given actions in order to calculate the consequences of those actions in order to maintain the benign purpose and function of collective society. The tired, old cliche that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely might better be modified to read that time corrupts, and nothing lasts for ever. Everything that humanity desires, in terms of a peaceful, functional, collective society requires perpetual reinvention. Everything is a work in progress, and we will never reach a point in time, in any culture, under any political or economic system, or with any form of technology at our disposal were we will declare that our job in establishing a perpetual, peaceful, prosperous, and functional civilization is finished. Mission accomplished. There are too many variables at play on this planet to ever allow that to happen. The best we can do is to keep trying. Unfortunately, that is also all we can do.

Based on our collective progress toward that goal since the beginning of the industrial revolution, we're losing, and time is rapidly running out.
Timo
 
Top

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 03 Aug 2015, 11:21:45

Great post Timo, I do not have much to add except that your right time is running out. If and when humanity can reestablish some control over its destiny, your words should be heeded. One thing though I am convinced , a cohesive united humanity gives us the ONLY chance to progress forward and evolve.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Collectivism vs Freedom

Unread postby Timo » Mon 03 Aug 2015, 12:53:24

Agreed. That's why I'm not optimistic.
Timo
 

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron