by Timo » Mon 03 Aug 2015, 10:41:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'F')reedom and Collectivism are not mutually exclusive. I think this logic directs itself to what American Dream has been trying to drum into our heads for quite some time. Humans will evolve to understand that they all have common interests and that it is to everyone's benefit to cooperate. Arguments about interference and undue control are understandable but they fail to understand that the higher good of a cooperating collective is worth a certain level of control. After all do we not have rule, controls and laws now. These rules and laws are needed in any context as humans are apt to act in irrational and unpredictable ways. The greater good is the optimal functionality of society as a whole, that can only be accomplished in a collective political system that all members "buy" into. In time such a society will consist of members who freely and voluntarily wish to be part of said society. As for the discussions of overpopulation and work they are all symptoms of the human race and it's societies not having full control and common sense about what trajectories to follow as well as the irrational pursuits and dictates of economic and religious interests.
You're describing the altruistic, utopian principles that every civilization has used to justify the establishement of its own rules since the beginning of human collective living. Very few collectives were ever established in order to mandate unjust control over others. Those that have did not last very long. So, in a sense, you are absolutely right about the natural tendancy for humans to act in a collective sense v unrelgulated freedoms sense. However, i would argue that the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and even the Declaration of Independence all contain much of what you're referrencing in your post, and "buying into" such a politcal system works, for a while. The problems start when other, unpredicted intangibles enter the system. Absolutely nothing on this planet lasts for more than a nano-second (in geologic time), and it is functionally impossible to predict all possible outcomes from any given actions in order to calculate the consequences of those actions in order to maintain the benign purpose and function of collective society. The tired, old cliche that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely might better be modified to read that time corrupts, and nothing lasts for ever. Everything that humanity desires, in terms of a peaceful, functional, collective society requires perpetual reinvention. Everything is a work in progress, and we will never reach a point in time, in any culture, under any political or economic system, or with any form of technology at our disposal were we will declare that our job in establishing a perpetual, peaceful, prosperous, and functional civilization is finished. Mission accomplished. There are too many variables at play on this planet to ever allow that to happen. The best we can do is to keep trying. Unfortunately, that is also all we can do.
Based on our collective progress toward that goal since the beginning of the industrial revolution, we're losing, and time is rapidly running out.