by Lore » Fri 31 Jul 2015, 15:56:19
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') believe there is a big difference between hunting for a trophy head of an animal and killing and eating domesticated livestock raised for food. Such activity serves no useful purpose for human survival.
Is it really that different? If the food animals are raised in miserable conditions that we all KNOW are miserable, but tolerate because it is cheaper? (Which we generally do. Even "free range" chickens raised in an industrial "free range" definition are raised in filthy, miserable conditions indeed, as one example).
It's easy to say "that's bad". It's far harder to accept that as a suasage-eater, we are part of the problem.
And no, I don't like trophy hunting. But acting like that's "all bad" but whatever activity takes place for "survival" (actually, convenience and maximizing consumption in most cases) is good or even OK doesn't cut it.
Sure it cuts it, because that's our design, but that doesn't condone the mistreatment of any life either raised for consumption, or running wild.
Where we deviate is taking heads for sport.