Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Survivor Peak Oil: Outwit, Outplay, Outlast.

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Unread postby KevO » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 05:47:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', ' ')The message is clear, and Bin Laden and everybody else with a grudge knows it: the way to defeat America is to cut off the oil.


You really think Bin Laden exists in the way Bush and co say he does??
I doubt it very much.
_ALL_ you know about Bin Laden was given to you by the same people who brought you.........
Iraq had WMD
Saddam was involved with the WTC bombings.
Iran's new leader was a US hostage taker (yawn)
yadda yadda yadda
Why believe the Bin Laden one? I mean really why?

Why, after it has proved beyond doubt that Bush and his media co have lied to you 100%, do you still believe in the Bin Laden story?
Bin Laden is the psychological hook that even the hardest can't loosen.

You wouldn't know a thing about Bin Laden if the drip drip Fox news et al hadn't fed you his name over years and years. How else would you have heard of him?

Remember the Kuwaiti girl who before GW 1 (thats Gulf War 1) told the wag dogging US people about the babies and the incubators and then the US people said 'go get em George'.
Guess what, there were no babies and incubators and the girl was a member of the Kuwaiti royal family and big friends with GHW. - FACT!

The veils are indeed dropping and peak oil may be spoiling the neo con plan but you won't see with perfect vision until you realise Osama Bin Laden is a scapegoat _if_ he exists at all in the way that Cheyney, Wolfie, Rumsfield and Powell have got you believing


KevO
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 07:50:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is the sour note. The private automobile is the very root of the problem. The main reason we "need" oil is to fuel cars, and we don't actually need cars. Thus the need for oil isn't a real need, just a pseudo-need.


I disagree...

The car is a symptom of the root cause.

And what is this root cause you may ask?

Well it's the reason we are in this pickle... It's why Jevon was right... It's why I know the name of someone like Martha Stewart... It's why there are so many Microsoft Millionaires, and ENRON paupers... It's why we face a real estate bubble...

Ir's why, despite all the advances in efficiency, recycling & conservation, we consume more energy than ever before in history.

So what is this magical root cause... this shadowy "first mover"?

What could possibly be responsible for such a pervasive effect?

What could it be?
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Unread postby Raxozanne » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 08:45:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')
So what is this magical root cause... this shadowy "first mover"?

What could possibly be responsible for such a pervasive effect?

What could it be?


Is it our unsustainable economic system that requires economic growth and ever more consumption to survive? Along with trade, industry and commerce?
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 08:58:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raxozanne', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')
So what is this magical root cause... this shadowy "first mover"?

What could possibly be responsible for such a pervasive effect?

What could it be?


Is it our unsustainable economic system that requires economic growth and ever more consumption to survive? Along with trade, industry and commerce?


:-D
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 09:42:25

Great posts.

I think JD is on to something. To wage a conventional war, the US would need huge amounts of oil. That wasn't a problem during WWII since the US supplied most of the Allied oil and since our oil fields were secure.

This is not the case today in Iraq. I would guess that most of the oil the military is using in that country is coming from Saudi, not Iraq. Can anyone confirm that?

If most of the oil used by the US in the ME is coming from that region, and if, as it seems, the US is planning to use the ME as its new base of military operations (for obvious reasons), then it would be extremely risky for the the US to attempt a conventional war from that base of operations. It would be too easy to disrupt the oil supply at the source.

The US military successes since Viet Nam have all been of short-duration. And, in the case of both Gulf Wars, the supply was secure.

Having said all of this, I do believe the US could become so desperate as to play the military card as a last resort. If one looks at the current energy bill, it simply attempts to preserve the status quo. Noone is going to propose a Plan B while there is oil yet to be pumped because Plan B means a total economic and cultural shift.

When I used to play Risk in college, when one of us realized we were in a hopeless situation, the hopeless one would oftimes mass his armies in one country and "make a run to Irkutsk." The move made no sense other than to give the doomed player a chance to fatally weaken one of more of the players in his path.

Will the US "make a run for Irkutsk?" I think it is a real possibility.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Unread postby oiless » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 11:52:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', ' ')I think it's only a matter of time until the appropriate military people realize that suburbia and the private auto are a grave threat to national security. This may result in real changes, because they will be coming from the top down this time. The "love affair" of the consumer will not be taken into consideration when national security is at stake


I realize that Americans have already given up large portions of their freedom, (Patriot Act) however I suspect the government would have more problems at home than abroad if they were to start taking peoples' "right" to drive away, while at the same time conscripting massive numbers of sons and daughters away to fight and die in resource wars. The spin machine might be able to to spin people to the correct level of fear and patriotism to enable this, but I have my doubts.
Soldiers go to war convinced that they are working for the cause of right, and also knowing that they will come home and be able to have the house in the 'burbs, pretty wife, kids, job, two cars, etc.. Will they fight if it's obvious that they won't come home to that? I don't know.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he U.S. is a paper tiger. Their military power is a bluff, and people are starting to see through it.


Be that as it may, you guys have the most nukes, and the ability to deliver them. Will the powers that be be willing to use them? Neutron bombs wipe out populations while leaving infrastructure intact. Poisons and biological weapons do the same thing for that matter, I don't know how US stocks of these weapons stand, but I'm reasonably sure you have them.
How does this sound:
(please keep in mind that this is pie-in-the-sky speculation, thought up this minute, and has no basis in fact)
What if the anthrax incidents in the US in 2001 were to set the stage for an incident that did not happen, headline reads:
"Terrorist Bio-Weapons Lab Explodes, (insert number) Million Killed in (insert country)".
From time-to-time the US does something trade related (softwood lumber for example) that effects my country. (Canada) At those points the sentiment of the average working man turns to things like "we should turn off the gas pipelines for a while, see how they like that".
Thank god our politicians have more sense than that, because that obviously would not fly, and we have next to nothing for a military.
User avatar
oiless
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Top

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 12:21:37

I recall seeing an interview with John Kenneth Galbraith who was involved with managing government-imposed rationing during WWII. He said that Americans, with one exception, were compliant. That exception was gasoline. He said "the citizens would use any kind of chicanery to get more gas."

My own grandfather squirreled away a hundred gallons of black market gas in his garage. People did the same thing during the 70s.

The last thing an American will give up is his vehicle. Yes, even more important than guns. A helluva lot more Americans own cars than guns.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Unread postby holmes » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 12:33:55

This has been what has been enraging me for some time. still talking about peak this peak that. back and forth. mundane topics. rehashed over and over. Its done. the facts are blatant. colapse is imminent. Peers in Colarado that are in the energy sector who are not doomers at all. they are changing fast tho, say as soon as the price of gasoline hits 5-6 bucks a gallon, US economy done. so Im looking at 2008 now when the excelleration downward increases. So folks better start talking about reality. ASAP. FAST. It reminds me of millions of whiny brats that need good spankings. :-D.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Pops » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 13:08:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', '
')still talking about peak this peak that. back and forth. mundane topics. rehashed over and over. Its done. the facts are blatant.


When I saw the thread title and first post I thought it might indicate a small shift from talk to action...

Naw.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Unread postby holmes » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 13:48:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', '
')still talking about peak this peak that. back and forth. mundane topics. rehashed over and over. Its done. the facts are blatant.


When I saw the thread title and first post I thought it might indicate a small shift from talk to action...

Naw.


I wish more would join us, pops. I got a crew but it seems most are still deabating when. UUGH. its a cascade effect now. They have to learn that things will not SLOW DOWN as we approach. 8O
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 13:52:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', ' ')So folks better start talking about reality. ASAP. FAST. It reminds me of millions of whiny brats that need good spankings. :-D.


Mother Nature and inevitable world events will do the spanking. :twisted:

Just move along with your own plans and let the rest talk. Maybe they can talk the tiger into a pussy cat.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale
Top

Unread postby holmes » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 13:55:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DomusAlbion', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('holmes', ' ')So folks better start talking about reality. ASAP. FAST. It reminds me of millions of whiny brats that need good spankings. :-D.


Mother Nature and inevitable world events will do the spanking. :twisted:

Just move along with your own plans and let the rest talk. Maybe they can talk the tiger into a pussy cat.


LOL. I know this is perverted, but itll be more like fisting. :shock:
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Pops » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 14:21:40

From the "Please Read" announcement originally posted June 16, 2004 in the Planning forum:

“If you have made it past the discovery, research and discussion phase and are looking for ways to cope with Peak Oil on a personal as well as global basis, hopefully this forum will help.”
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 15:02:10

I've spent alot of time considering what I might do to plan for PO. Other than being debt-free and living a simpler life, I can't see that there is a whole lot more an individual can do.

Seems to me that the biggest problem we will face PO is interaction with the 99% who don't buy into the PO theory and want business to continue as usual. People in desperate straits are dangerous and I am in an area where the population density is pretty high.

I suppose one could form a group of like-minded folks and head for a remote area (like Surinam) to build an Amish-like community. But, as I approach geezerhood, that isn't very appealing.

My feeble hope is that as we continue to spread the word about PO, that a critical mass will form and a viable, palatable Plan B will be developed. Individual action and even small group action I see as not much better than not preparing.

Holmes, Pops I know a bit about your plans from your posts. But I am interested in how you are planning to survive being overrun by your fellow human beings.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Unread postby NEOPO » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 15:05:30

Great post's one and all.

I had irkutsk in with my trade-in for 40 new armies - came back to control all 7 points of russia, then penetrated the unimpenetrable australian annex which led to a troop build up and an easy time with afro-euro and then the whole board!!! :o

Could this be what the U.S or China or even Russia is thinking? :shock:
Are we hoping for a last second "turn-in"?
or
Collecting cards while we still can?

Ok enough of the risk analogies 8)

Lastly and most importantly I wish to now proclaim myself as the king of PO.
What took some great minds weeks/months/years/never to deal with I had dealt with in 4 days.
Thats correct my loyal subjects, 4 hard days and I had came to the same conclusions and began to plan for "our" survival before hitting the ground.
Now bow before me!!!! :lol:

I must acknowledge all the support from people like the moderators here, matt simmons, matt savinar, colin cambell, rep bartlett et all for bringing their bit of credibility to the scene.

I would like to thank Tim leary for the acid, Dennis leary for the laughs and Charles manson for the avatar :-D

I would like to thank god for not existing and the academy for not insisting that I wear clothes to this ceremony...........

"wake up neo"
"The matrix has you"
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Unread postby jeffvail » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 15:11:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')espite the potential to establish independence through alternative economic and cultural structures, we can only achieve true independence in a society that conquers the problem of physical power. A group free from economic or cultural control by an outside agent can still suffer control through force.[13] Remnant hunter-gatherer tribes in the Amazon illustrate the limitations of self-sufficiency. They do not exhibit dependency on the outside world for anything, yet logging companies and ranchers with access to greater physical force (in the form of the State) have repeatedly forced them off their land.


Excerpt from Chapter 9 of "A Theory of Power"

http://www.jeffvail.net/2004/10/theory-of-power-chapter-9.html

where I present my proposed solution for how to survive being overrun by other humans. It isn't a perfect solution, to be sure, but I think that the question raised by RetiredGuy is a critical one that we must be asking...
User avatar
jeffvail
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed 15 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby jimmydean » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 15:17:19

After all my reading and following of the forums here for the past couple of months I find myself slightly more optimistic than most of the posters here.

I do believe in peak oil however it is still too early to try and predict it's time or the size of it's impact. It could happen in 20 or 30 or 50 years or in 2 to 5 years if we continue at our current increasing rates of consumption. Where my optimism lies is in individual conservation of energy coupled with improved efficiencies of technology that uses oil.

Short term higher oil prices are a good thing as it increases awareness of the issue which should spur more conservation as well as the development of other energy producing technologies.

Unless something catastrophic happens to disrupt supply I think as we approach peak oil it's impact may be more like a long drawn out recession economically rather than economic disaster and nuclear war ;)
User avatar
jimmydean
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Pops » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 15:51:22

Retiredguy, there are numerous threads regarding city vs country and surviving the ‘masses’ on the planning forum, forgive me if I don’t look ‘em up. The gist of my view on MZBs is this:

1. The “starving hordes” probably can’t make it this far
2. If they do, they have lots of fairly “independent” people to go through first
3. If they make it past those folks they will likely be hungry so we can trade or fight.
4. I don’t survive and they then have my place - but of course they will starve in the end since they have no idea what to do after the eating is done – they then are the winners.

I can deal with second place in that circumstance as I will have done what I could do. My only option would have been to become one of the starving horde and that seems like poor odds.

But having said all that, firefights with starving hordes of blistered footed suburbanites is really pretty far down on my to-do list. Actually the whole scenario is, IMHO, another example of “there is noting anyone can do so lets do nothing” or worse “I don’t want anything to change so lets fantasize about Mad Max and futility”.

No offense intended.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Unread postby oowolf » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 16:02:44

So it's Tainter's Runaway Train--only the train is a mag-lev supertrain crossing a house-of-cards economic trestle spanning the Olduvai Gorge. Soon the trestle will vaporize.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Unread postby retiredguy » Fri 01 Jul 2005, 16:59:17

Hi Pops,

Thanks for the reply. No offense was taken. The people to whom I'm closest don't share my interest in moving to a rural area, so I'm going to ride it where I'm at. I live in town and am a short walk from the RR. My hope is that this town will become a distribution center when vehicle transport is crippled by high gas prices.

Plus, given my age, I may be dead or at least old enough not to care about living anymore before things get really bad.

If I were young, I believe I would try to assemble a group of people who had a diverse set of skills, pool resources and head for some Third World country that had few resources the modern world cares about. Maybe a place like Surinam.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 192 guests