Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 00:38:44

Funny I reckon it's the case around the world that the areas looked at by mundane suburbanites as extreme hotbeds of racism are in fact comparatively socially illustrious.

Sent from my HUAWEI Y320-U151 using Tapatalk
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 01:01:35

Here's an idea: what people could do, in states like Virginia where they have so much history and it means something to them, is just use what was the official national flag of the confederacy.

I saw this in an article, maybe something like this is wouldn't have negative connotations:

Image

I just really dislike that all this has happened, the truth is that the South moved forward A LONG TIME AGO. Example: there's a Thomas Jefferson society, of his descendants. And they include the descendants of Sally Hemmings. They all get along, they have family reunions, nobody is a racist. Everybody is modern, but still honoring the past and understanding context.

There are thousands of examples like that -- so I am just bewildered how overnight the whole history and confederacy is just banned, just like that, with a tweet from a few ceos.

New York Times, on the "Robert E. Lee problem." I wasn't aware Robert E. Lee was a problem, it's 2015.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Robert E. Lee Problem

The case for Lee begins with his personal character. It is almost impossible to imagine a finer and more considerate gentleman.

As a general and public figure, he was a man of impeccable honesty, integrity and kindness. As a soldier, he displayed courage from the beginning of his career straight through to the end. Despite his blunders at Gettysburg and elsewhere he was by many accounts the most effective general in the Civil War and maybe in American history.


One biographer, Michael Korda, writes, “His generosity of spirit, undiminished by ideological or political differences, and even by the divisive, bloody Civil War, shines through in every letter he writes, and in every conversation of his that was reported or remembered.”

...

The case against Lee begins with the fact that he betrayed his oath to serve the United States. He didn’t need to do it. The late historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor demonstrated that 40 percent of Virginia officers decided to remain with the Union forces, including members of Lee’s family.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/opinion/david-brooks-the-robert-e-lee-problem.html?_r=1


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')lame Jefferson for the Confederate Flag
The Confederate flag debate has lately included the problematical Robert E. Lee. But Lee is not our real problem regarding slavery’s legacy. Thomas Jefferson is.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/28/blame-jefferson-for-the-confederate-flag.html
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 01:57:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'F')unny I reckon it's the case around the world that the areas looked at by mundane suburbanites as extreme hotbeds of racism are in fact comparatively socially illustrious.


edit: rephrase, I'm off onto rants and lectures on this.

Yes, urban / surburban people should just be more understanding of country folks, and then the latter does move forward and change over time, but it's not smart to make it a culture war fight.

The culture war stuff is just division, wedge issues, distracting from policy issues that matter to everyone, ultimately. And that's what MLK was talking about too, at the end, economic issues.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Cog » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 07:25:37

Sixstrings said:

Yes, urban / surburban people should just be more understanding of country folks, and then the latter does move forward and change over time, but it's not smart to make it a culture war fight.

Here again we see the utter disdain of people who live in the country instead of the big city. You might as well just call us ignorant, inbred, red-necks. Since your contempt for us is apparent. People live in the country to escape the hell-holes of corruption, violence by hood goblins, and the ever present government. You love such things but a normal person does not. Your condescending attitude says it all really.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 07:41:02

6 wouldn't last a week in any country town I have lived in Cog, rambling smart parsed bullshitters don't. Next least popular human to 'hood goblin' & closely followed by politicians then banksters.

Sent from my HUAWEI Y320-U151 using Tapatalk
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 11:02:00

edit, rephrase..

SG is correct. I write too much. Let's drop it. I've said my peace -- NOT racism -- but otherwise I do not want to be in a culture war debate, I just don't.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Mon 29 Jun 2015, 12:31:23, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 29 Jun 2015, 11:39:08

Ever met someone who just plain talks too much? Next time you are near a mirror, pop over & say hi.

Sent from my HUAWEI Y320-U151 using Tapatalk
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 13:25:50

Without getting into any culture war arguments, new poll out, Americans evenly divided 42% to 42%:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://i58.tinypic.com/316rg90.png[/img]
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/06/30/usa-today-suffolk-poll-confederate-flag-gun-control/29500975/


African American woman, says she's a flagger, says she got into it after joining the tea party and that she believes in limited small government:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')onfederate Battle Flag - Karen Cooper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWRLzKQTzow


This was also in the news, there's a town in Brazil that has descendants of confederates that fled there after the war:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he South Has Risen Again... in Brazil — Meet the "Confederados"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D93o3kItF-E
Last edited by Sixstrings on Wed 01 Jul 2015, 14:16:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby SeaGypsy » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 14:12:33

Uncle, or Aunty Tom & US general awareness surveys. Good sources there hey?

Sent from my HUAWEI Y320-U151 using Tapatalk
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 14:20:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'U')ncle, or Aunty Tom & US general awareness surveys. Good sources there hey?


There's nothing wrong with black folks being in the tea party, or being Republican. And they are fully welcomed in. We actually are a race transcendent society now, or at least more than it's ever been before. Republican Party has more black folks in it, than it has in the past. It's the honest truth, it may not be millions but there are black folks that have "tea party" / Republican views.

I have a black female friend of a friend who voted McCain and Romney, while I voted Obama twice.

All people are people and have rights, and are not "uncle tom" because they are conservative.

You have to see the whole picture with this, I wouldn't go to a confederate flag rally, but look, if a black person goes to one and says the rebel flag means something to him or her, and not racism, then you have to respect that person and listen to them.

Here's what's funny, me and the guy with the tattoos are probably both voting Bernie Sanders:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/3d1965a05eefc69bb80d803e1f08573755cbb80e/c=305-0-4694-3300&r=x383&c=540x380/local/-/media/2015/06/30/USATODAY/USATODAY/635712671894594146-AFP-542083488.jpg[/img]
Pro-confederate flag demonstrator William Wells chants "heritage not hate" next to an anti-confederate flag demonstrator outside the South Carolina statehouse in Columbia


But I have to speak up for what's right, give my opinion anyway. There are a small minority of shunned racists that fly that flag, but they also fly the US flag too and that doesn't make the American flag theirs alone either.

I'm sorry guys, I'm just not comfortable with it, things like banning Dukes of Hazard and taking the flag off the car. I watched that when I was a kid. This is Americana. It's like the Alamo and Davy Crockett and Sam Houston, in Texas.

Our history is not perfect, and I know Australian history too and I know that history ain't perfect either.

And neither is British history. That one is a good thousand years of a lot of bad stuff, slavery too. Starting with William the Conqueror, who was a scorched earth really bad dude. Good lord, then all those kings, just one thing after another, in British history.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 15:16:49

I was wondering before, about Stone Mountain in Georgia.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Stone Mountain boycott called over confederate flag

A Georgia state representative is calling for a boycott of Stone Mountain Park because of the flying of confederate flags there. Park officials claim the flags are part of a museum, not a sign of hate, and are protected by Georgia state law. VPC
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2015/07/01/29556371/


Now, I have personally been to this thing. It's a nice park, and popular. They do laser light shows and have 4th of July things and I think they do concerts out there, etc.

So it was a long time ago when I was there, I don't know if they changed the show or not, but back then what they did was have a laser light show. The lasers trace the carved figures and then the horses ride off. Now what I remember, is that they did A REALLY GOOD JOB of presenting this history well, and they included civil rights era and Martin Luther king jr.

This was back in the days of the "New South," the 90s. Everyone really did have full reconciliation and history was kept but presented well, ALL OF IT.

I honestly don't understand why things like this have to come down, now, all over the place. These things were all already resolved, a very long time ago actually, in the 1970s. And then the 90s, the "New South."

The Stone Mountain laser show, unless they've changed it, did a great job with the complicated history with a message of reconciliation and bring people together, at the end.

Image
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 15:40:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2013/02/24/dukes-hazard_c0-26-640-399_s561x327.jpg?b56878540de139af4fa76f8ec58d1ea122b84702[/img]

TV Land drops ‘Dukes of Hazzard’ over Confederate flag
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/1/tv-land-drops-dukes-hazzard-over-confederate-flag/


Birmingham to remove 110 year old confederate veterans' monument, will donate it to heritage group that will place it somewhere else:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://media.al.com/news_birmingham_impact/photo/18235970-large.jpg[/img]

Birmingham city officials take steps to remove Confederate monument at Linn Park
http://www.al.com/news/birmingham/index.ssf/2015/07/finding_another_place_birmingh.html


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Taking down Confederate flag only a first step

But that does not change the fact the Confederacy was evil. It was an attempt to dismember the United States of America, motivated by unwillingness to accept any restrictions on the spread of slavery.

But even when all the Confederate flags have come down, we will still have a long way to go. For example, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, is named for the Confederate General Braxton Bragg, and Fort Hood, Texas, is named for another Confederate General, John Bell Hood. Bell and Hood were both educated at West Point. As such, they had sworn allegiance to the United States of America. But when the Civil War came, they violated their oaths, and took up arms against the United States.

Before the Civil War was over, about one-third of a million young men died while fighting to defend the United States of America. Thousands of them were from Michigan, and many of them were killed by forces under the command of Bell and Hood. And yet today, we've name important army bases after these men who tried to tear our country apart. I know of no other nation that names its military installations in this way.
http://www.freep.com/story/opinion/contributors/2015/06/30/confederate-flag-civil-war/29509757/


What the above author doesn't understand, is that the civil war was a family fight, often members of the same family, and there was reconciliation after the war.

Many of the confederate generals and officers and soldiers, were distinguished in the US military, previously. The two literally split in half.

Robert E. Lee was distinguished in the mexican american war, with winfield scott down in mexico.

Lee's father was a hero in the revolutionary war. RE Lee married George Washington's granddaughter. It was a family fight, we've had 150 years of reconciliation. Lee is respected at west point, and in the institution of the US military.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Wed 01 Jul 2015, 16:39:21, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 16:26:53

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Confederate Flag Debate Goes “Off The Deep End”

Republican Presidential hopeful Dr. Ben Carson told supporters at a Spartanburg restaurant “the whole argument about the Confederate flag has sort of gone off the deep end”.

...

One of the supporters greeting Carson, who said he had narrowed his preference to Carson or Donald Trump was wearing a hat with the Confederate battle flag on it. Carson said he wasn’t bothered by it.

“I think his hat is fine,” Carson said, “I can understand why people may not want it on a federal building or federal property but now we’ve turned it into an argument of political correctness.”


Carson also called on lawmakers to consider a constitutional amendment that would “define marriage”.

“I think the Supreme Court way overstepped it’s boundaries. I wish they would read the Constitution because it talks about civil issues and why they should be remanded to the state court system because you can’t have a bunch of unelected people telling the people how they should behave themselves,” Carson said.
http://wspa.com/2015/07/01/ben-carson-confederate-flag-debate-goes-off-the-deep-end/


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Take care in your assumptions about Southerners

My pop flew the Confederate flag, once a year, when I was growing up in Richfield. That’s not the last thing you should know about him, or about the South.

...

Pop told him, “Look, Art, I don’t know if the man is good, bad or indifferent, but I sure as hell am not signing any petition against him.” I never heard any more about the petition. As I recall, we received far fewer Christmas cards that year. Two years later the couple moved out, after being fine neighbors.

Whenever I read or hear about Minnesota smugness toward a Southern state, I always think back to that time. A time when a mixed-race couple had the temerity to move into a lily-white Minnesota suburb in 1967, and a Southern gentleman who happened to fly the Confederate flag once a year befriended and defended them.
http://www.startribune.com/take-care-in-your-assumptions-about-southerners/310782911/
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Wed 01 Jul 2015, 19:07:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]From gay marriage to Confederate flag, how the media are turning intolerant

In a time of rapid social upheaval, too many Americans find themselves marginalized by the media.

What they believed yesterday is no longer acceptable today. The world that they knew is crumbling. And for many of these folks, the mainstream media are on the other side.

And this is a problem, one that strikes at the core of the news business and its claim to fairness.

...

If you are an American who is opposed to gay marriage or respects the Confederate flag, you barely see yourself reflected in the coverage. The message is that you are clueless, out of touch, a lost cause. And in some quarters it’s worse: that you are a bigot, a homophobe and a racist.

...

Some journalists just come out and say it: there aren’t two sides in the gay marriage debate.

Most news organizations have so tilted their coverage in favor of the court’s ruling that you might get the impression that only an extreme few think differently.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/06/30/from-gay-marriage-to-confederate-flag-how-media-are-turning-intolerant/
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Keith_McClary » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 00:46:27

No, GOP, biblical Marriage was not between one man and one woman
By Juan Cole | Jun. 28, 2015
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ick Santorum and Mike Huckabee have formally pledged: “We will not honor any decision by the Supreme Court which will force us to violate a clear biblical understanding of marriage as solely the union of one man and one woman.”
...
fundamentalists are always highly selective, trying to impose parts of the scripture on us but conveniently ignoring the parts even they can’t stomach as modern persons.
1. In Exodus 21:10 it is clearly written of the husband: “If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish the food, clothing, or marital rights of the first wife.” This is the same rule as the Qur’an in Islam, that another wife can only be taken if the two are treated equally.
2. Let’s take Solomon, who maintained 300 concubines or sex slaves. 1 Kings 11:3: “He had seven hundred wives of royal birth and three hundred concubines, and his wives led him astray.” Led him astray! That’s all the Bible minded about this situation? Abducting 300 people and keeping them immured for sex? And the objection is only that they had a lot of diverse religions and interested Solomon in them? (By the way, this is proof that he wasn’t Jewish but just a legendary Canaanite polytheist). I think a settled gay marriage is rather healthier than imprisoning 300 people in your house to have sex with at your whim.
3. Not only does the Bible authorize slavery and human trafficking, but it urges slaves to “submit themselves” to their masters. It should be remembered that masters had sexual rights over their property assuming the slave-woman was not betrothed to another, and so this advice is intended for concubines as well as other slaves. And, the Bible even suggests that slaves quietly accept sadism and cruelty from their masters: 1 Peter 2:18: “Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the cruel.” So a nice gay marriage between two legal equals with no acts of cruelty would be much better than this biblical nightmare.
4. Then there is Abraham, who made a sex slave of his wife’s slave, the Egyptian girl Hagar, and then abandoned her to cruel treatment.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')enesis 16:1-6:
“Now Sarai, Abram’s wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian slave named Hagar; 2 so she said to Abram, “The Lord has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my slave; perhaps I can build a family through her.” Abram agreed to what Sarai said. 3 So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian slave Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. 4 He slept with Hagar, and she conceived. When she knew she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. 5 Then Sarai said to Abram, “You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put my slave in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises me. May the Lord judge between you and me.” 6 “Your slave is in your hands,” Abram said. “Do with her whatever you think best.” Then Sarai mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her.

So let’s get this straight. Abraham isn’t said to have married Hagar. Apparently he and Sarah had separate property, because Hagar remains her slave. So he slept with someone else’s slave and got her pregnant. And then when that caused trouble between his wife and her slave, he washed his hands of his property-lover and let his wife mistreat her. As we know from 1 Peter, Hagar was supposed graciously to put up with this, but she was made of fiercer stuff than that, and you really have to root for her in this rather sick family situation.
5. According Mark 12:19, guys, if your brother kicks the bucket, you have to marry your sister-in-law and knock her up. Since the Bible approved of multiple wives, you have to do this even if you’re already married. If you think in-laws are hard to get along with now, try being married to them.
6. So I don’t think this happens very much, but guys, in biblical marriage you might have to cut your wife’s hand off if she defends you too vigorously. That’s right. Say you’re at a bar and this big bald badass with tats starts smashing your face in. And say your wife likes you and wants to stop the guy from giving you a concussion. Say she reaches down and gets him by the balls. So the Bible would reward her for loyalty and bravery and fast thinking, right?
Nope. Now you have to cut off her hand. I mean have to. You’re not allowed to have a moment of weakness and think about how pretty her fingers are. Off with it, to the wrist
GOP, you think I’m making this up, right?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')euteronomy 25:11-12: “11 If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, 12 you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.”

I’m not sure exactly what kind of weird marriage Deuteronomy is recommending, where certain actions taken by they wife to keep herself from being turned into a widow are punished by her husband by chopping off her hand.
7. The Bible doesn’t even approve of marriage at all! 1 Corinthians 7:8 “To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do.” So contrary to the GOP’s notion that the Bible authorizes only a single kind of marriage, of which it approves, actually it much prefers believers to die out in a single generation. Only the weak and unbiblical get married.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Plantagenet » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 01:48:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '
')
Birmingham to remove 110 year old confederate veterans' monument, will donate it to heritage group that will place it somewhere else


Good news.

This is no different then Ukraine and the rest of the countries in eastern Europe tearing down all the statues of Lenin and Stalin after the Russians and their lackeys were booted out.

It just took a bit longer in the USA because until recently the south was controlled by the Democratic party---the Dems WERE the Confederates, and after the Dems lost the Civil War they ran the south for a century. The Ds in the south were the ones who put up all the statues of their fellow confederates and KKK founders in the city parks and town square and the Ds were the ones who passed laws requiring the confederate flag to flown at the state house and the Ds were the ones who passed all the laws mandating segregation and jim crow.

Now that the Ds are out of power in the south, the confederate and KKK stuff in the south can finally be torn down. :)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Beery1 » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 05:44:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'T')hat sound you're hearing in your head Cog is the circling of black helicopters.

So you claim he's making all this up? ...


That's called a straw man.

What I think Lore is actually saying is that the Cog's post is evidence that he's a conspiracy nut. Not because it's not happening, but because the fact that it's happening is not evidence that there's some government conspiracy to dig up Confederate generals as part of the New World Order.
"I'm gonna have to ask you boys to stop raping our doctor."
Beery1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 690
Joined: Tue 17 Jan 2012, 21:31:15
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 09:08:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'G')ood news.

This is no different then Ukraine and the rest of the countries in eastern Europe tearing down all the statues of Lenin and Stalin after the Russians and their lackeys were booted out.


Plant -- if the Vietnam War was a bad war, should they tear down the Vietnam Memorial wall in DC too? Do you punish the war dead for the mistakes of political leaders, sending them to war?

Plant, these are memorials to veterans. The story I linked is an obelisk memorial to sailors and soldiers.

USA Today scientific poll shows Americans split evenly, 42%-42%.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Did Republicans jump the gun on the Confederate flag?

Politicians were tripping over themselves to call for the Confederate flag to be taken down in the wake of the Charleston shootings. But a new poll found Americans weren't quite so decisive.

In fact, for once, politicians might actually have gotten out ahead of public opinion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/02/did-republicans-jump-the-gun-on-the-confederate-flag/


CNN poll shows higher percentage:

Image

Note: this really is not about the flag at the capitols, it rolled right from that to taking down monuments to war dead and veterans and erasing the South from all history, including banning civil war video games and movies and tv shows. And then pressure on museums and parks, like Stone Mountain in Georgia. I've already posted I've been to Stone Mountain, unless they changed it all somehow from 20 years ago, back then they did a VERY GOOD JOB of presenting all the history and civil rights and then tying it in to bringing all people together and American patriotism at the end of it.

The Pentagon says it will not change military base names:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')entagon: Confederate base names won't be changed

Army Brig. Gen. Malcolm B. Frost, chief of public affairs, said the naming of these bases "occurred in the spirit of reconciliation, not division."

He also said that "Every Army installation is named for a soldier who holds a place in our military history. Accordingly, these historic names represent individuals, not causes or ideologies."
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/24/politics/confederate-army-bases-names/index.html


I agree with General Frost, and I already said the same thing myself -- there was reconciliation and forgiveness after the civil war.

Plant -- we usually agree on most things, and I know you're someone it's okay to disagree with, and you never get mean. So we do disagree sometimes, and that's okay.

This Southern history stuff is just my state's history, that's all. It's like the conquistadors and Hernan Cortes and DeSoto and Ponce de Leon. We have a lot of Spanish Empire history too, that doesn't make me Spanish or think indians should be subjugated, but it's still our history.

I learned all about the civil war, back in grade school. The full story, about slavery as well, and the abolition movement and the little civil wars in the western states like Kansas and Indiana, etc. We were taught all of that. The full history, and then our state's history and what its unique history was, in the confederacy years.

I watched Dukes of Hazard, when I was a little kid. There was nothing racist about that tv show.

I was in the Scouts when I was a kid, and have good memories of seeing all these historical sites, in my state and on trips around the country.

We have a lot of tourists in my state, and they appreciate the history we have -- from Spanish Empire to Cuban immigrant to African American to confederate era.

This is our history. And my state has its own history, and every state in the South has its own history.

Tourism is important in places like New Orleans as well, and its confederate period is a part of that mix along with pirates and creole and Acadians that came from Quebec and all of that.

It's our American history, the monuments shouldn't be torn down and museums abandoned and defunded.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Thu 02 Jul 2015, 11:06:52, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 09:43:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Beery1', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'T')hat sound you're hearing in your head Cog is the circling of black helicopters.

So you claim he's making all this up? ...


That's called a straw man.

What I think Lore is actually saying is that the Cog's post is evidence that he's a conspiracy nut. Not because it's not happening, but because the fact that it's happening is not evidence that there's some government conspiracy to dig up Confederate generals as part of the New World Order.


Cog isn't wrong on this one, the PC culture went too far when it gets down to pulling up 120 year old veterans' monuments and banning the sale of flags and civil war strategy games (that was on the apple app store, but how politically correct works is that it can just spread like wildfire among the CEOs and board rooms, then next thing you know you can't buy a Gettysburg strategy game on Steam either).

There is also serious historical (as in real scholarly historians), and civil liberties concerns here. Corporate America is not our elected government, corporations are not the only institutions in our society, and a far left corporate media that gets on bandwagons is not our elected government either, and neither is the Pope in Rome our government.

The big issue that spooked me was really the mass banning of confederate flag sales, I've never seen anything like that happen in America before, and then it jumped so fast to everyone asking if they ought to pull up their local monuments and museums, and then you see CNN crews going to even little mom and pop confederate belt buckle shops acting like it's a horrible thing.

So do you all see how that happens, with the PC stuff and the moving goalposts? One can say Amazon is a private company, but then whoah wait a sec here is ebay banning it too -- yet ebay is a primary exchange market for antiques and collectibles.

And THEN the goalpost moves further, and CNN is all over some little confederate belt buckle mom and pop shop on Main Street.

[edited for brevity, trying not to lecture.]
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Let's dig up dead people because they are racist

Postby Sixstrings » Thu 02 Jul 2015, 11:20:21

Just to note, that same CNN poll also shows 55% of Americans support taking down the flag at government places. The same people, in the poll, say the flag is not racist though but about Southern history -- by a margin of 57% - 33%.

So that's my opinion as well, as I already stated in this thread, I'm just right square in line with the majority of people.

The way I see it is that it really is not a racist flag (the flag has been misused by some, yes, but it's not just their flag, white supremacists fly the US flag too), but this is just something that can be done out of respect for people that are offended by it, and especially in light of the tragedy in Charleston.

But when it gets down to banning the sale of flags, pulling up war dead monuments, and banning gettysburg strategy video games -- uh, no.

This is a massive civil liberties concern anyway, we just do not do this America, we do not ban flags or political books or history books or music or religious books.

TV Land shouldn't have pulled Dukes of Hazard, unless the ratings are low -- that show is not a racist show, for goodness sake.

This PC ban hammer stuff would never end if we start this up, and it's not even how we do things in America with our first amendment, we don't ban the sale of flags. What would be next, banning the old Archie Bunker tv show? Banning Ken Burns' civil war documentary series, and all the civil war movies there's ever been, and all the books? Ebay banned confederate flag sales, that means antique flags and antiques showing the flag cannot be traded anymore.

But anyhow, it'll work out okay, with my opinion I'm actually spot on with the majority of people.

The same poll shows large majorities oppose redesigning state flags (I wouldn't mind about that, though in my state we don't know for sure if its origin is Spanish, British, or confederate. :lol: ).

The poll also shows that LARGE majorities are opposed to renaming streets or removing monuments (only 33% of black folks are for renaming streets):

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]But most oppose other efforts, including redesigning state flags that feature Confederate emblems or symbols to remove references to the Confederacy (57% oppose that), renaming streets and highways named after Confederate leaders (68% oppose that) and removing tributes to those who fought for the Confederacy from public places (71% oppose that).


That poll number on taking down monuments to veterans is very large, 71% are against that.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Thu 02 Jul 2015, 11:44:24, edited 7 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests