by careinke » Tue 05 May 2015, 12:17:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', '.')
I've looked at Cid test , I'm not very impressed , the questions are inducing answers
that's quite value loaded , a bit like ....would stopping beating your wife be a good thing ?
corporation are ( nominally ) an enterprise to make money by legal means ,
they have absolutely no social concern as such ,beside staying within the laws , neither should they !
as for "an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth" it's from the Assyrian Amurabi code of law recycled in the bible
which specifically require proportionality in retributive justice , as fair a concept as was coined in the last 4000 years .
left to the locals , it would be the more traditional " for one eye , both eyes , for one tooth , the whole jaw "
Having written and approved tests as part of my work for over 35 years, I have to agree with you. This test would not pass muster. For example, when you make an Osgood Semantic Differential Test you should always have a neutral option (I like to call it the "it depends" option.
Also I agree that the questions are misleading, and a lot of the questions could have the same answer, derived for vastly different reasons.
The worlds smallest political test does a better job and tests the same two areas. Notice it has a "maybe" option.
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.phpStill, Cids test does cover more topics.
P.S. I also vote for another thread for this. It's an interesting topic.