by steam_cannon » Mon 20 Apr 2015, 22:08:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kunstler', '&')quot;I'm not gay and don't know anyone who is, but I'm pretty sure it (being gay) doesn't have anything to do with peak oil, plastic Christmas trees or consumerism."
It's complicated but being gay probably does have a lot to do with consumerism. This is going to take a lot of words and a long list of scientific studies to explain, but oh well, I'm going to explain this and scientific referenced are below...

So I'm going to jump the shark on this and pose this as a question,
can being gay have anything to do with plastics and consumer products? Well first ask the question can being gay be caused by exposure to hormone altering chemicals to fetuses, the answer is yes. Can the spectrum of being gay be enhanced by hormone exposure? Based on some studies, probably yes. If the answer to those questions is yes and it probably is, well then let's explore these question further. First are synthetic hormones rampant in an industrial society? The answer to that is certainly yes. BPA for example. What is BPA, BPA is that "lovely" estrogen mimicking molecule in water bottles and cheap plastics. However the #1 source of BPA isn't water bottles, eating canned food or drinking from styrofoam cups. Those are all big culprits, but factors of ten off from what you are exposed to by simply handling receipts at the checkout line. That chalky feeling thermal paper you handle at the checkout line is literally coated in BPA and every time you handle a receipt your absorbing BPA though your skin. Summing up, synthetic hormone exposure is very common in our modern industrial society. And some people will be more sensitive to these estrogen mimicking molecules, probably more so if they had prenatal exposure affecting brain development. So I think it's ironically plausible that consumerism could increase the likelihood of feelings in the homosexual spectrum. But not just for men...
Going further, modern women in industrial societies are also exposed to estrogen mimicking molecules like BPA and in addition to that often use hormonal birth control. I'm very pro birth control, but from what I've read hormonal birth control has a very serious problem. Several studies (including the larger more recent studies that tried to disprove the original study) showed that hormonal birth control changes the mating preference of women in some interesting ways that mimic mate preference changes present during a pregnancy. The studies indicated women were less attracted to masculine features and prefer the scent of people with immune systems similar to their family instead of different immune systems. I suspect BPA exposure would have similar effects as it mimics estrogen. The social implications of that are not part of those studies though I do include an article below that briefly and delicately discusses social implications. But I'm not going to be delicate. Based on what I've read and my own opinion, I would guess hormone exposure to BPA or synthetic birth control would probably cause women to be attracted to feminized men (emo culture?) and others with more feminine features including having more interest in other females, shifting their interest spectrum. Further hormonal birth control comes with health risks so women don't usually spend their whole life on it. So I would expect that when women go on or off birth control or their BPA exposure levels shift, that their gut feeling for mating preference would also shift potentially causing many broken relationships as that "natural chemistry" is interrupted or no longer there.
My own opinion, on a society level the effects from estrogen and estrogen mimicking chemicals would play out with a larger portion of the population shifted into the gay/lesbian spectrum as well as very high rates of broken long term relationships. And I'm not saying being gay/lesbian/whatever is wrong, I'm just saying the chemicals people are commonly exposed to in our current environment unfortunately may be shaping sexual culture, just as
tetraethyl lead probably boosted criminal culture in the US until that was removed.
References:BPA May Lower Men's Testosterone, Study Finds (Huffington Post 2013)
"... Phthalates are chemicals used to soften plastics..." "...Because testosterone produces the masculine brain, researchers are concerned that
fetal exposure to anti-androgens such as phthalates ... has the potential to alter masculine brain development, said lead author Shanna H. Swan, Ph.D., professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, director of the URMC Center for Reproductive Epidemiology, and an expert in phthalates."
bisphenol A came into use as a synthetic estrogen in the 1930s (Scientific American 2008)
Cash Register Receipts May Be A Source Of BPA, Study Suggests (Forbes 2014)
Receipts May Expose Us to High Levels of BPA (Discover Magazine 2014)
Researchers advise pregnant women to limit exposure to receipts and plastic (Canada.com 2015)
“What we show is that BPA affects the timing of when neurons are born, and that presumably alters circuitry in the brain, so you get this slightly different wiring,”
Does the Pill Shape Your Mate Choice and Satisfaction? (Psychology Today 2013)
"if hormone levels influence mate choice, and hormonal contraception changes these levels,
what happens when a woman enters a relationship and then changes her use of hormonal contraception? (or bpa exposure?)... So the answer is yes: if you created your mate preference at one hormone level, found a mate, and then switched your hormone level, you may also have switched your mate preference and so feel more relationship jealousy than a woman who was on or off the pill the whole time."
The Pill May Alter Sex Partner Preferences (Live Science 2009)
HOMOSEXUAL STUDY CITES HORMONE LINK (nytimes.com 1984)
"However, in the homosexual men studied, an intermediate response pattern was observed. Following an initial decline in LH, there was a rise to a level about 35 percent higher than baseline. The 35 percent increase occurred in 9 of the 14 exclusively homosexual men studied, but in none of the 17 exclusively heterosexual men given the same treatment."
What's interesting about that last study and similar studies are that they suggest that prenatal exposure is the main factor, but continued reaction to hormone exposure in adult life could also play out in a spectrum of responses, so I would suspect that continued exposure later in life may to chemicals like BPA could have an enhancing effect and cutting off exposure might have a limiting effect. So going back to the article, is it plausible that a person might have less homosexual inclinations due to a reduction in exposure to synthetic hormones? Sure, I find that plausible.
So does being gay have anything to do with consumerism, well if it's a consumer society with Plastics (Phthalates and BPA) and or other synthetic hormones, then the answer is yes.Not that anyone else is going to read though those articles and I'm probably going to get called a homo hater by someone for even talking about these chemical exposure problems. But
this is an oil discussion forum and I think our
oil based plastics could very well be influencing society and are definitely proven to be a many faceted danger such as to growing fetuses.
"The multiplication force of technology on cognitive differences is massive." -Jordan Peterson