by Loki » Sun 19 Apr 2015, 15:46:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he main character, once in the publishing business in the Big City, reflects on his prior homosexuality (back when there was oil) and wonders if he was really gay at all or had he merely played out a role that the decadent, consumerist civilization had set for him...
That is as far as I got. LOL. I'm not gay and don't know anyone who is, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't have anything to do with peak oil, plastic Christmas trees or consumerism.
That's not the main character, he ends up playing a very minor role in the rest of the novel. You would have found that out had you read the book
The reference to homosexuality was in response to the hate mail that Kunstler received from what he calls the "diversity cheerleaders." He didn't have any gay characters in his previous novels, or "people of color," and apparently the feminists didn't like his portrayal of women, either. His point in briefly discussing the character's homosexuality is that, under a total collapse scenario, we won't be able to indulge in divisive nonsense like the modern identity movements.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he feeling in the first few pages is of how serene the world becomes after most of the population dies off from the epidemics and the good people who are left pick up all the stuff left laying around. The first couple dozen pages I found trite and predictable and I hate to say it, but; "plastic".
It's Peaker Heaven, though. A total reset world where the lucky bottleneck survivors get to remake themselves in the low-tech image of their former company-time daydreams — using materials left behind by that same cursed world.
It is Little House except with the constant subtext that all the characters are descendants of the modern Noah. If you hate modern civ and think everyone deserves to go but leave their stuff intact; you'll like it.
Again, there's a lot more to the book, and the previous two novels upon which this book builds, than your rather unfair summation. Did you read the previous ones?
I found the History of the Future to be the weakest of the three, but still entertaining. The first book was the best. I could live without the supernaturalism that he introduces here and there for no apparent reason, and his presentation of the Firefox Republic is cartoonish (as are all his references to southerners), but Kunstler can spin a good yarn and offers some interesting insights. The changes in social relations he discusses are particularly intriguing, the return of a sort of feudalism, for example.