Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Humanism good or bad?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 13:13:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')We carry in our genes the entire history of our adaption to our ecosystem. It is a code an infinite order of magnitude more complex than any machine or computer we have built or could possibly build. That is timeless, magical, and inexplicable.


I whole heartedly agree and this knowledge is currently not even remotely acknowledged in existing religious institutions and not a focus of secular humanism as well.

When you say "our ecosystem" what meaning does this have for the 5 billion urban dwellers in on our planet today?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby AgentR11 » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 13:45:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'Y')ou need an ecological Vatican with a council of ecologists that sends out an update every decade defining what the boundaries are around consumption and breeding so that sin is avoided.
Ecological sinning. Could we ever incorporate this into our religions?


Errr, I believe its already there. Just because it isn't well accepted by the laity, does not imply that it isn't already discussed and elaborated upon in official teaching. Catholicism is kinda funny I think; people stay attached to the Church even when they diverge from its official positions; whereas on the protestant side, they'll fish for a pastor/church combination that is consistent with their opinions. But yeah, the Church has waxed eloquent more than once about sustainability, social justice, ecology, etc. Our dear, current, very blunt Pope put not so fine a point on it... something like, "you don't have to breed like bunnies". I *really* like this Pope, even if its true that if we met, he'd probably spend the entire day scolding me for being such a selfish, irresponsible twit. lol.

We presume too much when we equate the Church's positions about artificial contraception, marriage, and life; with a position that suggests we should all have bunches of kids. Mortal sin is mortal sin; whether that sin is putting on a condom, or harming the environment, stealing, lying about another, etc; other than a classification for trivial bad behavior, being an issue sensitive to popular culture does not cause the sin to be more or less mortal (if there is such a thing). God is forgiving though, he doesn't ask much, just confess, say you're sorry, try to make amends for any harm if you can. We all sin, and sin greatly. The question isn't whether we sin, but whether we can be humble and ask for forgiveness.

We collide on the issue of sex and reproduction, because it is a hot button for popular culture, and is well suited for the hawkers of various brands of soap. I don't think the Church has a responsibility to alter its teaching in order to make selling soap more convenient; and it will easily outlive the philosophies espoused by said marketers.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 13:57:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')We carry in our genes the entire history of our adaption to our ecosystem. It is a code an infinite order of magnitude more complex than any machine or computer we have built or could possibly build. That is timeless, magical, and inexplicable.


I whole heartedly agree and this knowledge is currently not even remotely acknowledged in existing religious institutions and not a focus of secular humanism as well.

When you say "our ecosystem" what meaning does this have for the 5 billion urban dwellers in on our planet today?
They won't die because they are evil.


I appreciate cryptic short answers but I have no clue what you are saying here.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Timo » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 14:04:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'W')e collide on the issue of sex and reproduction, because it is a hot button for popular culture, and is well suited for the hawkers of various brands of soap.


You left out the "fun" part. Reproduction is too often a consequence of having fun.

Reality sucks, doesn't it!?

Wait a minute! I don't have any kids! :shock:
Timo
 
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Outcast_Searcher » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 16:59:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')We carry in our genes the entire history of our adaption to our ecosystem. It is a code an infinite order of magnitude more complex than any machine or computer we have built or could possibly build. That is timeless, magical, and inexplicable.

Um, with respect, great poetic language. Less great in the mathematical or practical realm.

First, I presume you realize an order of magnitude means 10 times or add a zero, right? So you are saying our genes represent 1x10 to the infinity more complexity than anything we could POSSIBLY build? Ever?

Remember -- we are already making tremendous strides in analyzing, replicating, deciphering, and actually USING genetic code in medicine, in food, in animals, and very likely much more to come, real soon now. A specific example of progress is the Human Genome Project, completed (to 99% accuracy and improving), considered "complete" in 2003.

As to timeless, magical, and inexplicable -- sigh -- such words don't belong in practical science we're actually in the middle of, and have made great strides in.

Given the amazing efficiency of, for example, the level of energy required for DNA to work, I'll be the first to agree that what evolution has produced as the building blocks of life on earth is simply AMAZING, and deserving of poetry. And though, last time I checked, the efficiency is still several orders of magnitude better than any working machines men have produced -- that's a FAR different thing than saying it's infinitely more efficient.

However, let's not get carried away. For one thing, we're finally getting smart enough to imitate genetics with our technology, and finding it very helpful in industry. For example, today, Microsoft's algorithms for various Windows related programs feature genetic algorithms. As a gamer, I found it fascinating that the middle game in the strongest Othello programs uses a genetic algorithm, since that provides better results than a man-made algorithm. (Genetic algorithms adapt based on the most successful results of previous generations of programs, mimicking the behavior of biological evolution).

Also, much of the "junk" DNA which represents discarded past DNA segments may have been overwritten or corrupted. Assuming all this information is truly available in any practical form is a stretch.

Please, when we're discussing science, less poetry and more data. Else, we devolve into the kind of "analysis" the hard right uses to "prove" than AGW doesn't exist without having the first clue about actual climate science. (Lots of conviction and political points, zero scientific practicality).

(And no, I'm NOT claiming to be an expert on any of this by any stretch. I've done a little reading as a layman, and was a professional programmer all my career -- but that little bit of scientific awareness led me to feel I should call you out on the poetry-as-science).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 17:31:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')As to timeless, magical, and inexplicable -- sigh -- such words don't belong in practical science we're actually in the middle of, and have made great strides in.



The execution of practical science requires none of these subjective adjectives. I agree.

However, if poetry is not used in the decisions of where we practice science we will surely be doomed in the end.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Timo » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 19:16:08

pstarr, I hesitate to question your neurology lesson, but based on my personal observations of the science of neurology, I think you grossly overestimate the capacity of the average human's brain.

Present company excepted, of course.
Timo
 

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Timo » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 21:08:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'p')starr, I hesitate to question your neurology lesson, but based on my personal observations of the science of neurology, I think you grossly overestimate the capacity of the average human's brain.

Present company excepted, of course.
Didn't you read my post? I was talking about house flies. They are brilliant, even smarter than Elon Musk.

Sorry! My mistake. I thought you were talking about Musk Rats.
Timo
 
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Pops » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 08:38:10

Meanwhile, back in the world, people are less concerned than ever, even as PO.com headlines turn all caps:

Image

Image
http://www.gallup.com/poll/182105/conce ... aign=tiles
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Timo » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 08:54:04

Thanks, Pops. That is a very strong demonstration of why I lack any faith in humanity. The problems we face are always someone else's responsibility to fix. Worry me not! Excuse me. I've got political soap operas to watch, 24/7 across 6 different networks. I'm worried that Republicans might just accept that global warming is real. That thought makes it hard for me to sleep at night.

Then again, that was a poll unique to American's views, no? Maybe in other parts of the world, there is more concern for the health of our planet. I suspect there would have to be more widely shared concerns of such matters in Europe. In Russia, Asia, Africa, South America, likely not so much. Hope I'm wrong.
Timo
 

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 08:57:19

Don't extrapolate in a linear line forward from this poll. The humble pie is also growing larger every day the denial remains strong.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby onlooker » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 20:24:12

"In other words, until now, we have never experienced external consequences that have selected for self regulation."
I have to dissect this statement because it stands out prominently in so much as what has been our history as a species. It has been about surviving and adapting. We have faced all sorts of challenges, at times living in balance with nature at others not so much. Yet, whether in a tribe , alone ,or as part of an empire whatever, we have pushed forward to conquer and to overcome. However, as you guys have noted this time it will be different, our hubris will be utterly revealed as mal-adaptive. We will know humility, all of us. This is the only hope if their is hope. We have a history of conquering and achievement which has fed our ego and ironically led us to this point in history. Now, we will fall precipitously. I also feel that the Earth has now been harmed too much to sustain a large population, our numbers will dwindle and we will almost certainly regress greatly technologically and in our cumulative knowledge. However, perhaps we can salvage enough too quickly re-establish some measure of a civilization. As I stated before, we as humans will be in the midst of a great ecological calamity, I do not see thus how we will not comprehend just how we have harmed Mother Earth. I do believe we have it within us to change our mental outlook in the profoundest of ways. I do not see humans as fatally flawed, we simply leading to this point have been to intelligent for our own good and not wise and circumspect enough. However, what I fear is that Earth will not be very hospitable or giving going forth to life on this planet for a long time to come
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Timo » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 22:58:16

Onlooker, you summed up my POV quite nicely. Thank you!

pstarr, maybe Ibon doesn't see humanity as a plague on the earth, but I do. I don't enjoy saying that, either. There is a lot of good in humanity, but the balance has always seemed to tip the other way. I do agree with you, though, about the evolution of animals to fill the voids due to extinction. Where there's a vacuum, there's an opportunity to be filled. All will not be lost, but this time around, humans will be the primary cause of most of the loss the planet will be forced to endure.

But hey. There's always a bright side. We seem to be on the verge of WWIII that stands a very good chance of bringing down our global population to a more manageable state.

If only humanity's wisdom matched its intelligence...............

If there has ever been a constant in the history of humanity, it has been armed conflict. Humans simply must fight and kill each other. There seems to be no way around that element of our being.
Timo
 

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 23:35:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'I') appreciate cryptic short answers but I have no clue what you are saying here.

You seem to want to describe humans as some sort of infection, a invasive Kudzu Vine-Monkey that will send tendrils of population-destruction out to envelope the planet in a green-metal caul. I don't quite agree. On one hand we might lose certain mega-fauna like tigers, lions and that would be ashame. And on the other hand we might lose 5 billion people to war, starvation, and plague. But I suspect neither humanity nor nature will be destroyed. Just altered.

Evolution can be quite fast and adaptive. Once the population stabilizes (in a less dispersed, less oil/auto-centric----more concentrated enviro) at whatever level we can sustain (1 billion?) with our heretofore not-described/imagined post-apocalyptic neo/pseudo agrarian then nature will return with a vengeance. In my short lifetime I have seen coyotes morph from slinky 40lb Western clones to 60-75 lb. Eastern wolf-replacement that now feed on deer. The same will happen with the small felines we haven't wiped out. So today's African wildcat will morph into tomorrow lion-replacement. Nice. Sweet. Fun!


I pretty much agree with your post. I see Homo sapiens not inherently as Kudzu Ape. We are at the moment invasive and infectious on the planet but that is because we are in overshoot and have had several generations of both exponential population growth and exponential consumption. As we currently stand on the planet we are very much Kudzu Ape.

I mentioned in my above post we are at an inflection point and these past couple generations having conquered limits has been an anomaly. It allowed us to become Kudzu Ape.

Evolution can have punctuated moments of rapid speciation, like after major ecological disruptions so your 2nd paragraph is quite consistent with that and I agree. Our culture can also change quickly and I do have hope that when we fall back to within carrying capacity there will be cultural changes that may allow for self regulation as a result of living through overshoot. We will then cease being Kudzu Ape.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby Ibon » Thu 26 Mar 2015, 23:40:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', ' ') I do believe we have it within us to change our mental outlook in the profoundest of ways. I do not see humans as fatally flawed, we simply leading to this point have been to intelligent for our own good and not wise and circumspect enough. However, what I fear is that Earth will not be very hospitable or giving going forth to life on this planet for a long time to come


I also agree with your post Onlooker. Skeptical but not without hope.

I think all of us would also agree we are moving into times where we as a species will be sorely tested. That is needed actually.

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger..... may apply to our species as a whole in terms of what the coming consequences represent.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Humanism good or bad?

Postby AgentR11 » Fri 27 Mar 2015, 00:44:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', 'I')f only humanity's wisdom matched its intelligence...............


Actually... it kinda does. We are the smartest blob of slime on the planet. Which does not imply that we are even vaguely intelligent; it just tells us that out of all the really, really stupid blobs here, our particular form of blob is slightly less really, really stupid. Basically, "smarter than" != "smart".

If you just take a step back and see the scale, it makes sense. For several hundred million years, Earth has had various forms of growing, breeding, and evolving forms of life, with a very gradual increase in brain function in vertebrates over the last 500 million years or so. In the last 1 of those 500 million, a critter got just barely enough brain function to look across the grasslands and ask, "who am I" and then look at its reflection in a pool of water and think, "doods! SELFIE!"; if we weren't so catastrophically violent and predatory, maybe we'd survive this age and in another 50-100 million years evolve into something that could honestly be considered intelligent.

So no, we aren't wise, and we aren't smart. We're smart enough to be really dangerous, and we're violent enough to use the tiny intellect we have for extremely destructive purposes. If we are fabulously lucky, and escape this kindergarten age of technology (last 10,000 years or so.. out of 500,000,000 years of vertebrae) intelligence may yet grace this world. They'll think of us like we think of chimpanzees, but maybe they'll be more benevolent and forgiving of our inadequacies, than we are of the limits of our remaining primate kin.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron