by Outcast_Searcher » Wed 25 Mar 2015, 16:59:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', ' ')We carry in our genes the entire history of our adaption to our ecosystem. It is a code an infinite order of magnitude more complex than any machine or computer we have built or could possibly build. That is timeless, magical, and inexplicable.
Um, with respect, great poetic language. Less great in the mathematical or practical realm.
First, I presume you realize an order of magnitude means 10 times or add a zero, right? So you are saying our genes represent 1x10 to the infinity more complexity than anything we could POSSIBLY build? Ever?
Remember -- we are already making tremendous strides in analyzing, replicating, deciphering, and actually USING genetic code in medicine, in food, in animals, and very likely much more to come, real soon now. A specific example of progress is the Human Genome Project, completed (to 99% accuracy and improving), considered "complete" in 2003.
As to timeless, magical, and inexplicable -- sigh -- such words don't belong in practical science we're actually in the middle of, and have made great strides in.
Given the amazing efficiency of, for example, the level of energy required for DNA to work, I'll be the first to agree that what evolution has produced as the building blocks of life on earth is simply AMAZING, and deserving of poetry. And though, last time I checked, the efficiency is still several orders of magnitude better than any working machines men have produced -- that's a FAR different thing than saying it's infinitely more efficient.
However, let's not get carried away. For one thing, we're finally getting smart enough to imitate genetics with our technology, and finding it very helpful in industry. For example, today, Microsoft's algorithms for various Windows related programs feature genetic algorithms. As a gamer, I found it fascinating that the middle game in the strongest Othello programs uses a genetic algorithm, since that provides better results than a man-made algorithm. (Genetic algorithms adapt based on the most successful results of previous generations of programs, mimicking the behavior of biological evolution).
Also, much of the "junk" DNA which represents discarded past DNA segments may have been overwritten or corrupted. Assuming all this information is truly available in any practical form is a stretch.
Please, when we're discussing science, less poetry and more data. Else, we devolve into the kind of "analysis" the hard right uses to "prove" than AGW doesn't exist without having the first clue about actual climate science. (Lots of conviction and political points, zero scientific practicality).
(And no, I'm NOT claiming to be an expert on any of this by any stretch. I've done a little reading as a layman, and was a professional programmer all my career -- but that little bit of scientific awareness led me to feel I should call you out on the poetry-as-science).
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.