Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 13 Mar 2015, 23:11:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'W')e Limeys still love you Yanks !!!!!!!!!!!


Well, just to note, I'm not a yankee. A yankee is from New England.

Image

But I get your point and you're a bit of alright Gas. You're like old England, and then there's Withnail and Quinn and all these mixed up folk in Britain now -- communists, socialists, Scottish secessionist socialists, and bankster tories that don't really believe in anything, not like old Thatcher did, I don't know about this Cameron fellow.

Obama admin was against Scottish secession. That Cameron was honestly a tool all through that thing too, I remember, he told Scots "if you don't like me you can just vote against me" -- it was literally Yanukovich's line. So anyhow Obama was against secession, but like always things always blow back on us and no good deed goes unpunished.

So now the re-United Kingdom just goes and joins Team China. A pivot to Asia that's about trade is fine, but not a pivot maneuver on our own flank, from our ally. Forbes magazine calls it an "astonishing departure" from the norms of British diplomacy:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy British Prime Minister Cameron Is Stiffing Obama To Court Beijing

In an astonishing departure from normal British diplomacy, Cameron has broken ranks to back the Chinese initiative. The Obama White House has retaliated by publicly criticizing the Cameron government for its “constant accommodation” of China. The Obama slap-down is well timed because Cameron is facing an exceptionally tough general election in less than two months.


(is there anything that can be done about this? can Obama make entreaties to Labour Party over there? Guys, O is right on this one, Cameron has now crossed Obama AND American conservatives. Republicans won't be for the UK joining up with Team China against the US.)

Forbes says it may be "personal" dislike Cameron has for Obama. Republicans don't like Obama either, but you don't go and join Team China over it:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o why did Cameron do it? Part of it may be personal. Rumors have swirled for years about his uneasy relations with Obama.


And then here is the main reason Forbes gives, that I guessed already -- UK just wants the foreign cash. Our ally has been bought for some bits of silver. :| Was this the only way? Are things that bad in England?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')lthough the United Kingdom’s participation in the new bank has been presented as just another instance of the export of British “financial expertise,” a little noticed underlying fact is that the United Kingdom is close to national bankruptcy. How so? Because it has been running ever larger current account deficits. These recently were running at an astounding 6 percent of GDP, which means they have doubled since 2010 when Cameron took office.

It is a fair bet that without constant infusions of Chinese cash, the British pound would be toast – certainly British finances are in far worse shape than they were even in the mid-1970s when, in an immensely humiliating development for the British establishment, the International Monetary Fund was sent in to London to sort things out. Meanwhile, unlike the United States, the United Kingdom lacks the fallback position that it can borrow abroad in its own currency.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/eamonnfingl ... krupt-u-k/


Hm. So Britain is broke, the same Britain that was flush on Russian money but that wasn't enough either and now they need Chinese money now, so I guess going forward Britain is bought and paid for by China all because they need the money.

This is why I do not like Cameron, he's like a used car salesman, there are no core values with him.

He sold us down the river for Chinese money.

Well.. then there is this, we don't have the money to give you Brits because we've got some troubles ourselves:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') major difference compared to previous times is that the United Kingdom cannot go to the United States with a begging bowl because U.S. external finances are almost as bad as the U.K.’s.


I don't know. I guess you guys have done what you had to. It's okay. We'll be the last city on a hill. As Britain sells out to China, we'll uphold anglo values in the world. The magna carta. John Locke. A thousand years of English common law, rule of law, what's right versus what's wrong.

Meanwhile, Britain is bought and paid for now. Russians on one side, Chinese on the other. :cry: A UK that's bought won't even be able to ever say anything in support of Hong Kong. Brits have just been bought off, now.

Gas -- you're a bit of alright and I don't mean any of this directed at you.

British gov is just broke. Maybe we're broke too, but we're hard-headed like Russians are -- we won't sell out, never, we'll never bow to Beijing or give up our ideals. It's what defines us. There is no "America," without our ideals, while Britain is apparently for sale and we just didn't have the money to keep them as a friend so off they go to the other side. :|

This will be a developing story, guys. It's a major diplomatic rift.

The best the Cameron gov can do at this point will be to PROVE that they're not full of BS and haven't just sold out, that they really can influence the Chinese World Bank. To prove that British credibility was not just bought and paid for, that they are not just a Chinese poodle now, and a token founder of this new Chinese World Bank.

But I have to say, I find that hard to believe. China's not going to change their aims and plans, for the UK. All they did here was buy a patina of British credibility.

Cameron will have to do a lot of work to fix this row with Washington. It's just not good, never should have been a public disagreement like this.

If it doesn't get fixed, I'll predict right now what you will see happen -- Washington would just start backing the EU on everything, any disagreement UK and EU has, US will back the EU. And I don't know what to say other than that, if UK needs the money so badly I guess.

Anyhow -- it's just a shame this has happened, that Cameron could not have even coordinated things so they don't look like a surprise and rift, to at least lessen the damage to US leadership in the Pacific.

I don't know what to say, I love you "limey's" too, but looks like y'all have pulled a France on us. Actually, not even the French have ever done anything like this. (I hate that this is directed at you Gas, I do like you quite a bit and really who cares about world bankers and crap -- except if it ever gets down to our guys having to fight in the Pacific and maybe that was made worse by the actions of Britain.)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 13 Mar 2015, 23:49:39

Good overall article:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ritish Leader Diverges From U.S. on China Policy and Military Spending
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/14/world/europe/british-leader-diverges-from-us-on-china-policy-and-military-spending.html?_r=0


Brits turning away from the old Western world order, could mean the end of that order. This could be the end of the whole darn alliance. USA may actually have to give up in the world, this isn't worth it anymore if we're not on the same page as the Brits.

I will just say that in the short term what Britain has done and plans to do may be bring some hot money in and be good for a while, so okay. But UK will have to turn a blind eye to what China does. That's the price. It's becoming China's poodle, and China is a rising nationalist communist state and is not a democracy.

Anyhow, it's a bold move, I get it, it's good for the UK short run. But it may also end this whole alliance. This isn't worth it to us anymore. It's starting to look like we'd be better actually giving up on nato. Make an American alternative to nato instead, with only more solid US allies.

There's no good reason for the US taxpayer to continue defending Europe, and UK, if they just make it so difficult for us and come at us from the flanks. May be time to give up on it all.

Secure those allies that can be counted on. Like Japan, maybe South Korea, maybe Australia. And East Europe. We may need to cut losses soon and let the world learn its lessons without us around anymore. There is no point in leading a team that does not want to be lead anymore, and we just have to pay for it all too.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby radon1 » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 14:29:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', '
')
Anyway, where is Putin ?
Gas


He is on TV right now, alive and kicking. Possibly, he had a temporary burnout and let himself to relax for a while.

The system of government is so idiotic currently in Russia - Pu has to take care of everything himself, from Crimea to Sakhalin's crooks to cancelled suburban trains in the middle of nowhere in Siberia to the monetary policy and so on and so forth. Nobody else cares, and he brought up this burden upon himself with his foreign policy activism. No surprise if he did have a burnout.
radon1
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Thu 27 Jun 2013, 06:09:44
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 14:36:34

Well... if he's building a new Dynastic rule; that kinda goes with the job. I'm a little disturbed by your assertion that "nobody else cares"; if true that could be *really* bad in the event of an unplanned succession; and 60 yr old males have a habit of occasionally just falling over dead for no particular reason what so ever.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby radon1 » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 14:49:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'W')ell... if he's building a new Dynastic rule; that kinda goes with the job. I'm a little disturbed by your assertion that "nobody else cares"; if true that could be *really* bad in the event of an unplanned succession; and 60 yr old males have a habit of occasionally just falling over dead for no particular reason what so ever.


This is very true. And there are no visible indications of a thoughtful long-term succession planning, and this is really disturbing.

http://sputniknews.com/politics/2015031 ... 01171.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '5') Most Ridiculous Theories About the Whereabouts of Vladimir Putin

5. He's Dead..
4. He Has Cancer, No, He Hurt His Back, No, No, I Know, He Had a Stroke (The Flu Maybe?)..
3. He is Witnessing the Birth of His Love Child..
2. He Was Overthrown in a Coup..
1. He's Binge Watching House of Cards..
Overall, if there is one thing this media furor over Putin's absence from the public has shown, it's that Putin has achieved a celebrity status surpassing that of Kanye West and Kim Kardashian put together. It's up for debate if US President Barack Obama would receive the same amount of media coverage if he decided to stay at Camp David for a week and not make any public appearances, but #PutinChallenge, anyone?
radon1
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Thu 27 Jun 2013, 06:09:44
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 18:41:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'T')he main thing to remember, Six, when you (and others) refer to WHAT "the" Brits (or Ukraneians, Russians, Germans you name 'ems) think / do / propose etc, it's NOT the majority of the said people who think / do / propose etc, just those in Government / power who no doubt have their respective strings pulled by banks / big business etc.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ameron is a smooth talking lying bastard.


Okay, well that's my impression too, exactly.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')is opposite Milliband is a useless, spineless, brainless moron. Clegg is also a liar.


That's my impression as well, of Milliband.

Bottom line on it all is that UK has to make some money, but it's done that by first (a) hot Russian money injections and now they plan (b) selling British credibility to put a shiny patina of acceptability on communist Chinese ideas, in exchange for some cold hard cash.

It's not good, Gas, one cannot sign up to fight Hitler but not imperial Japan too. So now we've got the struggle between blocs, going forward, Russia in Europe and China in the pacific and they'll be an axis. UK can't ask for any help from America in Europe if it's playing ball for the other side in the Pacific.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') suppose it's the same over in the US (I've never understood USA politics). I'll vote UKIP in the forthcoming election and we will see.


UKIP is directly analogous to our "tea party" wing of the Republican Party (conservative).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s to "the UK" joining the Asia bank, well I suppose this is American Dreams department !!. I'm not surprised really, anything for a quick buck / pound / yuan these days. One thing's for sure, as an average UK citizen it will NOT be for my benefit.

I don't know all the details, but it could in fact be an economic boost -- but it's not for the right reasons. It's Judas selling for some bits of silver. There had to have been some other ways forward.

UK just has to remember, is all, that if it wants help defending Cornwall then at minimum it can't ever help China threaten Pearl Harbor. One cannot fight Hitler, but aid Japan, doesn't work that way.

I'll hold back on my own analysis about this until some more comes out about it.

The situation with the China bank is that US allies were staying away from it, but neutral India signed up for the bank. So now UK is the first US ally to join the bank and now that the Brits have done so, more of our allies will follow.

I don't know what the answer is other than we keep getting the shaft somehow, it's always these places our tax dollars go to defending but then they tack it down a middle line to benefit from both sides, or something. I think I've had enough of it, I'm about ready to be an isolationist and just say bring the troops home and let Brits and Europeans spend THEIR OWN money to defend THEMSELVES.

This is actually an issue that impacts Americans, directly; the reason we cannot have the social benefits Denmark has is because we have to spend all our money on military and it's not fair.

Obama admin has two issues with London, (a) they've cut British defense spending too much and it's not fair we have to pay it all, and (b) far worse now Cameron is backing the Chinese World Bank as a founding partner!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s to what it all means to "The special relationship" I do not know, nor perhaps do I care, as the actualities are a million miles above my head. It won't alter my thoughts much - we will see, the world is changing VERY quickly these days. I doubt the USA will pull out of the UK militarily, there are several Airfields of strategic importance, early warning systems etc etc.

True. Well, sigh, yeah the special relationship is over. Now China will be the special relationship, with Britain.

I don't guess it affects anything, but if this gets worse / doesn't get better somehow, then there would be diplomatic repercussions for UK. US would side with Europe on issues of disagreement, between Europe and UK, etc.

I mean -- Cameron isn't helping at all. He's said no to sharing more defense burden, and now he's signed UK up for the China bank!

I don't know where it's going, it's from special relationship to diplomatic adversaries.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nyway, where is Putin ?

Has he still not shown up? :lol:
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 19:11:08

Just to be fair an objective -- like if I were a Brit --

Then yes, if the old Western order is breaking down -- which was led by the USA in partnership with Brits and Europe and then the US allies around the world -- then as American Empire recedes, it makes sense for the UK to latch onto China now and be positioned heading into a "Chinese Century."

It just is what it is.

But having said that, we shouldn't lift a finger to help the UK with anything. They're not acting like an ally at this point. This is like how France turns on us sometimes, we're used to it with the French, we are not used to it from the Brits.

But anyhow we can't force the world to keep the old order. All we can do is adapt to new realities, and it looks like America doing less is the way forward. Because notice something -- if we just stay home, they all just fight each other anyway! In the middle east, in Europe. Maybe the Pacific next. So whatever.

The sticking point is if a war gets too big, then we are dragged in massively, when if only our teammates had stayed on our side from the beginning then we could have prevented it all. Such is the history world wars I, and II.

If the world eschews our leadership, to make a quick buck with our long term adversaries, then honestly for goodness sake -- let's ignore that next world war this time. If our allies do not help us to prevent world wars, then we should not have to bleed on their beaches -- in the future -- due to their folly. Just my opinion about it.

This China bank could be a canary in the coalmine, and undo the whole alliance. Gas mentioned that air bases in UK have strategic value, but if we are not on the same page with the Brits, then there is no strategy to have value over. We actually do not need the UK to defend America. So if UK ever does things that help to endanger us in the Pacific, then what is that about, how is that an ally.

The China Bank is a NEW WORLD BANK. The OLD world bank isn't just about developing places and loaning money out, it's a form of CONTROL. So the old World Bank is run by the USA and Europeans and Brits. This NEW China World Bank seeks to supplant that, with CHINA at the head of it. Do you guys see that point? It's a way for China to extend a hegemony and it's in direct opposition to the old world order and American interests, and Cameron just signed the UK up as a founding partner.

If we've lost the Brits, then the old alliance is just gone, with the Brits will go the Commonwealth and now they'll all join the China World Bank. And then how do we have a nato or any reason to be in Europe, if the rest of the anglo world has signed up with China in the Pacific. It potentially undoes the entire old world order and supplants it with Chinese leadership.

But who knows, maybe that's for the best. There's nothing we can do about it. If Europe and Britain have accepted dictatorships leading in the world, then what can we do. The old world order is just gone. All we can do is go isolationist, and let the rest of the world fight amongst themselves -- and then for our own security, look to our near abroad most of all and keep any trouble out of there.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 20:25:31

Rumors are spreading in Moscow that Putin is dead----killed during a violent sexual assault by a porpoise.

Image
Get off me Flipper---oh....that tickles....OW! that HURTS! FLIPPER NO NO NO NYET NYET AAAASHHSHSHSSGHGHGGHGHGH!

----------------------------------
The word on the street is that Putin's last request was to be buried bare-chested in his coffin.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 20:36:44

@plant
Normally I'd chuckle, but "coup" and instability in Russia constitute the #1 risk to all of us. It's those darn nukes. Where is their president. What if Norway fires off a science research missile like it did in the 90s, and because of disorganization in Russia the message doesn't get passed and then some general turns all the full launch keys on. If their president is missing, gone away somehow for some reason, then who gets that football at 3am?

Putin Watch, Day 9.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy has Putin gone missing?

The fast-moving iceberg of speculation may melt as fast as it emerged. The Kremlin has now started pushing harder against the rumors, trying to prove that Russia's foremost -- nay, only -- major political leader, is alive and well.

...

Whatever Putin is doing at this exact moment -- whether he is hunting tigers, visiting with friends, or convalescing from an illness -- and no matter what he does in the days ahead, the Internet tempest of the past few days is a reminder that the man who embodies today's Russian state, who dismantled the country's once-fledgling democracy, won't be around forever. Which raises the question, what then?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/13/opinions/ghitis-putin-where-is-he/


Some still saying there could be an ongoing coup:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xpert: Vladimir Putin’s Disappearance Could Mean Russia’s Undergoing a Coup

Russia-watchers including Michael Caputo and Tom Nichols have put forward a darker theory: Russia is in the middle of a coup, and if hard-liners win, Russian nukes could wind up pointed at the world’s major cities.

“One thing is for sure: while this plays out, the world is in far more danger than we were in February,” writes Caputo. “Pray for us all.”

Of course, the rumors could all amount to nothing, but Russian goings-on haven’t exactly assuaged the world’s fears.

...

Then things got a little weirder on Friday night when Russian TV channel Rossiya 24 reported that Putin had met with Kyrgyzstan President Almazbek Atambayev — days before the meeting was scheduled to take place.

...

Peskov also denied the rumor that Putin had flown abroad for the birth of his love child with mistress Alina Kabayeva.

While the world waits for news of Putin’s whereabouts and condition, the hashtag “#ПутинУмер” (“Putin is dead”) surfaced on Twitter, gaining steam as people speculated as to the Russian autocrat’s fate.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/14/vladimir-putins-disappearance-could-mean-russias-undergoing-a-coup/
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 21:33:45

cnn: "and no matter what he does in the days ahead, the Internet tempest of the past few days is a reminder that the man who embodies today's Russian state, who dismantled the country's once-fledgling democracy, won't be around forever."

I think they mean to say, dismantled their once-fledgling loot-ocracy. lol. A "democracy" where most are in dire poverty while wealth is pumped into the West along with their resources, is no democracy at all.

But I'm glad you're starting to get it. Putin is the only lynchpin in the nuclear chain that *doesn't* want to launch the nukes. If he changes his mind, or somehow loses operational control; we're toast.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Sat 14 Mar 2015, 22:19:03

Putin has the flu says CIA
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ussian President Vladimir Putin is sick with the flu, according to a Gawker report citing a CIA official who was not identified. The report Saturday came after almost a week of rumors speculating that Putin had died because he has not been seen in public since March 5.

No other details were included in the Gawker report, which contradicts unsubstantiated theories about Putin’s demise that began to swirl after the Russian president canceled a visit to Kazakhstan this week. Reuters later quoted a Kazakh government source who said, “It looks like [Putin] has fallen ill.” This statement was given extra credence when Putin subsequently rescheduled a meeting with officials in South Ossetia.

Russian officials have consistently denied reports of Putin’s death. Friday, the Kremlin-controlled television channel NTV broadcast footage appearing to show the president meeting with Vyacheslav Lebedev, chairman of the Supreme Court of Russia, although the time and date of the meeting wasn’t immediately clear.

link

This appears to be the most likely case since, if he were dead, there would be visible movements and actions being taken by both Russia and other governments around the world. Trust me, the US intelligence community would know in such an event.

Also, Russia has very clear lines of succession just like we do, and had a lot of practice in the 80's transitioning between leaders.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby dissident » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 08:52:06

This thread is a Six$ circle jerk. Fantasy projection like pretty much the rest of western attention aimed at Russia.
dissident
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Cog » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 09:33:21

The Putin knob slobberers must be in deep mourning that they can't currently see their hero riding a bear.

Russia is a third world country in rapid decline. Hardly something worthwhile to even talk about.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Withnail » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 10:38:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')he Putin knob slobberers must be in deep mourning that they can't currently see their hero riding a bear.

Russia is a third world country in rapid decline. Hardly something worthwhile to even talk about.


Russia is a rather powerful nation which is in control of the world's most valuable stocks of numerous vital resources.

The World Bank ranks it as the world's 5th largest economy on the PPP index. It's a founder member of the UN security council and put the first man in space.

Your comment is utterly moronic.
Withnail
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: Sat 19 Jul 2014, 16:45:10
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby radon1 » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 10:47:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', '
')Russia is a third world country in rapid decline. Hardly something worthwhile to even talk about.


Exactly. Yet they won't even let you die quietly in peace.
radon1
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Thu 27 Jun 2013, 06:09:44
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 14:01:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'B')ut I'm glad you're starting to get it. Putin is the only lynchpin in the nuclear chain that *doesn't* want to launch the nukes. If he changes his mind, or somehow loses operational control; we're toast.


No, Agent, Russian mafia do not actually want to bring on mutually assured destruction.

That's killing the goose. It's obviously bad for business and contrary to the whole point of them wanting to expand and grow.

Russian gov just renovated the old Soviet ice skating rink in Red Square, it's pretty, they've got Moscow looking nice these days. What exactly is the point of turning it all into radioactive dust?

No, they will not push the button. No, there is no leader besides Putin that has even been introduced to the Russian people. Just Medvedev. There is no hard liner that could ever out-Putin, Putin. He's it. That's the weakness of their system, a czar rather than isnstitutions, with nobody that could replace him.

They won't ever do a first strike, the danger is more about an accident or if Russia is destabilized then someone else buying / getting a hold of one of their nukes. Only a crazed terrorist would ever push that button, and generally not even muslims or North Koreans are that crazy. Nobody actually wants to wipe THEMSELVES out, too, that's defeating the whole purpose of whatever one's aims are.

Having said that, "the president of Russia is missing" is more dangerous than a stable Russia, and not something to joke about. It's two competing interests we have, no we can't let Russia start annexing a bunch of places but also it's a risky gamble if we let Russia fall apart too.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sun 15 Mar 2015, 14:47:12, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 14:30:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cid_Yama', 'T')his appears to be the most likely case since, if he were dead, there would be visible movements and actions being taken by both Russia and other governments around the world. Trust me, the US intelligence community would know in such an event.


Ok, so it's illness after all. Would have to be serious illness, or it could really be hiding out or house arrest?

We're at Day 10 now, of the president of Russia missing. That's too long for a flu. A normal flu should knock someone down for a couple days at most. Even if one has the flu, after five days or so surely one can make a phone call to somebody or do some kind of appearance, even if you feel weak and achy, just sit in a chair and talk to someone on tv a little bit.

Conspiracy theories out there: some say Putin is in their norad-style fortified nuke bunker in the mountains.

Some say there have been tanks positioned in Moscow:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ussian Tanks Position Themselves Around Moscow?

Image
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/03/russian-tanks-position-themselves-around-moscow-3122166.html


And then, some say there really is some kind of coup and that the president of Russia is under some sort of house arrest:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Has Vladimir Putin been 'neutralised' by security chiefs staging 'secret coup'?

Vladimir Putin is alive but has been 'neutralised' by shadowy security chiefs who have staged a stealthy coup, according to the head of a leading Russian Muslim group.

Geydar Dzhemal, chairman of Russia's Islamic Committee, claimed former security service chief Nikolai Patrushev was behind the plot.


The Russian leader hasn't been seen in public for the past 9 days.

Dzhemal, who is seen as a Kremlin loyalist, said: "I think that Putin is neutralised at the moment, but of course, he is alive.

"He is under the control of the power-wielding agencies, who have, in my opinion, organised a coup d'etat."

...

"My information is that Patrushev met Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov in Pyatigorsk on 11 March and tempted him over to his side."

He also pointed to a recent visit by Patrushev - head of Putin's security council and seen as a Putin crony - to the US.

The visit came despite sanctions barring visits by most senior Russian officials.

"I think he was offered something there that he failed to reject," claimed Dzhemal on Georgian TV channel Rustavi-2.


...

With feverish speculation in Moscow over Putin's health and whereabouts, and claims of a bitter power struggle in his entourage which could even trigger an attempted coup, the head of Chechnya spoke emotionally of people "trying to harm the president of Russia - and Russia itself".

And he claimed that forces were scheming "to break us apart", referring to him and his guarantor Putin.


As startling has been the lack of shows of support in recent days from other senior Kremlin cardinals during an absence which has no obvious parallel in his 15 years as president or premier.

The voices of prime minister Dmitry Medvedev, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Chief of the Kremlin staff Sergei Ivanov - and Putin's intelligence tsars - have remained silent.


...

"He is phoning anyone he can in an attempt to arrange a talk with Putin - but he fails," alleged a website linked to Islamic hardliners seeking to overthrow Kadyrov.

One of the two men formally charged with killing opposition leader Boris Nemtsov is a personal friend of Kadyrov, who spoke out in his support for the second time yesterday.

...

There are allegations that a security official closer to Kadyrov ordered the Nemtsov murder, and that the FSB and Interior Ministry in Moscow have full proof.

His slaying has triggered bitter factional infighting in the Kremlin, which includes talk of defence and security service generals seeking to replace Putin.

Others believe Putin will reemerge tomorrow to stamp his authority once more on his government.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/vladimir-putin-been-neutralised-security-5338390


SO IF IT'S A HARD LINER COUP -- then who will be in charge? Would Putin be kept as a figurehead, but other powers at the throne holding the czar hostage?

WHAT DOES A HARDLINER COUP mean for the West? What would they do differently? Invade more stuff? What?

Hm.. I'm going to go out on a limb with a possible scenario.. maybe there's been some sort of coup and Putin would be figurehead but it will be like a "hybrid presidency" that will allow for even more "hybrid war" and really generals and hardliners will be in charge but those will be "little green men" and Western leaders won't be able to know who to really talk to.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')utin's absence
When the tsar vanishes

Disappearing acts have served past Russian leaders well
http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21646400-history-presents-interesting-reasons-why-autocrat-might-disappear-public-view-tsar-vanishes


EDIT: I re-read the Mirror article, is it suggesting a US-approved coup? The article says Patrushev recently visited the US.

(let's not run wild out into the weeds with that, this is just one article in the Mirror, a British tabloid)

The article says that people have been trying to call Putin but can't get him on the phone. And it says that it's notable that no senior political people in Russia, like Medvedev, have said anything in support of Putin during his absence.

What do you guys think? Has there been some kind of coup after all?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Kremlin says Putin is "healthy," but not seen for a week

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sun 15 Mar 2015, 15:18:47

A hardliner coup... lets start with the Kharkov and Kiev; critical infrastructure destroyed within minutes, and sacked within a day or two. There wouldn't be warning at all; we'd just click drudge, and pictures showing Kiev irrecoverably broken will just appear out of nowhere. Lyvy would be left untouched as a magnet to draw Western preferring UA citizens West, away from the front. With critical industries wrecked, which are all East of Kiev; UA's warfighting capability ceases to exist without billions of dollars of flat out military gifts from NATO. But the real game pushes along the Azov coast and creates the landbridge. While the landbridge is more expensive than the Kerch bridge; the Kerch bridge looks like a woosy/pansy surrender; and the hardliners will want something more akin to glory than to economic rationality. Land bridge comes into existence, and Russian troops abandon Kiev to fall back to the Dneiper; and they will kill like its WWII. Hundreds of thousands will die.

I'd also expect the *RUSSIAN SIDE* of the UA gas pipelines to be destroyed by Russia, and they'll blame UA terrorists while rolling their eyes and giggling.

This would of course be bad for Russia, but the hardliners that would gain control aren't looking for mansions in London. They are looking for glory's past days. The Russian people will largely accept this; especially if the hardliners arrange something that looks like a Western assassination of Putin.

There is also one other problem. Right now, people do not believe, in the West, that Russia will use its nukes. The hardliners *need* to nuke a city, in order for Europe to take them seriously.

That city is Lyvy after its drawn refugees from Kiev.

That is what a hardliner coup will look like.

That said. Putin is either just taking a vacation, or has/had the flu. Its the rational explanation. He's probably trolling twitter via a proxy account or watching TV. Nothing interesting, other than our own desperate fear that Putin might actually be gone.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron