What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.
by Sixstrings » Fri 13 Mar 2015, 23:11:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'W')e Limeys still love you Yanks !!!!!!!!!!!
Well, just to note, I'm not a yankee. A yankee is from New England.

But I get your point and you're a bit of alright Gas. You're like old England, and then there's Withnail and Quinn and all these mixed up folk in Britain now -- communists, socialists, Scottish secessionist socialists, and bankster tories that don't really believe in anything, not like old Thatcher did, I don't know about this Cameron fellow.
Obama admin was against Scottish secession. That Cameron was honestly a tool all through that thing too, I remember, he told Scots "if you don't like me you can just vote against me" -- it was literally Yanukovich's line. So anyhow Obama was against secession, but like always things always blow back on us and no good deed goes unpunished.
So now the re-United Kingdom just goes and joins Team China. A pivot to Asia that's about trade is fine, but not a pivot maneuver on our own flank, from our ally.
Forbes magazine calls it an "astonishing departure" from the norms of British diplomacy:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy British Prime Minister Cameron Is Stiffing Obama To Court Beijing
In an astonishing departure from normal British diplomacy, Cameron has broken ranks to back the Chinese initiative. The Obama White House has retaliated by publicly criticizing the Cameron government for its “constant accommodation” of China. The Obama slap-down is well timed because Cameron is facing an exceptionally tough general election in less than two months.
(is there anything that can be done about this? can Obama make entreaties to Labour Party over there? Guys, O is right on this one, Cameron has now crossed Obama AND American conservatives. Republicans won't be for the UK joining up with Team China against the US.)
Forbes says it may be "personal" dislike Cameron has for Obama. Republicans don't like Obama either, but you don't go and join Team China over it:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o why did Cameron do it? Part of it may be personal. Rumors have swirled for years about his uneasy relations with Obama.
And then here is the main reason Forbes gives, that I guessed already -- UK just wants the foreign cash. Our ally has been bought for some bits of silver.

Was this the only way? Are things that bad in England?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')lthough the United Kingdom’s participation in the new bank has been presented as just another instance of the export of British “financial expertise,” a little noticed underlying fact is that the United Kingdom is close to national bankruptcy. How so? Because it has been running ever larger current account deficits. These recently were running at an astounding 6 percent of GDP, which means they have doubled since 2010 when Cameron took office.
It is a fair bet that without constant infusions of Chinese cash, the British pound would be toast – certainly British finances are in far worse shape than they were even in the mid-1970s when, in an immensely humiliating development for the British establishment, the International Monetary Fund was sent in to London to sort things out. Meanwhile, unlike the United States, the United Kingdom lacks the fallback position that it can borrow abroad in its own currency.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/eamonnfingl ... krupt-u-k/ Hm. So Britain is broke, the same Britain that was flush on Russian money but that wasn't enough either and now they need Chinese money now, so I guess going forward Britain is bought and paid for by China all because they need the money.
This is why I do not like Cameron, he's like a used car salesman, there are no core values with him.He sold us down the river for Chinese money.
Well.. then there is this, we don't have the money to give you Brits because we've got some troubles ourselves:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') major difference compared to previous times is that the United Kingdom cannot go to the United States with a begging bowl because U.S. external finances are almost as bad as the U.K.’s.
I don't know. I guess you guys have done what you had to. It's okay. We'll be the last city on a hill. As Britain sells out to China, we'll uphold anglo values in the world. The magna carta. John Locke. A thousand years of English common law, rule of law, what's right versus what's wrong.
Meanwhile, Britain is bought and paid for now. Russians on one side, Chinese on the other.

A UK that's bought won't even be able to ever say anything in support of Hong Kong. Brits have just been bought off, now.
Gas -- you're a bit of alright and I don't mean any of this directed at you.
British gov is just broke. Maybe we're broke too, but we're hard-headed like Russians are -- we won't sell out, never, we'll never bow to Beijing or give up our ideals. It's what defines us. There is no "America," without our ideals, while Britain is apparently for sale and we just didn't have the money to keep them as a friend so off they go to the other side.
This will be a developing story, guys. It's a major diplomatic rift.
The best the Cameron gov can do at this point will be to PROVE that they're not full of BS and haven't just sold out, that they really can influence the Chinese World Bank. To prove that British credibility was not just bought and paid for, that they are not just a Chinese poodle now, and a token founder of this new Chinese World Bank.
But I have to say, I find that hard to believe. China's not going to change their aims and plans, for the UK. All they did here was buy a patina of British credibility.
Cameron will have to do a lot of work to fix this row with Washington. It's just not good, never should have been a public disagreement like this.
If it doesn't get fixed, I'll predict right now what you will see happen -- Washington would just start backing the EU on everything, any disagreement UK and EU has, US will back the EU. And I don't know what to say other than that, if UK needs the money so badly I guess.
Anyhow -- it's just a shame this has happened, that Cameron could not have even coordinated things so they don't look like a surprise and rift, to at least lessen the damage to US leadership in the Pacific.I don't know what to say, I love you "limey's" too, but looks like y'all have pulled a France on us. Actually, not even the French have ever done anything like this. (I hate that this is directed at you Gas, I do like you quite a bit and really who cares about world bankers and crap -- except if it ever gets down to our guys having to fight in the Pacific and maybe that was made worse by the actions of Britain.)