by TemplarMyst » Sat 07 Mar 2015, 02:02:05
DesuMaiden wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')hit. Looks like my goose has been cooked too, so to speak. What the heck I am supposed to do now?
Well, I know this is going to sound rather counter-intuitive, Desu, but if the energy apocalypse is going to be avoided, I'd suggest maybe re-examining some of the assumptions about what might happen with those nuclear plants.
I realize nuclear power provokes strong emotional reactions. It did with me too, at least initially. However, I've largely reversed course. I used to think they all needed to be decommissioned as soon as possible. Now, I think they may play one of the more vital roles in dealing with that energy apocalypse you fear. Or, well, they might, if we view them differently than we currently do.
You can link to my user ID to see my other posts, and for a very recent exchange on one of the News articles you might want to take a look at the most recent
TEPCO/Fukushima article, and the Comments section in particular. It provides a pretty lively discussion on exactly how dangerous those plants are, and it's a good introduction to why some folks, like myself, see nuclear power as more of a help than a threat. It also has plenty of folks on the other side.
Bottom line is those plants, and the fuel they use, could provide a way out of the apocalypse. One I don't think renewable energy, or powering down, can or will. Just some food for thought.