Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Who owns everything?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Who owns everything?

Unread postby Rickenbacker » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 19:09:05

If most people are renting or pay mortgages on their properties, if most people are in debt, if most people have to take out loans to buy things, if few people actually own any land, then who does everything belong to?

Is it the people who own all the private banks?

If inflation hikes and people can't pay off their debts then do the banks reclaim everything? Is that a sensible idea? Do we still have land barons only with more comfortable serfs?

Also, what is the definition of 'land'? If you own three floors half way up a 40 storey building is that land?

(Probably been discussed before, but a quick search didnt turn up anything.)
User avatar
Rickenbacker
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby Jack » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 19:15:27

Here's something - though a bit dated.

Wealth Distribution

As you'll notice, the top 5% owns more than 2/3 of the wealth - which would, at the least, include securities, bank accounts, land, and real estate. Some will be small business owners, others will be senior executives, some will be physicians...
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Rickenbacker » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 19:40:08

With trends for wealth inequality increasing, I guess that means the bottom 80% are our future serfs. There was a guy who got assassinated, some politician whose name I forget, who said something like:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')sic)'If we had a barbeque, and one man took enough food for nine people, then those nine would damn well make him come back and put most of it back on the table!'


But I forget, 'wealth is too important to be left to the poor'. I'm sure we can trust the rich to be generous and benevolent with our share :P

100 posts, WOOHOO, a centenary of [smilie=XXspam.gif] And now I'm cheaper to refine!!!!
User avatar
Rickenbacker
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue 04 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby cube » Sat 25 Jun 2005, 23:02:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rickenbacker', '.').........

But I forget, 'wealth is too important to be left to the poor'.

...........
ha ha that's a good quote. Here's another

Wealth does not spread but famine does.

African proverb

so true. :-D

I don't think inequality is too important so long as you keep the masses in the dark. The secret is to create a system where people have a vested interest in supporting it. At least on surface. But if you look deeper the system actually works against the public.

Take for example wars. Wars are paid for thru inflation not taxes....the British learned this the hard way with their "former" colonists. It's actually quite simple. To pay for a war just create some bonds. The bonds are paid back using cheaper currency in the future due to inflation. :-D
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby joewp » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 00:59:33

In answer to "Who owns everything (or anything)?" I'd say the answer has to be those that can defend the thing from attackers, or successfuly attack and win posession. As exhibit one, I present the recent US Supreme Court decision that allows government to take an individual's private property and give it to corporations or other wealthy entities for the profit of that entity AND the government. Somehow, that is now the definition of "public use".

Screw the people in those houses in New London. They don't count cause they worked all their lives to make the corporations rich. Hell, the whole peak oil thing boils down to corporations and bankers gathering wealth from the common man at an increasing rate, greased by oil.
Joe P. joeparente.com
"Only when the last tree is cut; only when the last river is polluted; only when the last fish is caught; only then will they realize that you cannot eat money." - Cree Indian Proverb
User avatar
joewp
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Keeping dry in South Florida

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 05:01:57

This is the kind of thing that brought on the French Revolution, we'd better all read up on it, extra points for getting in some Victor Hugo.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby shakespear1 » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 05:12:51

It is not the "banks" that will own everything. Itis the people that OWN the banks :)

By using just the term banks we ascribe the actions to a "thing", THE BANK.

It is not a THING, it is someone. Someone built the structure and method of operation of this thing and reaps the benefits. :shock:

This transfer of responsibility to "things" is widely practiced throughout the ages.
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Claudia » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 08:03:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f most people are renting or pay mortgages on their properties, if most people are in debt, if most people have to take out loans to buy things, if few people actually own any land, then who does everything belong to?

Is it the people who own all the private banks?


It's even more complicated, because banks are selling off ownership of their mortgages to other financial investment companies, which then make their way into individual 401K's. So I probably own one millionth of the mortgage of some guy in Kansas.
Claudia
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu 26 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 08:54:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')lso, what is the definition of 'land'? If you own three floors half way up a 40 storey building is that land?


No. It is not land.

I know this because I'm from Hawaii, which has a rather unique real estate setup. The shadow of monarchy and feudalism still hangs over Hawaian real estate. A lot of the property there is leased from a few wealthy owners. Usually 100-year leases. So much so, that if a house comes with the property it's built on, that is a selling point. ("Fee simple" are the words to look for.)

Once the 100-year lease is up, you can get another lease, you can convert to fee simple (usually for big bucks), or you can be kicked out of your house. Some people actually move their houses to another piece of property, but it's expensive, and the house is never the same afterwards.

When I was a kid, I lived in a condo on the 8th floor of a building that was built on leased land. The lease expired, and the association was able to purchase the land. It meant each condo owner had to put up some money. (I think it was around $5,000 each.)

So, whether you have any claim on property depends on the fine print. I'm not a Realtor or a lawyer, but my understanding is that condos are real property; if you own a fee simple condo, you have a deed, and a share in the land it is built on. With a co-op, you don't get a deed. Instead, you get shares in the corporation that owns the co-op.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby CARVER » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 10:12:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joewp', 'I')n answer to "Who owns everything (or anything)?" I'd say the answer has to be those that can defend the thing from attackers, or successfuly attack and win posession ...


I agree.

At which point are a lot of people going to say: "I'm not gonna work for you anymore, I'm not gonna pay you back. If you try to take my house away from me I will defend myself." Will the police remove them by force? What if it is the people working for the police force themselves who stop paying their mortgages? Do you think they will remove themselves?

If the rich push things too far, the middle class will group and remove the upper class. You got to keep the workers happy for the system to work. The rich may own it, but it is an illusion to think they have full control over what happens to it. They still own it because they don't have to defend it yet.
User avatar
CARVER
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu 19 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Unread postby shakespear1 » Sun 26 Jun 2005, 10:53:11

The only middle class that I see sticking up for itself is in France and Germany. The rest of the countries either don't get in the news or the middle class is simply taking it quietly or maybe they are doing OK.

I think at some point people will realize that the Global Economy is beneficial to a small % of society. In the end you need a job to be able to buy the things coming from China or Indonesia. :roll:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Who owns everything?

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Mon 04 Jul 2005, 21:34:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rickenbacker', 'I')f most people are renting or pay mortgages on their properties, if most people are in debt, if most people have to take out loans to buy things, if few people actually own any land, then who does everything belong to?

Is it the people who own all the private banks?


Interesting question - if you own a freehold house, there's no question about who owns it. If you have a mortgage, you still own the house, but the bank owns your mortgage debt and you've contracted with them to repay, so that if you default the bank gets control of your asset. But your loan from the bank is both an asset and a liability to them, so the bank doesn't gain if you default. It'll generally lose money, as it'll have to sell the house to cover its corresponding liability, and probably won't get top dollar in doing so.

So I think the answer is no, the banks don't own everything. But you could easily suspect so.
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Zentric » Mon 04 Jul 2005, 23:17:10

Stopping along the roadways on the West Coast of the US, I'd always see historical plaques telling you how particular Mexican, Spanish, French or Russian generals or admirals, each were deeded huge tracts of land for heroism in battle, etc.

Gradually, over the following several hundred years, these tracts got parceled out into settlements or cities, where presumably the general or admiral's descendents stood to collect extraordinary sums of money from real estate developers. The proceeds from these sales then likely get diversified into other assets.

Family ownership of land, especially in a young country like the US, probably accounts for a large concentration of today's wealth.
User avatar
Zentric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon 14 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 05 Jul 2005, 00:33:07

Shakespear1 this is why I'd be open to moving to France, but it turns out it takes an insane amount of money to do so.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron