[Petro]

I was just going to whine and ask if anyone knows where I could listen to a replay (I fell asleep the first 30 mins doh!), but I don't know. Its sounds like a dissappointing show? What the hell was Hogie doing there anyway? It might as well have been David Ike.

[SD_Scott]

On page seven of his latest, Matt mentions the figure 10 to 20 trillion. It's the report labeled "investing in an uncertain energy future".




http://www.simmonsco-intl.com/research. ... msspeeches

[Geko45]

Nevermind.

[Keith_McClary]

Comment on the Archdruid blog
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')att Savinar said...
JMG,

nice post.

don't know what to make of this and I may be too conspiratorial but the WSJ sent out a reporter to interview me the other day, was very interested in me being an astrologer and fracking.

seemed very strange since my PO site (LATOC) has been defunct for four years now

Matt

[ennui2]

I'm sure he's thrilled that someone remembers him enough to feel that it's newsworthy to post a "where are they now" thread-bump. But clearly the guy has moved on, just like a lot of us.

[Loki]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'I')'m sure he's thrilled that someone remembers him enough to feel that it's newsworthy to post a "where are they now" thread-bump. But clearly the guy has moved on, just like a lot of us.

[dashster]

Sounds like the WSJ could be ready to "debunk the Peak Oil theory" again. The biggest thing the "debunkers" offer is past failed predictions with regard to oil production, as their proof of the Infinite Oil theory.

[dolanbaker]

The fact is that most "peak oil" debunkers assume that technology and investment will always provide the goods and growth will continue. So far they've been correct, but recently it's becoming clear that the high price also kills growth. It will be very interesting to see how things play out when the high priced oil leaves the market and we're left with a declining supply of the cheaper stuff.

[dashster]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', 'T')he fact is that most "peak oil" debunkers assume that technology and investment will always provide the goods and growth will continue. So far they've been correct...

[dolanbaker]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dashster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', 'T')he fact is that most "peak oil" debunkers assume that technology and investment will always provide the goods and growth will continue. So far they've been correct..but recently it's becoming clear that the high price also kills growth..

[dashster]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dashster', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', 'T')he fact is that most "peak oil" debunkers assume that technology and investment will always provide the goods and growth will continue. So far they've been correct..but recently it's becoming clear that the high price also kills growth..

[dolanbaker]

They are correct in the fact that oil production has increased, the fact that it costs considerably more to extract is conveniently swept under the carpet. The thing to remember is that the target audience for most of these articles are in the higher income groups and will never experience "fuel poverty".

It is the consumers who do suffer fuel poverty who stop buying when the price goes above a certain level and it is many others who cut back on consumption.