by enkidu » Wed 26 Nov 2014, 09:43:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Ibid.
“It’s non-disprovable, which in the world of science is supposed to mean it’s a non-starter,” said Jack Sava, director of trauma care at MedStar Washington Hospital Center.
Just because you aren't smart enough to disprove something doesn't mean that it's non-disprovable.
Talk about "have you stopped beating your wife yet". Sheesh. "You can't disprove it so it's not scientific".

First you tell people that you can't disprove something (where's your proof about that?) then you try to make it seem wrong because of that.
How many logical fallacies can you cram into one statement?
If the so-called health care (really "illness exploitation") people could figure out how to make money off of this they would have it enshrined in the media for everyone to be instructed to believe. As-is it's can't be true because there's no $$$ behind it.
They practically have a heart attack when the mere mention of a "cure" is brought to light (except as bait for more money like "race for the cure" where no cure will actually result, just another round of fleecing). Then there are secret meetings where amphitheaters of them cheer to the announcements of the newest chronic conditions, their cash cows.
The medical profession is the only one with such deeply ingrained conflicts of interest (your health vs. their bank accounts) exist that they are invisible let alone questioned.
Meanwhile, The Young Turks pick up on the story linking lead poisoning to violent crime.
http://youtu.be/c3eaG_PB5ZU