by Sixstrings » Mon 10 Nov 2014, 21:32:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')ix, peer review is not the measure of human progress. Of Einstein's 300 papers only one was peer-reviewed. There was no fraud in the project. The folks involved were brilliant brave and hard-working. There merely failed. As will your plans. How well you handle the insults, neglect, and depression will be your measure.
Pstarr -- all I remember is it was a bit of a scandal, they brought food in. That ruined the science part of it, no?
Science has to be honest, whether it's climate change scientists that have doctored things sometimes, or if it was the biodome. You have to be honest, the point is the truth, and whatever direction the data takes you.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q')uestioning the credentials of the participants (despite the contribution in the preparation phase of Biosphere 2 of worldwide top-level scientists and among others the Russian Academy of Science), Marc Cooper wrote[41] that "the group that built, conceived, and directs the Biosphere project is not a group of high-tech researchers on the cutting edge of science but a clique of recycled theater performers that evolved out of an authoritarian—and decidedly non-scientific—personality cult". He was referring to the Synergia Ranch in New Mexico, where indeed many of the Biospherians did practice theater under John Allen's leadership, and began to develop the ideas behind Biosphere 2.
...
The other faction included Abigail Alling, the titular director of research[48] inside the bubble, and who sided with John Allen in blocking that move. On February 14, the entire SAC resigned.[49] Time Magazine wrote:
Now, the veneer of credibility, already bruised by allegations of tamper-prone data, secret food caches and smuggled supplies, has cracked ... the two-year experiment in self-sufficiency is starting to look less like science and more like a $150 million stunt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2#Praise_and_criticism So there ya go.. it sounds like part of what did it all in was the basic "transition town" / "commune" group dynamics breakdown that you always see with these things.
And that's interesting too, scientifically. It's not about just growing enough food and maintaining the atmosphere -- you gotta have a working little society, too, that doesn't break down just from personality conflicts, and the dynamics of people just cooped up in a small space for so long.
Also -- while pretty darn cool and worth the research, it's actually not "practical" to make different biomes. One dome is the rain forest, one is a desert, etc.
Fact is, you can feed a lot of people just growing potatoes and nobody needs to go hungry.