Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Space The Final Frontier!

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Quinny » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 07:21:52

Don't know why, but I've somehow missed this thread. I've just read it and must admit a slight exaggeration I've previously been guilty of. I often use the term LMAO or even LMFAO when I am amused at the content of a post but sometimes not actually laughing.

Today I have actually been LMAO!
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 10:22:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')The tech and engineering needed for a space colony is the same as it would be for a biodome in the Gobi desert or on Antarctica or under the ocean, and then more too, due to the particulars of space.


Same? Are you serious? Only more too? I think that is the understatement of this thread, :lol:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile you say it can't be done though, NASA plugs along.


Never said it can't be done. I said it won't be done for two main reasons:

Nowhere to go and no way to get there.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby DesuMaiden » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 13:24:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'N')ot a chance. Our colonization of this planet is turning in to quite a disaster and we have plenty of food, air and water here.

That is a lie. A big fat ****** lie. Their isn't plenty of food and water left because we quiet frankly running out of every essential natural resource at a phenomenal rate
Last edited by Tanada on Fri 07 Nov 2014, 23:57:50, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: profanity cut
History repeats itself. Just everytime with different characters and players.
DesuMaiden
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 888
Joined: Mon 06 Oct 2014, 16:00:31

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 16:28:55

User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 20:47:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DesuMaiden', 'T')hat is a lie. A big fat fucking lie.


Whoah whoah easy hold on there cowgirl, you just joined this forum you have to be around here long enough to get to know some people first and get about 1,000 posts under your belt and THEN you can get irrationally angry and drop the F bomb in the space colony thread.

Nice to see you're not a spammer though, some spunk there. :razz:

Let's watch the F bomb, folks, I cuss too much it's actually low class let's watch it.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Fri 07 Nov 2014, 21:00:11, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 21:10:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'S')ame? Are you serious? Only more too? I think that is the understatement of this thread, :lol:


Yes, I'm serious.

It's a major challenge, as you pointed out. It hasn't been done yet. Name me one total closed loop self-sustaining greenhouse biodome artificial enclosure that is able to support those inside, totally sealed off, and can handle everything from scrubbing the carbon out of the air to growing enough food and allllllll of that.

It hasn't been done that. Doesn't matter if it's in space or in the Gobi or under the Pacific ocean, it's a big challenge. It's trying to make a total ecosystem, but in such a small space.

And then parts go bad.. and you're always gonna need some kind of something brought in like that.. so that's the challenge.

3d printers will make all the difference. It'll still be hard, though.

I wonder why nobody has *seriously* tried another BioDome, not that stupid thing from the 90s but with some real government money from NASA. It's not technically impossible we just have not done it yet; total enclosed closed loop little ecosystem.

We actually need to study that anyway, it's general science knowledge needed for space and Mars habitats.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ever said it can't be done. I said it won't be done for two main reasons:

Nowhere to go and no way to get there.


You say nowhere to go, you did not address:

* in orbit around Jupiter, safe from radiation within the magnetosphere

* on Jupiter's moon Europa, undersea colony, ice cap protecting from meteor impact and radiation

* Mars, just put soil around the habitat for radiation shield, (I say europa's best though)

* Moon -- again, lunar dust compacted around habitats will stop radiation. We should do the moon just because it's so close.

Europa is best, over all.

Mars will be tried first.

Secondly, you can "get there" with even 1960s saturn V rocket tech. And the Falcon Heavy will be so cheap that this private mars society may actually hire a launch out and do a private human mars flyby, or even their own way ticket martian base. (which would be depressing, they don't got the real funding for that, they'll just all die and we'd be horrified and it'll set it all back a long time)

Elon Musk says he won't take SpaceX public because the stated purpose of the company is to make money and develop tech so he can send people to Mars.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 21:26:40

And another thing, Monte, you seem incredulous that there's not much difference between and undersea colony and a space colony.

Fact is, there is not.

A space habitat is just a tin can. It doesn't take a lot. Skylab was just a hollow stage of a Saturn V rocket. And it got too hot in there for some reason, I can't remember, and they actually put a big tarp outside for some shade and that solved the problem.

Any undersea colony is about the same tech. Like a submarine, that's sealed off and can withstand pressure -- you don't even have any pressure in the vacuum of space, zero pressure. Deep sea is actually more difficult.

All you need is a tin can, pretty much. I think the ISS has some covering on the outside to protect from micrometeorites, I forget the details, but micrometeors are like getting blasted with a sandblaster so yeah you need some kevlar or whatever they're using that can withstand erosion and impacts up to a certain diameter.

Orbital stations would always take damage, over time, and on mars there are sandstorms. Martian concrete made on the spot would hold up fine.

For orbital colonies, you'd have to have mining set up be getting all the ores ya need, and then 3d printers and resource processing like that so you can patch the station up as needed.

Here's an interesting question that I don't quite know the answer to: would the moons of jupiter have all the elements you need, to make anything you need?

I'm guessing not. To be totally self sustaining forever then you need to get at any element you will need, I would guess, so that's rare earth elements (maybe more plentiful on other bodies), gold, whatever it is we actually need to make hardware and equipment.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 21:39:39

Something which has never been done on this planet where moving stuff around costs virtually nothing, will only require "a tin can" fucking space cadet,
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Subjectivist » Fri 07 Nov 2014, 21:45:16

For going on a quarter of a century humans have been building spacecraft with ion propulsion. Ten times as fuel efficient as chemical rockets, long slow accelleration/deceleration curves instead of Hohman thrust and coast orbits.

You can't get off the ground with them because they only work in a vacuum environment, but as the old saying goes get to low earth orbit and you are half way to anywhere in our Sol system.

Don't take my word for it, start with Wiki and chase down the leads you find there.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby DesuMaiden » Sat 08 Nov 2014, 21:55:31

I doubt people will colonize space.
History repeats itself. Just everytime with different characters and players.
DesuMaiden
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 888
Joined: Mon 06 Oct 2014, 16:00:31

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 08 Nov 2014, 22:49:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')o you think NASA could have done better? For all its faults it was an impressive endeavor. I doubt we will ever see anything so ambitious again.

Image


I agree. BUT.. at the time it was cool yes but it wasn't really "hard science." As I vaguely recall, I was a kid back then.

It wasn't something that was being done by someone that could publish any peer review articles etc, real science, and that's why it turned out to have some fraud in the project.

I wonder whatever happened to it. All those cool greenhouses. Research -- but honest and scientific -- should have continued.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Nov 2014, 12:20:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')You say nowhere to go,


No where to go that doesn't need to be supported from earth indefinitely. No class M planet where there is life.

Might be one out there in the cosmos, but we have no way to get there, even at light speed.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Nov 2014, 12:24:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'A')nd another thing, Monte, you seem incredulous that there's not much difference between and undersea colony and a space colony.

Fact is, there is not.


You just go on believing that. Ever hear of earth's gravity well, for starters?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 10 Nov 2014, 21:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'S')ix, peer review is not the measure of human progress. Of Einstein's 300 papers only one was peer-reviewed. There was no fraud in the project. The folks involved were brilliant brave and hard-working. There merely failed. As will your plans. How well you handle the insults, neglect, and depression will be your measure.


Pstarr -- all I remember is it was a bit of a scandal, they brought food in. That ruined the science part of it, no?

Science has to be honest, whether it's climate change scientists that have doctored things sometimes, or if it was the biodome. You have to be honest, the point is the truth, and whatever direction the data takes you.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q')uestioning the credentials of the participants (despite the contribution in the preparation phase of Biosphere 2 of worldwide top-level scientists and among others the Russian Academy of Science), Marc Cooper wrote[41] that "the group that built, conceived, and directs the Biosphere project is not a group of high-tech researchers on the cutting edge of science but a clique of recycled theater performers that evolved out of an authoritarian—and decidedly non-scientific—personality cult". He was referring to the Synergia Ranch in New Mexico, where indeed many of the Biospherians did practice theater under John Allen's leadership, and began to develop the ideas behind Biosphere 2.

...

The other faction included Abigail Alling, the titular director of research[48] inside the bubble, and who sided with John Allen in blocking that move. On February 14, the entire SAC resigned.[49] Time Magazine wrote:
Now, the veneer of credibility, already bruised by allegations of tamper-prone data, secret food caches and smuggled supplies, has cracked ... the two-year experiment in self-sufficiency is starting to look less like science and more like a $150 million stunt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2#Praise_and_criticism


So there ya go.. it sounds like part of what did it all in was the basic "transition town" / "commune" group dynamics breakdown that you always see with these things.

And that's interesting too, scientifically. It's not about just growing enough food and maintaining the atmosphere -- you gotta have a working little society, too, that doesn't break down just from personality conflicts, and the dynamics of people just cooped up in a small space for so long.

Also -- while pretty darn cool and worth the research, it's actually not "practical" to make different biomes. One dome is the rain forest, one is a desert, etc.

Fact is, you can feed a lot of people just growing potatoes and nobody needs to go hungry.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

NASA leases airfield to google, for space and robotics

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 10 Nov 2014, 22:08:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')oogle moves into Nasa’s space

Image

Google has taken a 60-year lease on a Nasa airfield next to its Silicon Valley headquarters as it pushes deeper into researching areas like space exploration and vehicles capable of navigating other planets.
The lease includes a commitment to spend $200m on the facilities at the Moffett airfield, including renovating a gigantic, historic airship hangar that has become a prominent local landmark.

...

Announcing a deal with Google on Monday, Nasa said the Moffett facilities would be used for “research, development, assembly and testing in the areas of space exploration, aviation, rover/robotics and other emerging technologies”.

Google has not disclosed any plans of its own to engage in interplanetary exploration, though it has offered a $20m prize for any private mission before the end of next year that can land a robot on the moon, travel 500 meters and send back images.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a4bb0fca-692b-11e4-9eeb-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3Ie8Wf0kp


And some google robot news:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/gif/2014/11/10/b7a6cea214329b3ed4f06488058dd4152b55d564.gif[/img]

Terrifying two legged giant robot being developed by Google learns to stand on one leg

THE ATLAS ROBOT

According to Boston Dynamics, Atlas is a 'high mobility, humanoid robot designed to negotiate outdoor, rough terrain.

'Atlas can walk bipedally leaving the upper limbs free to lift, carry, and manipulate the environment.
'In extremely challenging terrain, Atlas is strong and coordinated enough to climb using hands and feet, to pick its way through congested spaces.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2829213/The-robo-karate-kid-Terrifying-two-legged-giant-robot-developed-Google-learns-stand-one-leg-recreates-scene-cult-film.html
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Are humans likely to colonize space?

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 11 Nov 2014, 05:45:27

If I were wealthy enough to do something like bio dome project I would prioritize differently. The first step of any successful closed system has to be long term survival. When the first people's crossed from Siberia to Alaska via Berengia it was no walk in the park. Modern humans seem to think nature was all just a giant Yellowstone where they could wander around with impunity. In reality there were dangers lurking everywhere from getting trampled by herd animals to getting hunted by wolf packs or eaten by short face bears. Not to mention all the unfamiliar plants many of which are poison if you eat them or cause painful chemical rashes or puncture wounds if you touch them.

Those first people's faced a very dangerous task in the beginning, but they learned what to avoid, or they died trying. By some estimates once they had a toe hold in North America it took less than 1,000 years for their descendants to spread all the way to Tierra Del Fuego at the southern tip of South America.

If you want something like bio dome to serve as a colony prototype it has to be as self sufficient as you can make it. Air and water need to be fully recycled, food has to be grown, and nutrients have to be recycled with nearly perfect efficiency. The closest we have ever come is the Space Stations we have put in orbit, but they all get a constant influx of food from outside.

Did you know that food provides almost all of the water and air the astronauts need? When humans digest food they break it down into water, carbon dioxide and nitrogen gas. The water created is put through electrolysis to get back the oxygen needed. Outside water arrives in the moisture content of some of the foods and in the shuttle days hundreds of gallons of water would be left on the station at the end of each visit from both the visiting astronauts breath and from the shuttles fuel cell exhaust.

Step one of building a real bio dome would be a plant based carbon dioxide handling system taking in gasses and producing edible plant mass in return. Getting the balance right is not just a case of making some soil and planting a garden.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron