That's exactly what I was trying to say, in my own convoluted, obviously-too-confusing way. Ebola is growing at an exponential rate and is lethal at least 50% of the time.
There is no other disease out there that I know of that has that profile.
Of course, every season flu shows exponential growth for a while, but it doesn't show that growth for more than a few months. As far as I know, no one has claimed that Ebola is seasonal. I was addressing ROCK's claim that we should all just calm down since, at this point, other diseases kill more people.
While we're on the issue, though, at least one disease modeler projects an upwardly curving line on a semi-log scale. Does that suggest more-than-exponential growth?
http://news.sciencemag.org/health/2014/ ... toll-ebola
-------
Newf reported: "27% of US women fear that someone they know will contract ebola."
I wonder what portion of those actually do know someone who is living in or who recently visited East Africa (or some other contiguous area). Anyone in an academic setting is likely to have a classmate or colleague with such a profile. I know quite a few such myself, quite well. People I have meetings with regularly.
And it does not strike me as entirely irrational to be concerned the the coming Hajj might turn out to be a 'perfect' opportunity for Ebola to spread world-wide. Recall that an infected person can remain symptom-free for 21 days. So someone could show up not knowing they have the virus, become symptomatic during the ceremonies, and potentially spread it to any number of people there, people who will then go back to any number of countries all over the world. (There is also the possibility of the rapid spread of MERS for the same reason.)
I personally think that spread from either of these sources is quite unlikely (wishful thinking??), but I couldn't consider someone completely irrational for thinking so, especially when some fairly prominent people have now publicly expressed the concern that it may become airborne.
Frankly the more people (particularly authorities) who are aware, concerned and vigilant about this disease, the less likely it is that it will be able to spread. But it would be too bad if some irrational level of concern distracted people from some more immediate, more realistic threat to themselves or to their communities.
Edit to add: Ah, I see that the actual CNN report says 'they or someone in their family'--that does seem a bit irrational (although those of us with children traveling to certain locations may have some qualms).