Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

why we have to be optimistic (long editorial)

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

why we have to be optimistic (long editorial)

Unread postby thequietkid10 » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 21:04:25

For the vast majority of my Peak Oil news and opinions, I like to go to http://www.thewatt.com. I like it because of its optimism and friendly webmaster. It's a nice change of pace from the site, www.aftertheoilcrash.com (or something along those lines)

Recently though, I read an extremely depressing article about Peak Oil. It was a piece for a college newspaper, written by one of the contributors to theWatt. Basically it said that biomass, nuclear power, synthetic fuels, even conservation, in terms of anything less then flirting with economic self destruction, is powerless in the face of Peak Oil.

He blasted the "neoclassical economists" who believe that some other, more expensive fuel will just take oils place. When I read that article, I felt as if he was saying that the impending oil crisis is hopeless. His view of Peak Oil is not uncommon.

So what did I do? I gave up for a while. I went upstairs turned on the radio, and the Gamecube. I even did something I hadn't been doing, and turned on the light while I was playing, what do I care? its not like keeping this light off is going to help anybody. [Apparently we're all ****ed anyway, regardless of what I do. So I might as well enjoy the time I have left, and remember not to have any children. I settle in for a very long game of Super Smash Brothers Melee. Even after I got bored I kept playing, I wanted to just waste my mind away, like the book Farenheight 451.

This lasted for about 30 minutes. Then I thought of a conversation in Star Wars, *spoilers for those who have been living under a rock*

It was the conversation between Obi Won's ghost and Luke, about Luke's destiny to fight Vader. Luke said that he couldn't do it. It is a valid argument. Vader is an experienced warrior and Luke is a rookie, and it didn't help that Luke had no interest in killing his father.

Obi Won replied to Luke "Then the emperor has already won." In other words, if we don't fight Peak Oil with the confidence that we can beat it, we will never beat it. Essay's like the one currently found on theWatt and other places do not boast people confidence.

Looking back he does offer ways to counter Peak Oil, something I didn't notice the first time. What he says makes sense. (Except that his sources on alternatives energies is Exxon mobile, THE most backwards, anti-global warming, anti-Peak oil, energy company in existence). He does offer solutions which are good ideas. BUT, the tone of his essay, (and mentioning things like our carrying capacity without fossil fuels is 1-3 billion people) does not make it a sell to many in the mainstream.

There is a way to mobilize the mainstream of the world against Peak Oil, even if that means economic sacrifice mentioned in the essay. Sadly too many of those who know about Peak Oil, feel that they have to crucify the American Dream, Capitalism, prosperity, and the 1950s suburban boom to do so. The 1950s was 50 years ago, we don't have a time machine to go back and change, the American Dream is engraved in every single American as a god given right, as much as what is given to us from the Consitution, capitalism is 300 years old. The industrial age is 200 years old. Blaming these factors and doing documentaries about the past is not going to solve the problem in the future (yeah I'm talking to you, producers or End of Suburbia). As Final Fantasy X fans know from Auron "dwelling in the past is futile."

Americans have big egos, we're the oldest current democracy on Earth, and we're the most powerful nation in the world. I think we have the right to be just a little proud.

It wasn't long ago that Americans were known as some of the most resourceful, toughest S.O.Bs on the planet.

If we tell these people that we have a problem, (Peak Oil), but also that with some sacrifice, we can overcome it, and maybe even usher in an energy golden age by 2050, (fusion/hydrogen). I think we're get more support then the "our children are all going to starve unless we become a third world country" argument (over exaggeration but you get the point).

Remember my fellow Peak Oilers, you get more bees with honey then vinegar, think about that next time you introduce Peak Oil to the world.
User avatar
thequietkid10
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: why we have to be optimistic (long editorial)

Unread postby aldente » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 21:25:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', 'R')emember my fellow Peak Oilers, you get more bees with honey than vinegar, think about that next time you introduce Peak Oil to the world.


This is not exactely what's going on here. We're not a business that looks to increase its customer base.

To grasp the underlaying message of Peak Oil and the sheer magnitude of its implications will require the full capacity of your human microprocessor. And just as personalities differ, so do the reactions - dependend on how deep you are able to dive in!
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: why we have to be optimistic (long editorial)

Unread postby Jack » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 22:32:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', 'I')f we tell these people that we have a problem, (Peak Oil), but also that with some sacrifice, we can overcome it, and maybe even usher in an energy golden age by 2050, (fusion/hydrogen).


What if that's untrue? I've been hearing that viable fusion will be here in just 10 years...for nearly 40 years. And that machines will think like a human in just 20 years...for about 30 years.

And, honestly - why should I (or anyone) wish to attract these bees you refer to? Let the vast majority remain unaware and naive; those who are aware can use the extra time.

Unwarranted optimism may make one feel better in the short term, but it does nothing to correct the long term problem.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby thequietkid10 » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 22:44:36

what I'm saying is we need hope.

We need hope so that people are willing to invest there money in alternative energies.

We need hope so that people will listen to us and not allow themselves to be swallowed by deny.

We need hope so that when someone makes a conscience effort to save energy they know that what their doing isn't in vain.

It would be the greatest crime in the history of humanity, if we could beat Peak Oil if we made the effort,

but instead we decided we have no chance, make little to no effort to solve the problem, and as a result mankind falls.

and the we (the young ones like myself) have to oneday face our children, living in shacks, suffering from male nutrition, there only connection to the good life being the stories told from us.
User avatar
thequietkid10
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby bart » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:09:52

Yes, hope. But hope with intelligence. Not hope puffed up by delusions.

There is a real danger of investing our resources in foolish schemes like hydrogen cars and energy sources with a negative return (corn-based ethanol).

The real answers are not glamorous:
1. Meeting our needs with much less energy.
2. Reducing our numbers.

If we are able to develop new energy technologies, so much the better. But we should emphasize conservation/efficiency and population control.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif

Unread postby MicroHydro » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:21:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', 'w')hat I'm saying is we need hope.


No, people need the truth. The current world population and fossil energy usage are not sustainable. Big business and big government can not save the late 20th century way of life.

If people try to work their way through the denial, anger, bargaining, and depression, some of them will come to acceptance. Then they can work on making lifeboats for themselves and those of their friends and family who are willing to try to build a new world instead of clinging to the old doomed world like a child to a baby blanket.

Matt Savinar is quite constructive and recently posted several articles about making a living on a bicycle. People who can't handle his site can't handle the truth.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby LadyRuby » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:25:57

Personally I think we need to shake things up a bit to get the ball rolling, and then there will be reason to hope. I'm not very proud of being an American right now, but I do have to say that Americans can come together, when they really need to, and work together to solve big problems. With the right leadership (NOT W, or anyone like him), and a real understanding of the crisis we're in, I think we can get through it. So yes, let's try to keep some optimism, but we've got to get rolling. We're living in a house of cards!
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Unread postby Jack » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:26:24

You speak of hope, and the good life. But what precisely is "the good life"?

It's like the phrase "The American Dream" that so many speak of, but remains ill-defined.

Is the good life having a private jet, a benz and a ferrari, along with a mansion in a gated community? That may be difficult to achieve.

If I may suggest, distill down what a good life means to you; that isn't the work of a day, or even a year. Define it, write it down, and then reconsider it carefully.

Do you need a car to have the good life? Folks in Victorian England got along happily without them. The Amish do today.

Often, we let others define what we should want, when in fact we don't want them at all. What do you want?

People will invest in alternative energy because they believe they can make a profit; if the project is viable, money will flow. But just wishing for a technology will not make it happen. Keep in mind that diverting limited funds to bad ideas will starve out better ideas. What if we spend our money on fusion, and it's a dead end? Might we not have been better off with something else?

People hope to win the lottery; but they might be wise not to plan on paying their bills by winning it.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

I'm sorry

Unread postby thequietkid10 » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:37:26

I think I need to make something clear. I'm not affraid of "The Second Great Depression" ok. I'm willing to make sacrfices.

If my children have food, shelter, and happiness, I'm fine with that. If that means no TV,no Internet, no Video Games, no music, no Saturday nights in the city, then that's what happens, we'll deal, and wait around (hopefully) for fusion power.

What I don't like about Peak Oil is the part about massive die off. I won't accept that fate, I'm sorry I can't. Population decline because people have less children, fine. Watching, my wife, friends and their familiy, and my family's family, constantly in morning because another loved one has died. I couldn't deal with that.
User avatar
thequietkid10
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I'm sorry

Unread postby Jack » Mon 20 Jun 2005, 23:45:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', 'W')hat I don't like about Peak Oil is the part about massive die off. I won't accept that fate, I'm sorry I can't. Population decline because people have less children, fine. Watching, my wife, friends and their familiy, and my family's family, constantly in morning because another loved one has died. I couldn't deal with that.


Hmm? That depends on who does the dying, doesn't it? Mass starvation already exists, it just doesn't affect you and I.

If it makes you feel any better, those of us in the U.S. and Europe will probably not have the dieoff. Asia and the Middle East probably will, along with Africa. Some of South America probably will.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I'm sorry

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 01:01:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', '
')What I don't like about Peak Oil is the part about massive die off. I won't accept that fate, I'm sorry I can't. Population decline because people have less children, fine. Watching, my wife, friends and their familiy, and my family's family, constantly in morning because another loved one has died. I couldn't deal with that.


That is the way nature works, I am afraid. I have stated it many times: The cumulative biotic potential of any given species always exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment. In other words, all species will breed beyond the limits of their environment.

If it is a population bloom as the result of a heretofore unknown or unaccessible food/energy source (which fossil fuels are) then the scenario is always a crash of the population. Basic eccology.

That is reality. If we manage to put it off, then the dieoff later will be even worse. Get used to the idea. This is nature's way of restoring the balance. Humans are not exempt.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: I'm sorry

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 01:07:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', ' ')Hmm? That depends on who does the dying, doesn't it? Mass starvation already exists, it just doesn't affect you and I.

If it makes you feel any better, those of us in the U.S. and Europe will probably not have the dieoff. Asia and the Middle East probably will, along with Africa. Some of South America probably will.


Yes, the populations with the least health care and those that border on malnutrition already will be the main thrust. Much of it will come from the fact that they will no longer be able to afford the energy for irrigation, fertilizers and pesticides. The Green Revolution will end abruptly. It is already in dire straights as the majority of third-world debt is as a result of it.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Unread postby aldente » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 01:26:51

Quietkid, what if the whole process is something that neither I, nor you, nor anybody else has any control over? It is one of the primary reactions of individuals in complicated situations to state: We have to do this or that to change things... What we're facing though is of a magnitude that's beyond managability.

The actual task is to comprehend the issue and to digest it! It gives you an advantage, don't forget that! "Hope"will always be a fellow traveller, per definition.

Dive in!

Image
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby bart » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:05:55

I am very suspicious of the Die-Off idea.

There is NOT one model of population behavior that all species follow. There are multiple models, multiple curves. This is basic, Ecology 101. Die-off is one possibility, but there are others. It depends on what we do, how we as a species respond

Humans are not like other biological organisms. We are unique in developing a social culture that is passed on over the generations. We are unique in our capacity to modify their environment (both for good and for ill). We and the social insects (ants, termites, bees) are unique in our complex social organizations.

Taking a concept from biology and applying it blindly to human society is intellectually bankrupt. In the early 20th century, the robber barons justified their depradations through Social Darwinism (survival of the fittest). Inevitably these misapplied biological concepts are used as justification for horrendous behavior; that's not happening on this forum that I know of. But as this concept is let loose into the wider world, it will be.

A biological concept can be suggestive, a starting point for investigation. But that's all.

If we want to talk about human societies, let's turn to people who study them -- social scientists, historians, archaeologists, anthropologists. Jared Diamon and Joseph A. Tainter come to mind. There are many others.

Jared Diamond
* The Vanishing (article about his recent book)
* Twilight at Easter

Joseph A. Tainter
* Complexity, Problem Solving, and Sustainable Societies
* Resource Transitions and Energy Gain: Contexts of Organization / PDF (much better format) (written with T. F. H. Allen, Amanda Little, and Thomas W. Hoekstra)
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif

Unread postby Barbara » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:48:34

Quietkid,
same boat here. I follow this PO business with only one thing in my mind: my son. I can face anything, but first of all I want my son to be alive and healthy. I don't care about anything else, as long as he'll have shelter, food and safety.
Unfortunately my husband doesn't grasp this.

I also believe we in the Western countries will be heavily hitten. I've been in the Third World, and when you can rely only on a tiny potato garden behind your hut you don't give a blink about PO or not. One third of the world doesn't even have electricity, let alone cars or green revolutions.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Unread postby shakespear1 » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 05:55:11

I have been on all major continents of the world except Australia and see the world on a "train" speeding in the same direction as the one that took off in the US.

It will be very hard to stop it. What is needed is a shock :oops: Just like the Arab Oil Embargo.

That was probable the finest wake up call that we received in the US and did not understand its implication or perhaps simply chose to forget it.

We had a chance to be on that slow train but we wanted the bullet train and here we are. We need to swallow the medicine and that is it.

In Latin America they are living the reduced energy life ( look how many people walk and take the bus in many of these countries), Europe is not as bad as the US, Eastern Block countries are speeding to become US, India doing the same, China doing the same. Thus we have a huge number of people on this fast moving train.

Nope, it will be PAIN that will slow us down. Who knows, maybe we will like it.

In 1992 I was laid off by ARCO because oil prices were low etc. I decided to go to Russia to learn Russian. I was there nearly 2 years. And do you know what I learned? I learned to live without a car. Stand in line. Eat less exotic stuff. Make my own cottage cheese. Take the bus and metro.

And I LIKED IT. It was less stressful. Admittedly I had money, the Russians did not. But I learned that I COULD LIVE ON LESS.

I came back to US and lived on LESS. Everywhere I went since then I hae practiced the same mantra. LESS IS GOOD. I don't need to change my car every year. Wardrobe every few months. Huge house etc.

It can be done but something/someone needs to show THEM how :)

This will not be welcome by great corporations so don't expect this LESSON to come from this quarter!!!!
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby turmoil » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 08:01:48

think about it this way. If you really cared about the future of your family, you wouldn't live in the suburbs (how's that for a mind bender). You want to save your own skin like all of us. But if we really cared, we would see that our lifestyle is unsustainable and evolve.

The powers that be are there because we put them there.
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Unread postby thequietkid10 » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 13:01:54

In response to the ecology point, I would like to point out that human beings are unlike any other species on Earth, in that we can consciencly decide to have one or no children. A phenomonion that is increasingly more common in today's world. Not nearly enough to beat carrying capacity, but its better then Ben Franklin's 17 brothers and sisters.

And stupid_monkeys, with all due respect, I would like to point out that there are things we can do, to maintain a suburan lifestyle and still conserve energy. Such as car pooling, public transportation, walking, working from home, and traveling less.
User avatar
thequietkid10
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon 20 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby LadyRuby » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 13:12:27

Barbara said:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') follow this PO business with only one thing in my mind: my son. I can face anything, but first of all I want my son to be alive and healthy. I don't care about anything else, as long as he'll have shelter, food and safety.
Unfortunately my husband doesn't grasp this.


Man can I relate! We have two small children. They could care less about "things" and so forth, but they do need food, water, etc. They are who I worry about. And like you, my husband doesn't really get it. A few choice quotes from him (regarding my obsession with peak oil as of late), "I think you're hanging out with the wrong crowd, it sounds like a bunch of psycho survivalist Ted Kazinsky types," and "I think you're going off the deep end." And I consider myself pretty moderate here!
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Unread postby turmoil » Tue 21 Jun 2005, 16:28:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thequietkid10', '.')..there are things we can do, to maintain a suburban lifestyle and still conserve energy. Such as car pooling, public transportation, walking, working from home, and traveling less.


all the energy saved would be great, and i can only hope that if PO isn't the end of suburbia that people do begin to conserve more. There are plenty of solutions to energy waste, they are just not politically or socially acceptable (yet). It’s just not the American way to use less rather than more.

But inherent in the suburban lifestyle is separating yourself (by unnecessary distances) from the means of production, which requires a lot of energy. This is why we Americans have such a large ecological footprint compared to other countries (5 times, I might add). Sure a lot of people have jobs now because of all the inefficiency, but the rug will pulled out soon enough. Imagine all the jobs that could be created through efficiency rather than lost.

Just because lots of people live in suburbia now, doesn't mean it's the best way to live. It's inherently unsustainable. It's NOT your fault though. You were told that it is the American Dream to live out in the middle of nowhere, and drive everywhere. People have been told that for 50+ years. It’s a great way to run a country, until you run out of cheap resources. :roll:

I'm not blaming you. I'm just not sugar-coating anything for you or trying to tell you what you want to hear. This isn’t the FNC for sure...
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron