Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Gail: Energy Supply, Population, and the Economy

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 14:00:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '(')Funny the timing Ibon, as you just posted your pictures. The trees timbered are large ancient trees. Not the stuff of the modern timber industry. There is no value cutting a stick by hand anymore.)


Just to clarify to those like Pstarr who recognize an old growth tree. This was an oak, about 300 years old and dead when harvested. We got a permit to take it down because it was no longer a living tree. We harvested two trees like this.

We had no idea when we dropped the tree if the heartwood was sound or rotted. Both trees were clean and we got about 5000 board feet of wood from those two trees that were used to frame our cabin and lodge.

There is no reason that selectively harvesting trees of all sizes could not once again become a viable industry in a more regional economy with small mills like you still see in Panama. It is about the return of human muscle labor once FF goes into decline. We used to do it. We can do it again. I have been reminded repeatedly of that fact during the past several years building out this project. From harvesting timber to building trails the muscle power output of some of the labor has been nothing short of humbling to these old gringo bones of mine.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Ibon » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 14:25:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')hanks Ibon for the clarification. I was trying really really hard not to be too snarky. Did I succeed? LOL


You succeeded fine....... you are not snarky.....you are awake....big difference

Like the pic you posted. would like to hear more about that.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Pops » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 18:00:15

I wanted to pull out a picture of the thing Gail is talking about ( got the whole page but hey) which is "Energy Rate Density" from this paper /www.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchaisson/reprints/EnergyRateDensity_I_FINAL_2011.pdf
if big words and common sense disguised with buzzwords are your thing go for it. LOL

It's basically a fancy way of saying what we always talk about, which is diminishing returns, good money after bad, low hanging fruit, blah, blah. Or Ibon's logging vs helicopter logging for example; ITER vs tallow candles, etc.

The idea that technology can save us from technologies failures.

Image
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby jupiters_release » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 19:23:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jupiters_release', 'I') had no idea the third world had it so nice.


Depends where you are. The slums in the big cities of the third world are pretty hellish, but some rural areas I've visited in China, Tibet, Thailand, Peru, Ecuador, Mexico, Chile, Turkey, Palestine, Egypt, Indonesia, Tanzania, South Africa etc. were almost idyllically simple and nice.


911 falser turned tourist anthropologist. :lol:
Do not seek the truth, only cease to cherish opinions.
jupiters_release
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 20:48:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'I') wanted to pull out a picture

ENERGY_RATE_DENSITY.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Loki » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 23:32:08

Ibon, that is some crazy impressive chainsaw milling. I'm assuming that guy does this kind of work full time?

I'd rather talk more about chainsaw milling, but to steer this back on topic, that chainsaw uses gasoline, obviously. But even if gasoline becomes super expensive and hard to get, maybe it'll still make sense for folks like the guy in your pics to use his Stihl. Or maybe it won't. I really don't know.

Here in Oregon, some of the best timber country in the world, the timber industry tanked when the housing market went under. The two are intimately tied (for obvious reasons). If Gail's shark fin scenario occurs (which I doubt it will), we can certainly figure out new ways to do things, like your guy hand milling an old growth oak with a chainsaw. We can go back to oxen, skid roads, splash dams, and steam donkeys if things get bad enough. But there won't be much of a timber industry left. There will be a catastrophic drop in demand for their product.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Loki » Mon 14 Apr 2014, 23:46:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hvacman', 'A')ctually, in the not-so-hippie-dippy world of wood production, scrap wood historically was a transport fuel. Back in the day, logs were hauled from the woods to the mill by narrow-gauge rail using wood-burning locomotives, that is if they weren't floated down to the mill via flume or the river. Wood-fired "steam donkeys" snaked the logs out from the woods to the staging decks.

And the industry is increasingly electrifying:

http://www.letourneau-inc.com/forestry/

These log stackers are like diesel locomotives - series diesel-electric hybrids. They are very popular at western US saw mill log decks. They have regenerative braking and electric motors that do almost everything except steer. Current-generation batteries still don't have the power density, but in a few years, it may be viable to replace the diesel engine with batteries. Jib cranes are fixed and all-electric With a log yard designed around it, mobile log stackers aren't required.

I lived near a couple mills for a few years. Their log stackers are diesel as far as I know (I didn't see any mention of hybrid tech in your link). All the log trucks that brought logs to the mills are diesel. All the trucks the workers drove to the harvest sites are gas and diesel. All the chainsaws are gasoline. Yarders are all diesel as far as I know. All the equipment that builds and maintains logging roads is diesel or gasoline. The trains and trucks that ship the milled product are primarily diesel as far as I know. The only thing in the production process that is likely to be electric are the saws in the mill and maybe some of the forklifts. And a good chunk (45%) of Oregon's electricity comes from coal and NG.

I can see how electricity might be used more at mills, but the logging end of it is utterly reliant on gas and diesel, and can't easily switch to battery power unless there's a massive leap in technology.
A garden will make your rations go further.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon
Top

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby careinke » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 01:03:41

Ibon,

That is some very impressive chainsawing. I'm going to have to show this picture to a few loggers I know. Nice score on the Oak too. Can I ask why in the world you would need a permit to cut a dead tree on your property?
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Ibon » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 01:08:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', 'I')bon,

Can I ask why in the world you would need a permit to cut a dead tree on your property?


We are in the buffer zone of a national park (La Amistad NP) where even owners of private land cannot cut down a tree without a permit. To build the few cabins we also needed to secure an environmental impact statement for the same reason.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Quinny » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 01:40:54

I was totally impressed by the handmilling by chainsaw, something I have tried on a much smaller scale and have been totally incapable of doing!

My next purchase is one of these.

http://www.logosol.co.uk/store/sawmills/big-mill-system/big-mill-timberjig/big-mill-timmerjigg.html

Back on topic though:

One of the points that I believe that I believe people are missing is the scale of the 'substitution solution'. Point solutions will occur, and I believe that rationing will be the chosen option for many governments, but the timescale (and the 'energy sink effect') will IMHO make the idea that you'll all suddenly be driving round in NG vehicles whilst switching electricity generation to solar unrealistic.

Image
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 06:15:41

How many barrels of oil are in a cubic mile? Or more to the point how long will it take to use a cubic mile of oil at current production rates?
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Pops » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 07:29:00

LOL, the climate change and peak oil thread turns to chainsaws.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby dohboi » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 08:28:55

"LOL, the climate change and peak oil thread turns to chainsaws."

Which brings me to my favorite metaphor regarding our present predicament:

We are a five year old wielding a live chainsaw. Yet some seem to think that what we need most is more fuel for the saw.
User avatar
dohboi
Harmless Drudge
Harmless Drudge
 
Posts: 19990
Joined: Mon 05 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 11:30:25

I cubic mile of oil (assuming all oil and not the oil in a cubic mile of reservoir rock) = 150 billion cubic feet (5280’ X 5280’ X 5280’). And 1 bbl = 5.6 cubic feet

So 150 billion cubic feet/5.6 cubic feet per bbl = about 26 billion bbls of oil

Or about 300 days of current global production.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Subjectivist » Tue 15 Apr 2014, 11:59:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'I') cubic mile of oil (assuming all oil and not the oil in a cubic mile of reservoir rock) = 150 billion cubic feet (5280’ X 5280’ X 5280’). And 1 bbl = 5.6 cubic feet

So 150 billion cubic feet/5.6 cubic feet per bbl = about 26 billion bbls of oil

Or about 300 days of current global production.


Thank you for the math, and that highlights one of the problems with this sort of graphic. Only two of the items are clearly defined, the value of a cubic mile of crude ol is calculatable, and the energy output of the Three Gorges Dam for 50 years times 4. There is no single standard power output for a solar panel, a wind turbine, a coal power station, or a nuclear power station. Values for each alternative range all over the place so the comparison is impossible to validate.

The Three Gorges Dam has a capacity of 22.5 GWe, so four times that is 90 GWe times 50 years is 4500 times 365 times 24 because it produces that capacity every hour of those fifty years. One GW hour is 3.6*10^12 joules of energy. One bbl of crude oil is 6.1*10^9 joules of energy. I will let someone else do the rest of the math, I always miss a step when converting exponential functions somewhere and mess up my answer. But it should be something like 26 billion bbl times 6.1 billion joules divided into 4500 * 365*24*3.6 Trillion joules. Either my math is really horrible or the math used by the person creating the graphic was.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Quinny » Wed 16 Apr 2014, 03:06:24

When I first saw it 1 cubic mile was about a years consumption.

The maths seemed to be to be OK (to an order of magnitude) when I took a quick look, but I stand to be corrected!
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby Tanada » Wed 16 Apr 2014, 08:36:13

26 E10^9 * 6.1 E10^9 = 158.6 E10^18
4500 * 365 * 24 =39.42 E10^6 * 3.6 E10^12 = 141.912 E10^18
158.6 ~~141.912

Quinny is correct, the numbers are actually within the ballpark of one another.

However that does not change the other point about wind/solar/nuclear/coal not having a defined unit size to judge against. Suffice it to say, a cubic mile of oil has a whole lot of energy in it, and we burn over a cubic mile every year.

Coal consumption world wide in 2011 was 8 Billion short tons according to the EIA. There are roughly 39 cubic feet of coal in a short ton and as ROCKMAN pointed out 5280^3 feet in a cubic mile. That gives a mass of 3,774,306,461 short tons per cubic mile of coal. 8 Billion divided by 3.774 Billion gives 2.119 Cubic Miles of Coal consumed in 2011.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Gail: The Shark That Ate CC

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Wed 16 Apr 2014, 09:36:35

And now to keep this "meaningful" comparison going lets compute the energy in a cubic mile of apples and compare to a 1,000 cubits of oranges. I anxiously await your numbers. LOL.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron