by Narz » Wed 05 Mar 2014, 00:06:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'L')OL, that is a pretty funny statement, cities are more "ecologically viable"?
Where do you think all the stuff needed to maintain cities comes from? I guess if you strip-mine everywhere else and ship the goods to town then yeah. LOL
Well they are more sustainable than suburbs & most rural areas. Unless we all want to be farmers which is not going to happen.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')ut you present a false dilemma, the point is self-sufficiency, not location. As Newf points out, if the rural person is simply a suburbanite with a longer commute and a horse instead of a plastic flamingo as a lawn ornament then yes, they are just as dependent as a city mouse in the apartment. The person in an apartment has no choice but to be completely dependent on long supply chains for his every need: food, water, heat, clothing - everything. It just isn't possible to be otherwise. He is not only dependent on the fossil fueled supply chain for his inputs, he is dependent upon the fossil fueled economy for his "output". His output - a paycheck - in most cases is 100% a manifestation of the that same FF economy. He is doubly dependent.
But while there is little possibility of being independent in an apartment, the farther one gets from the city center and the closer to the primary resource - sun/soil/water - the greater the opportunity to be independent.
I cut up some firewood from my property last week because propane prices are high, I ate canned food I grew and meat I raised and drank some water I harvested and thereby eliminated my need for that much income- I was self-sufficient in those areas. The guy in the apartment (if lucky) gor a paycheck and paid his water & gas bill and ate food flown in from out here by me or maybe from Peru. Who is more self-sufficient?
The whole self-sufficient dick measuring contest is pointless. You use tools, cans, electricity, the Internet, entertainment all from other places. In hard times the supplies to rural areas will get cut off first. Think having a farm will make you powerful? Likely it will just make you exploited in the endtimes type scenerio many doomers worry about. Farmers are always oppressed, rarely powerful, just look at The Seven Samurai (fiction of course but illustrates the point, and a great movie of course
).
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he question isn't whether NYC will fail, it's whether a particular New Yorker's paycheck will fail, especially if that new Yorker is me. Considering that today's cities and suburbs are completely at the mercy of fossil fuels to be "ecologically viable" in both their inputs and outputs, my choice is to be less dependent on FFs and more on elbow grease.