by Keith_McClary » Tue 14 Jan 2014, 02:12:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'M')y point would be, that is how things work. Capitalism recognizes the actual nature of humans and layers a system on top of that nature. It is the only economic system that is successful in large countries over significant periods, because it never asks anyone to go against their true nature.
I have all due respect for the Buddha, Christ, and other prophets/philosophers. But I have to note that none was especially successful at changing basic human nature. Capitalism does not attempt to change the nature of mankind, it simply recognizes what it is and works with it.
I believe that all attempts to change the nature of man are doomed to failure. The end result of the fossil fuel boom may be a species with a new set of sensibilities and beliefs, after the boom ends and more people die than have existed in the world before. The coming mass extinction of humanity is an example of the scale of event that will kick evolution into high gear. The Four Horsemen will reap humanity, the few survivors will either evolve into wiser creatures or devolve into brutes.
Either way, change is coming. But it will never be true that absent an acute survival crisis, people will implement the impractical and unworkable schemes of an obscure philosopher (pick any of them) in defiance of their animal nature.
Nature is cruel, as they say.
You keep saying "successful" - you seem to mean maximum consumption of resources, which, given your notion of the "nature of man", you say will result in the "mass extinction of humanity".
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, how do you define "successful"?