by Ibon » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 15:51:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '.') This KJ is a complete jerk. I have politely and repeatedly asked him for details, methods of space exploration. Challenged him on the history of US space exploration. Blows me off and continues his Gene Rodenberry crap. I agree with SeaGyspy.
For others reading it can be instructive watching someone like KJ run like a hamster on a wheel spinning nowhere.
It is for those others that I engage KJ and others like him.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
-

Ibon
- Expert

-
- Posts: 9572
- Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
- Location: Volcan, Panama
-
by SeaGypsy » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 16:57:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'I')bon, I have not "blown you off". In case it is not obvious:
1) The current technology for putting people and equipment into orbit from Earth's surface is chemical fueled rockets. This is completely adequate for the task at hand, since the materials for space colonies are sourced from asteroids. There are hundreds of known near-Earth objects and millions more asteroids between Mars and Jupiter. Note that if you want to make any form of economic argument about payload costs into orbit or planetary spaces, you have to ignore stats about both the Apollo program and the Shuttle, and use figures from modern systems such as SSTO and Virgin Galactic.
So you presume that Virgin Galactic

The world does actually run on music- even cave men knew that. Perhaps KJ is Branson? He thinks he "developed the technology which runs the world", of which he admits being "damned proud"; thinks we should all be fantasizing about space travel and buying Galactic tickets (the age is right).
by KaiserJeep » Mon 14 Oct 2013, 17:23:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')

is going to lift

this into space? Not without unobtanium it won't LOL
You show a picture of a ridiculously huge mining machine designed for open-pit mining in a 1 gravity field, and ask if the VG prototype will lift it? How stupid is that? Hint: mining in space does not involve digging. Which you would know if you had bothered to educate yourself. I told you again - for the third time, where the information you need is located. It is not my function to regurgitate into your open head as if you were a newly hatched bird, however devoutly you may believe it is.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'T')his is lie. I have repeatedly requested you describe the technology. You avoid. You chicken.
I described it above. I was correct and complete, and you don't even understand why that is true.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '
')Intelligent? You've made clear you don't believe in such outlandish ideas as AGW, Medicare, and gaia. Yet you appear to be a free-market missionary with religious zeal.
I also posted a link describing nasa-scientist Lovelock's research on self-regulating, complex systems, but you obviously don't have the time or the imagination to wander outside your 62-year-old-sclerotic presumptions. How will you ever get to space? LOL
Lovelock is the laughingstock of NASA and he should be. Living Planets? Earth Mothers? That is a religious discussion, he is welcome to his Faith however silly I think it is.
The Earth is a complex natural system (NOT a single huge living organism) and I am an engineer who specializes in computer design. I understand what many scientists do not, which is that NONE of the climate models work. Not a single one of them. When you test them by feeding them historical data, they do not successfully predict either temperatures or temperature trends. If you understand that when they take a complex mathematical model, plug in one term representing actual data and all others are raw assumptions, the result is useless. The IPCC makes no secret that this is what they are doing. The peer review process has torn apart every climate model ever built. If we ever found one that even half worked, the entire world would know. Meanwhile, nobody should be making policy decisions using broken models.
The facts are that we lack the computer hardware to adequately model the Earth's climate. We may never build a machine capable of that task, and if we did, we would not have the accurate data to feed it.
Again, I'm not going into space. I'm going to Illinois to retire on an off-the-grid farm with a couple of electric vehicles. If the space colonies happen in 10 years or 100 years or 1000 years, whether their advent is before/during/after hydrocarbon depletion ultimately does not matter. But we DO have all the knowledge needed to build them today, we lack only the will.