by dsula » Wed 21 Aug 2013, 11:50:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')I'm sorry, I don't understand your question? First you ask me what issues, and when I mention all those not already covered, and provide a specific example, you seem to become confused and ask more questions which were all answered the first time. Is your question meant to be sarcastic?
You're loosing me here, I'm afraid.
But let me try again. And this is not a sarcastic question and I hope I get a real answer.
And yes, you're correct, I'm confused about your answers. On several occasion on this forum you argue that higher prices make more oil available in such quantities (given the price is right) that BAU can continue for a long long time. I assume you hold this point of view for everything non-renewable, and maybe also semi-renewable (fish, tree, etc.).
Yet on occasion you also mention that resource scarcity is in fact a problem that must be taken seriously and cannot be ignored.
This is my confusion. What is it now? A problem? Or not? And what kind of problem is it? And how should it be dealt with?
Sometimes I wonder what all those past civilizations did wrong? Shouldn't economics saved the Easter Islanders? Why did high wood prices not create more trees?
Shouldn't technology marched right along and saved the Romans? Why didn't necessity and scarcity make them invent nuclear power?