by Outcast_Searcher » Sat 27 Oct 2012, 12:04:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', ' ')Everyone is wondering when China's RE bubble will burst. How can a place with $10 a day wages can afford $200k units (millions and millions of them)?
This is a great question, SeaGypsy. I've given it some thought, as I'm pretty heavy into investing, and how Chindia does long term clearly affects things a LOT.
The short answer is -- MASSIVE SCALE. The vast majority of Chinese are still peasants.
A more detailed answer:
I THINK it is the vast scale of things is so awesome with China's population that 99.9% of us can't really wrap our minds around the implications without intense effort. (This includes me).
The middle class (a BIG one) is rising fairly rapidly in China. I presume it is THESE folks who make more like $100 a day, who are funding the RE market. The WELL OVER A BILLION still impoverished peasant class is still living in a slum, a shack, out in the street, or in some rural community doing farming (and very poor as they have no decent transpo infrastructure to get their goods to nonlocal markets).
From what I've seen on documentaries and read, there isn't much of a Chinese safety net for the poor. We in the US complain about income inequality -- but considering transfer payments from the government aren't counted as income in the official statistics -- our incomes are relatively equal (aside from the super-rich, say, .1%).
So, as long as their economy can crank along at (say) 6% or more growth, and that makes more middle class folks who demand your $200K units and can make the payments -- the game goes on.
Ironically, the larger the Chinese middle class grows (hundreds of millions in a decade?) the more the Chinese authorities NEED to keep things humming. Can you imagine a country-wide riot with HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of angry demonstrors?! I can't, and I don't think any Chinese leader wants to.
So, as long as they have money to spend -- in my considered opinion, the beat is likely to go on. This could last what, decades?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.