by Pops » Wed 07 Nov 2012, 09:28:53
So the question is, are the R's more inclined to compromise?
I didn't watch much TV coverage (reading Snow Mountain Passage, a novel about the Donner party) I know Akin lost, Bauchman won and Carl Rove showed just how fair and balanced fox is, LOL. I guess if the election was, as some said, a referendum on big government, then at least the results seem to be in favor of some government.
Really the whole thing still boils down to what the Rs want. Another four years of filibusters may be Grovers idea of success but if so I'm gonna say they'll be worse off in '16 - even if they nominate a latino, which after Steel, won't surprise me a bit, I'll even predict it here and now.
So in that case I'm thinking that immigration reform will happen too but not in the way the extremists pray for, it will probably include the dream act.
Perhaps some version of the Grand Bargain.
And considering how completely Wall Street abandoned the Ds I'll guess we will see an increase in regulation there.
Don't want to get too carried away...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)