by Pops » Thu 09 Aug 2012, 14:03:16
Or, just an option here, Romney could be in the pocket of the Koch Bros and O could actually be concerned about the environmental risks - in the pockets of treehuggers if you prefer.
It's pretty ironic actually that you would raise the pipeline. In this case the bumper sticker excuse is a few hundred permanent jobs (obviously the actual motive is hundreds of millions, probably billions in profits) and the hold up is potential risk to the environment – the classic externality.
It doesn't surprise me that you would use the pipe as an example Plant, after all privatizing profits and socializing risk IS the party line and you're a dependable party guy. What is so surprising to me is that mitt would allow the taboo word "externality' in a champaign book.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505123_162- ... -at-stake/
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)