by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 17 Jun 2012, 05:05:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', ' ')This is the crisis of globalisation that Marx contemplated
No its not.
Marx didn't have a clue about peak oil and its silly to pretend he did.

Right. We constantly talk about peak oil and the consequences for the global economy (while the population expands apace, making things much worse) and how that's unsustainable.
To me, some things seem rather obvious, from a global perspepective:
1). It's easy to have the ILLUSION of BAU growth persist UNTIL there are no longer plenty of CHEAP resources to utilize per capita (supporting massive growth).
2). We have now REACHED the end of such cheap resources -- peak oil (or the end of cheap oil, take your pick) being the catalyst (or the obvious signal flag).
3). A gigantic percentage of people are oblivious to this, or in complete denial. In the U.S., the far right denies the possibility of finite resources, claims "Star Trek" technology will "take care of everything", or even cites "God" or some version of man's manifest destiny to justify maximizing resource utilization (i.e. profit for the wealthy). Meanwhile the far (overall) left denies the possibility that collectively we can bear any form of (common sense) "austerity" as a whole -- i.e. using less resources on average (and controlling global population growth) before we destroy ourselves. Somehow "fairness" always seems to trump ending ANY government programs, no matter how useless or destructive (this goes for both sides of the political spectrum, despite all the rhetoric).
From what I see on the news about European and third world politics via growth and economic issues overall -- the details may be different, but the basic pattern seems to hold globally.
We don't have infinite resources to consume -- whether we redistribute them massively in an attempt to make things "fair", or not. Thus, SOME form of austerity on a global scale WILL take place if technological advances can't overcome the issues fast enough. (If mother nature enforces the "austerity" it's called "die off", and is far less pleasant than, say, less consumption).
There seems to be growing evidence that technology can't outpace our problems. But by all means, let's stick our heads firmly in the sand, argue some political perspective until the bitter, even vindictive end, and know in our hearts that we're "right". That is working SO WELL that we should certainly continue down that road.
Give the human race a giant "Darwin Award" Kewpie doll. After all, we seem to "win" it every day, via our collective stupidity. It seems tragic to me, but I grew up before these issues were so readily apparent.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.