by Sixstrings » Sun 20 May 2012, 09:40:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/596549/thumbs/s-MT-RUSHMORE-UN-large.jpg[/img]
Mt. Rushmore Site Should Be Returned To Indigenous Native American Tribes, U.N. Official Says
South Dakota's Black Hills, home to the granite faces carved into
Mt. Rushmore, should be restored as Native American tribal lands, a United Nations official recently said.
James Anaya, a
U.N. special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous people, completed a fact-finding mission on Friday that included meetings with a number of Native American tribal leaders as well as White House officials. His investigation led him to suggest that the United States take additional steps to repair the nation's legacy of oppression against Native Americans. He'll officially propose the plan in an upcoming report. From the Associated Press:
Anaya said land restoration would help bring about reconciliation. He named the Black Hills as an example.
He said restoring to indigenous people what they have a legitimate claim to can be done in a way that is not divisive "so that the Black Hills, for example, isn't just a reminder of the subordination and domination of indigenous peoples in that country."The Black Hills, home to Mount Rushmore, are public land but are considered sacred by the Sioux tribes.
The Sioux have refused to accept money awarded in a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision and have sought return of the land. The Black Hills and other lands were set aside for the Sioux in an 1868 treaty. But Congress passed a law in 1877 taking the land.According to Anaya, handing over these lands would be a key step toward repairing relations with the indigenous people who once controlled them. It would also further the nation's compliance with the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, a measure that President Barack Obama endorsed in 2010, reversing a previous vote.
"
I have heard stories that make evident the profound hurt that indigenous peoples continue to feel because of the history of oppression they have faced," Anaya said Friday in a statement issued by the U.N. human rights office in Geneva.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/07/mt-rushmore-un-report-james-anaya_n_1496120.htmlI don't know if this is the same report as that other UN report or what.
But give me a break.. some guy in Geneva SWITZERLAND going on about the plight of American natives. Why doesn't this UN rappateur have something to say about European discrimination and harassment of Gypsies and Roma people hm?
There are far bigger human rights problems right there at home in Europe without them digging back into 1877 America.
I will admit it, we've got some human rights problems in the US but not with Indians that's very much in the past. But the UN going on about it, it's not going to help, it just seems like anti-Americanism and a farce when you have countries like Iran and Libya which had their turn to head human rights committees.
And right now in 2012, you have European ethnic / racial discrimination of Roma people and harassment of muslim women not letting them wear their veils if they want. (Americans aren't the most pro-muslim people but we have FREEDOM here unlike in Europe, in America a woman can wear a veil if she wants we have a Bill of Rights, local government just says you can't go around naked otherwise you're free to wear what you want -- whereas Europe suppresses individual liberty in the name of "preserving their culture" and that's all ok yet we're supposed to hand over Mt. Rushmore).
Europe needs a "sepecial rapporteur" to address their own human rights problems.P.S. Mt. Rushmore was built as a tourist attraction to give people a reason to drive out and see South Dakota. It worked. It provides a lot of tourist dollars for native people. If the Sioux say it's sacred then that's tough that was 135 years ago. I'm sure the land was sacred to some other native people before the Sioux took it from them.
This all just seems a farce to me, you've got Europe falling apart and Greece electing the Nazi Party and Sarkozy was ethnic-bashing his whole term, religious rights under assault in Europe, yet somehow Sioux Indian grievances 135 years old is an issue. Do the Sioux even care that much? I'd be surprised. Native Americans are US citizens. They're integrated, they get preferential hiring, go to the national parks you will see native American park rangers, and our Parks preserve their cultural heritage, what more can we do?
Native Americans ARE American. This isn't France we have no fixed culture or academie francaise policing the langauge, the Indians' culture is ours and ours is theirs.