Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE United Nations (UN) Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby vision-master » Sun 06 May 2012, 18:03:38

The Europeans caused this 'welfare' problem.
vision-master
 

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Cog » Sun 06 May 2012, 18:32:59

Its called the White Man's Burden for good reason.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Sixstrings » Sun 06 May 2012, 23:22:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', 'T')ypical anti-American, anti-Israel UN scum. They turn the other way when Syria is butchering their own people in 2012, but call America on the carpet for crimes committed 150 years ago.


Good point there. The UN ought to be focusing on Syria, not South Dakota.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Sixstrings » Sun 06 May 2012, 23:43:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'M')ost people who live and work in these remote areas (including the vast majority of senior elders, believe there is way too much welfare (whether in the form of social security payments or royalties); and that these act as a severe disincentive to productive activity by younger folk.


Oddly enough, the only way to protect aboriginal culture would be to do nothing at all. With welfare, all you wind up with are culturally Western people drinking all day in the desert, and what was unique about aboriginal life is gone.

Saw a documentary recently, actually on "the number 1," but it featured aborignals. They see the world in a different way. They have an oral tradition, they don't have maps they use songs instead. They have no words for or concept of "numbers." They asked one old man how many grandchildren he has, and he said "many" and then named them -- like 7, but he didn't have a word for the number 7.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 07 May 2012, 00:00:24

Tell that one to the UN.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Keith_McClary » Mon 07 May 2012, 00:59:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', 'I')f they want some land, they can pay for it like the rest of us.
How much land did "the rest of you" originally pay for. About as much as the Settlers in Palestine or the Nazi Germans in their Lebensraum. Zero.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 07 May 2012, 03:49:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', 'I')f they want some land, they can pay for it like the rest of us.
How much land did "the rest of you" originally pay for. About as much as the Settlers in Palestine or the Nazi Germans in their Lebensraum. Zero.

Ferretlover is American and you are Australian...
So pot was calling kettle black?
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 07 May 2012, 04:40:48

A tiny lot in Melbourne's cheapest suburb, with nothing on it would set me back $200k. If I were 1/16th aboriginal (I probably am, just can't prove it), I would get priority government housing capped at 25% of my income. So maybe my grandad did well, and his grandad better, but it's a rip off. My family worked themselves to the bone for 9 generations, not to sit under a tree drinking spouting 'this is my land' but to have a life with options for our children. Land ownership is a huge rort.

PS, my original Aussie ancestor was an Irish potatoe famine survivor who had lost to starvation 205 of 216 people in his village.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 07 May 2012, 05:12:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')PS, my original Aussie ancestor was an Irish potatoe famine survivor who had lost to starvation 205 of 216 people in his village.

Most of white Aussies, have far better, full blooded ancestors...
All the best what humanity could crop out, both on male and female line... :-D
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby SeaGypsy » Mon 07 May 2012, 17:39:51

Shows how much you know about down under. Until about 1880's the vast majority of immigration was not just white, but male. Men outnumbered women by 8/1 in 1850 and 6/1 in 1885. Equity didn't come until well into the 20th century. On top of that, 95% of migration before 1880 was convict labor, with the 5% being mostly military, only about 2% were free settlers in the early part, with this going up during gold rushes/ again all male. The aboriginals did not have this shortage of women. My family has been here since 1828. Statistically alone this means there is an over 98% chance of Indigenous blood. My free settler Irish ancestor on mother's side was 'granted' 10 square miles 25 miles from Melbourne in 1832.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Keith_McClary » Tue 08 May 2012, 01:58:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', 'I') don't see any evidence of Native Americans "fighting back" to gain all this land. They seem to be mostly happy with their situation or chronically alcoholic. A bit hard to organize when you're falling down drunk all the time.
The colonists exterminated the ones who fought back.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Keith_McClary » Tue 08 May 2012, 02:07:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')hey want to return lost lands to lost peoples; here is one for you, North Africa and the Middle East were Christian 600 years before they were Muslim.
And before they converted to Christianity they were Jews and other Taliban-style bronze age cults religions.

But they are the same people, religious conversion is not the same as ethnic cleansing.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Serial_Worrier » Tue 08 May 2012, 03:58:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', 'I') don't see any evidence of Native Americans "fighting back" to gain all this land. They seem to be mostly happy with their situation or chronically alcoholic. A bit hard to organize when you're falling down drunk all the time.
The colonists exterminated the ones who fought back.


To the victors go the spoils, boohoo.
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby Tanada » Tue 08 May 2012, 06:17:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'T')hey want to return lost lands to lost peoples; here is one for you, North Africa and the Middle East were Christian 600 years before they were Muslim.
And before they converted to Christianity they were Jews and other Taliban-style bronze age cults religions.

But they are the same people, religious conversion is not the same as ethnic cleansing.


Tell that to the Coptic Christians in Egypt who have been targeted for murder, rape and pillage since the Arab Spring. Their traditions go back nearly 2000 years but dozens of their churches have been burned in mass arson fires and hundreds have been murdered. Not a murmur comes from the UN.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby mtn_chief » Wed 09 May 2012, 03:01:55

I see many still cling to stereotypes ... The US should honor its treaties. Congress over turned many Treaties that were negotiated on good faith yet once The we took it fair n squares got theirs the tribes got nothing ... These billions the tribes supposedly got has been stolen misused by the Tribes US appointed agents and agencies ..... go ahead cling to them stereotypes ... beat your chest you took it
mtn_chief
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2011, 20:17:13
Location: South of the Medicine line

Re: US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says UN

Postby SeaGypsy » Wed 09 May 2012, 15:34:03

I call the Indigenous areas of Australia (where I have lived and worked for many years) the Lawyer's picnic. Lawyers and agencies accumulate the bulk of indigenous funding. But there is the rub- accumulation. This trait seems very strong in some cultures, weak in others. The more nomadic and more recent the de- originalization the more likely this is not an accumulative culture.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

UN Special Rapporteur: return Mt. Rushmore to the natives

Postby Sixstrings » Sun 20 May 2012, 09:40:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/596549/thumbs/s-MT-RUSHMORE-UN-large.jpg[/img]

Mt. Rushmore Site Should Be Returned To Indigenous Native American Tribes, U.N. Official Says

South Dakota's Black Hills, home to the granite faces carved into Mt. Rushmore, should be restored as Native American tribal lands, a United Nations official recently said.

James Anaya, a U.N. special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous people, completed a fact-finding mission on Friday that included meetings with a number of Native American tribal leaders as well as White House officials. His investigation led him to suggest that the United States take additional steps to repair the nation's legacy of oppression against Native Americans. He'll officially propose the plan in an upcoming report. From the Associated Press:

Anaya said land restoration would help bring about reconciliation. He named the Black Hills as an example. He said restoring to indigenous people what they have a legitimate claim to can be done in a way that is not divisive "so that the Black Hills, for example, isn't just a reminder of the subordination and domination of indigenous peoples in that country."

The Black Hills, home to Mount Rushmore, are public land but are considered sacred by the Sioux tribes. The Sioux have refused to accept money awarded in a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision and have sought return of the land. The Black Hills and other lands were set aside for the Sioux in an 1868 treaty. But Congress passed a law in 1877 taking the land.

According to Anaya, handing over these lands would be a key step toward repairing relations with the indigenous people who once controlled them. It would also further the nation's compliance with the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, a measure that President Barack Obama endorsed in 2010, reversing a previous vote.

"I have heard stories that make evident the profound hurt that indigenous peoples continue to feel because of the history of oppression they have faced," Anaya said Friday in a statement issued by the U.N. human rights office in Geneva.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/07/mt-rushmore-un-report-james-anaya_n_1496120.html


I don't know if this is the same report as that other UN report or what.

But give me a break.. some guy in Geneva SWITZERLAND going on about the plight of American natives. Why doesn't this UN rappateur have something to say about European discrimination and harassment of Gypsies and Roma people hm?

There are far bigger human rights problems right there at home in Europe without them digging back into 1877 America.

I will admit it, we've got some human rights problems in the US but not with Indians that's very much in the past. But the UN going on about it, it's not going to help, it just seems like anti-Americanism and a farce when you have countries like Iran and Libya which had their turn to head human rights committees.

And right now in 2012, you have European ethnic / racial discrimination of Roma people and harassment of muslim women not letting them wear their veils if they want. (Americans aren't the most pro-muslim people but we have FREEDOM here unlike in Europe, in America a woman can wear a veil if she wants we have a Bill of Rights, local government just says you can't go around naked otherwise you're free to wear what you want -- whereas Europe suppresses individual liberty in the name of "preserving their culture" and that's all ok yet we're supposed to hand over Mt. Rushmore).

Europe needs a "sepecial rapporteur" to address their own human rights problems.

P.S. Mt. Rushmore was built as a tourist attraction to give people a reason to drive out and see South Dakota. It worked. It provides a lot of tourist dollars for native people. If the Sioux say it's sacred then that's tough that was 135 years ago. I'm sure the land was sacred to some other native people before the Sioux took it from them.

This all just seems a farce to me, you've got Europe falling apart and Greece electing the Nazi Party and Sarkozy was ethnic-bashing his whole term, religious rights under assault in Europe, yet somehow Sioux Indian grievances 135 years old is an issue. Do the Sioux even care that much? I'd be surprised. Native Americans are US citizens. They're integrated, they get preferential hiring, go to the national parks you will see native American park rangers, and our Parks preserve their cultural heritage, what more can we do?

Native Americans ARE American. This isn't France we have no fixed culture or academie francaise policing the langauge, the Indians' culture is ours and ours is theirs.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: THE United Nations (UN) Thread (merged)

Postby radon » Sun 20 May 2012, 15:25:21

At least you can have a taste of some alien coming over and taking the position of the supreme judge and starting to lecture and condemn you on various "human rights violations" - numerous US-sponsored outlets are constantly doing this sort of stuff all over the world.

Having said that, this UN initiative should hardly be taken seriously. Most likely, it has some powerful state-sponsors occupying important UN seats, these sponsors are unlikely to be based in Western Europe, and the initiative is directed at countering similar US-instigated endeavors in Eurasia and elsewhere. Simply playing politics. Forget it.
radon
 

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron